A Study to Compare the Efficacy of Rapydan Versus Tetracaine Gel
A Randomised, Controlled, Single-blinded, Cross Over Comparison Study to Compare the Efficacy of the Rapydan Medicated Plaster Versus Tetracaine Gel
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tydfill
-
Merthyr, Tydfill, United Kingdom, CF48 4DR
- Merthyr Tydfill Industrial Estate
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy male subjects of any race, 18 yrs or older
- No clinically significant findings on physical exam
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Damaged, denuded or broken skin at the designated site for application of the medicated plaster or gel.
- Know allergies to lidocaine, tetracaine or other local anaesthetics
- Concomitant use of prescription strength analgesics
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: A
Rapydan medicated plaster administered 30 minutes prior to cannulation on Visit 1 and tetracaine gel administered 45 minutes prior to cannulation on Visit 2.
|
Topical anaesthetic plaster
|
|
Active Comparator: B
Tetracaine gel administered 45 prior to cannulation on Visit 1 and then Rapydan administered 30 minutes prior to cannulation on Visit 1
|
Topical tetracaine gel
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
To demonstrate superiority for Rapydan medicated plaster applied 30 minutes over tetracaine gel applied for 45 minutes in terms of reducing pain associated with venous cannulation as assessed by the subject on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: VAS post venous cannulation
|
VAS post venous cannulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
To demonstrate comparable tolerability between Rapydan medicated plaster and tetracaine gel
Time Frame: Up to 14 days post exposure
|
Up to 14 days post exposure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rahul Dimber, MD, EUSA Pharma, Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- RD 305/24674
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.