Aliskiren and Renin Inhibition in Diastolic Heart Failure (ARID-HF)

May 11, 2015 updated by: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Aliskiren and Renin Inhibition in Diastolic Heart Failure in Mexican Americans

This study is being conducted to compare the effects that 2 different combinations of heart failure medications have on the levels of certain blood markers which cause and/or worsen heart failure. Additionally, the investigators will investigate any differences that may exist between Hispanics and Non-Hispanics. The investigators hope to find that Hispanic Americans will have a greater response to this new regimen compared to non-Hispanic Americans.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Our main hypothesis is that in contrast to non Hispanic whites, the degree of RAAS system activation is more pronounced in Mexican Americans with diastolic HF and consequently their response to RAAS inhibition therapy is greater. Blocking the RAAS with renin inhibitor plus aldosterone receptor blocker should produce measurable changes in biomarkers as well as physiologic improvement that could therefore translate into improved clinical outcomes. These changes should be greater appreciated in Mexican Americans if the central pathophysiologic influence of HF in this population was RAAS maladaptation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Lubbock, Texas, United States, 79430
        • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic stable diastolic HF documented by clinical diagnosis and echocardiogram within the last 2 years
  2. NYHA classes I-III, symptomatically stable (for >1month)
  3. Age 21-70 years
  4. Either of Hispanic ethnicity (Mexican American origin) or non-Hispanic white
  5. Patients on ACE inhibitor therapy (lisinopril)
  6. Blood pressure >100/75 mmHg
  7. Adequate birth control
  8. Patients seen in TTUHSC Cardiology or Internal Medicine clinic for at least two visits since January 2008

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute coronary syndrome (within the last month).
  2. Recent acute diastolic or systolic HF (within the last month)
  3. Pancreatic disease
  4. Renal artery stenosis
  5. Pregnancy
  6. History of angioedema
  7. Severe hypotension (systolic BP<90mmHg or mean arterial pressure <65mmHg)
  8. Hyperkalemia (defined by K+>5 mEq/L)
  9. Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 3 and above)
  10. Systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction below 50%)
  11. Ethnicity other than Mexican American or non-Hispanic white

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Drug
Aliskiren plus spironolactone vs. Lisinopril plus spironolactone
Drug: Aliskiren plus spironolactone vs. Lisinopril plus spironolactone
Subjects will be in the study for a total of 8 weeks. Subjects with stable diastolic HF on current ACEI therapy will be randomized into two treatment groups. The study group will receive Aliskiren plus spironolactone and the control group will receive Lisinopril plus spironolactone. These 2 groups will be further divided according to ethnicity: Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites. Sixty patients will be recruited, 30 per treatment group. Subjects will have a 2 week wash-out period. At the end of this period, blood will be collected and subjects will be asked to take the assigned medication once daily for 6 weeks. Subjects will be asked to return every 2 weeks at which time blood pressure, serum potassium and creatinine levels will be assessed. Their medications will be titrated depending on clinical tolerance and symptom control. At the end of 6 weeks of treatment blood markers will be drawn and differences will be analyzed.
Other Names:
  • Tekturna
  • Lisinopril
  • Spironolactone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compare the baseline level of RAAS dysregulation between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites with stable diastolic HF by measuring established biomarkers.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Evaluate the superiority of aliskiren plus spironolactone combination over an lisinopril plus spironolactone combination in inhibiting the RAAS system among patients with diastolic HF.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Compare the clinical and biological benefit of RAAS system inhibition between aliskiren plus spironolactone and lisinopril plus spironolactone as measured by clinical indicators and serum biomarkers
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks
Assess ethnicity-specific differences in the clinical response to either RAAS inhibition treatment between Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites.
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 15, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 16, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ARID-HF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings