Comparison of AV Optimization Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) (SMART-AV)
SMARTDELAY Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298-0053
- Medical College of Virginia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who meet current indications for a BSC CRT-D device with the SmartDelay algorithm
- Patients who are willing and capable of undergoing a device implant and participating in all testing associated with the SMART-AV Study
- Patients who are on optimal and stable pharmacologic therapy
- Patients who are expected to be in sinus rhythm at the time of implant
- Patients who have a life expectancy of more than 360 days, per physician's discretion
- Patients who are geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule
- Patients who are 18 years of age or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are in complete heart block, or who otherwise are unable to tolerate pacing at VVI-40 RV for up to 14 days
- Patients undergoing an upgrade of a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator who are unable to tolerate pacing at VVI-40 RV for up to 14 days
- Patients who have previously received cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Patients who are expected to receive a heart transplant or have other cardiac surgeries or procedures planned during the course of the study
- Patients who currently have or who are likely to receive a tricuspid valve prosthesis
- Patients who have a neuromuscular, orthopedic, or other non-cardiac condition that prevents normal, unsupported walking
- Patients who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study
- Patients who are currently enrolled in another investigational study or registry that would directly impact the treatment or outcome of the current study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Echo optimized AV delay
|
All subjects in this trial receive the same device.
For the purpose of this trial.
"intervention" is programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay in the two treatment arms, while the control arm will receive AV delay programming from a Fixed nominal setting.
Echo optimized and Algorithm optimized are the treatment arms programmed to receive optimized AV delay settings and will be compared to the Fixed nominal arm.
|
|
Active Comparator: Algorithm optimized AV delay
|
All subjects in this trial receive the same device.
For the purpose of this trial.
"intervention" is programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay in the two treatment arms, while the control arm will receive AV delay programming from a Fixed nominal setting.
Echo optimized and Algorithm optimized are the treatment arms programmed to receive optimized AV delay settings and will be compared to the Fixed nominal arm.
|
|
Active Comparator: Fixed AV Delay
|
All subjects in this trial receive the same device.
For the purpose of this trial.
"intervention" is programming of the atrio-ventricular (AV) delay in the two treatment arms, while the control arm will receive AV delay programming from a Fixed nominal setting.
Echo optimized and Algorithm optimized are the treatment arms programmed to receive optimized AV delay settings and will be compared to the Fixed nominal arm.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Change in square root of absolute left ventricular end systolic volume from baseline to 6 month follow up
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Secondary Endpoints Will Include Structural and Functional Measures
Time Frame: Chronic
|
Chronic
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: CRM Clinical Affairs, Boston Scientific Corporation
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, Sack S, Vogt J, Bakker P, Klein H, Kramer A, Ding J, Salo R, Tockman B, Pochet T, Spinelli J. Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. The Pacing Therapies for Congestive Heart Failure Study Group. The Guidant Congestive Heart Failure Research Group. Circulation. 1999 Jun 15;99(23):2993-3001. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.23.2993.
- Auricchio A, Ding J, Spinelli JC, Kramer AP, Salo RW, Hoersch W, KenKnight BH, Klein HU. Cardiac resynchronization therapy restores optimal atrioventricular mechanical timing in heart failure patients with ventricular conduction delay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Apr 3;39(7):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01727-8.
- Morales MA, Startari U, Panchetti L, Rossi A, Piacenti M. Atrioventricular delay optimization by doppler-derived left ventricular dP/dt improves 6-month outcome of resynchronized patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Jun;29(6):564-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00402.x.
- Hardt SE, Yazdi SH, Bauer A, Filusch A, Korosoglou G, Hansen A, Bekeredjian R, Ehlermann P, Remppis A, Katus HA, Kuecherer HF. Immediate and chronic effects of AV-delay optimization in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 14;115(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.03.015. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
- Inoue N, Ishikawa T, Sumita S, Nakagawa T, Kobayashi T, Matsushita K, Matsumoto K, Ohkusu Y, Taima M, Kosuge M, Uchino K, Kimura K, Umemura S. Long-term follow-up of atrioventricular delay optimization in patients with biventricular pacing. Circ J. 2005 Feb;69(2):201-4. doi: 10.1253/circj.69.201.
- Meisner JS, McQueen DM, Ishida Y, Vetter HO, Bortolotti U, Strom JA, Frater RW, Peskin CS, Yellin EL. Effects of timing of atrial systole on LV filling and mitral valve closure: computer and dog studies. Am J Physiol. 1985 Sep;249(3 Pt 2):H604-19. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1985.249.3.H604.
- Steendijk P, Tulner SA, Bax JJ, Oemrawsingh PV, Bleeker GB, van Erven L, Putter H, Verwey HF, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ. Hemodynamic effects of long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis by pressure-volume loops. Circulation. 2006 Mar 14;113(10):1295-304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540435. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
- Tournoux FB, Alabiad C, Fan D, Chen AA, Chaput M, Heist EK, Mela T, Mansour M, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Picard MH, Singh JP. Echocardiographic measures of acute haemodynamic response after cardiac resynchronization therapy predict long-term clinical outcome. Eur Heart J. 2007 May;28(9):1143-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm050. Epub 2007 Apr 21.
- Vidal B, Sitges M, Marigliano A, Delgado V, Diaz-Infante E, Azqueta M, Tamborero D, Tolosana JM, Berruezo A, Perez-Villa F, Pare C, Mont L, Brugada J. Optimizing the programation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Sep 15;100(6):1002-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.04.046. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
- Kedia N, Ng K, Apperson-Hansen C, Wang C, Tchou P, Wilkoff BL, Grimm RA. Usefulness of atrioventricular delay optimization using Doppler assessment of mitral inflow in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 15;98(6):780-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.017. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
- Howell S, Stivland TM, Stein K, Ellenbogen K, Tereshchenko LG. Response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in men and women: a secondary analysis of the SMART-AV randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 27;11(10):e049017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049017.
- Howell SJ, Stivland T, Stein K, Ellenbogen KA, Tereshchenko LG. Using Machine-Learning for Prediction of the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The SMART-AV Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;7(12):1505-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
- Spinale FG, Meyer TE, Stolen CM, Van Eyk JE, Gold MR, Mittal S, DeSantis SM, Wold N, Beshai JF, Stein KM, Ellenbogen KA; SMART-AV Trial Investigators. Development of a biomarker panel to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: Results from the SMART-AV trial. Heart Rhythm. 2019 May;16(5):743-753. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR-CA-050508-H
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.