Neuropathic Pain Caused by Radiation Therapy (NP)

June 21, 2011 updated by: British Columbia Cancer Agency

Topical Amitriptyline, Ketamine and Lidocaine in Neuropathic Pain Caused by Radiation Skin Reaction: a Pilot Study

To investigate if topical amitriptyline 2%, ketamine 1%, and lidocaine 5% in pluronic lecitine organogel (AKL in PLO gel) can improve management of neuropathic pain from radiation skin reactions adjunctively or better than standard treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Topical amitriptyline and ketamine and topical lidocaine alone have been shown to improve management of neuropathic pain in nonmalignant subjects. Anecdotal experience has shown improvement in use of all three topical drugs combined in radiation skin reactions. There currently is no research evidence for the use of all three compounded interventions. This study aims to target subjects with pain from radiation therapy who are not receiving adequate relief with standard interventions and may be eligible to receive this alternate intervention.
  2. Hypothesis:Topical AKL in PLO gel can effectively and safely reduce neuropathic pain experienced by patients with radiotherapy induced skin reactions.
  3. Justification: Standard treatment of painful radiation skin reactions such as moist desquamation consists of saline soaks, silver sulfadiazine and oral analgesics. However, sometimes the pain exceeds this standard intervention, patients are sulfa allergic or patients are intolerant to oral analgesics such as opioids. AKL in PLO gel is targeted for neuropathic pain and may be used alternatively to standard interventions. The participation rate will help to further estimate the feasibility of a larger sample size study to look at efficacy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8R 6V5
        • BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Island BCCA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age greater or equal to 18 years with ability to provide written informed consent.
  • Subjects currently receiving radiation therapy or having completed radiotherapy in less than 4 weeks from study entry, who have developed skin reactions that are painful.
  • Radiation skin reaction pain has qualities of burning as scored on UWNPS of 1 or more
  • Skin toxicity Assessment Tool showing dry desquamation or worse
  • Presence of objective dynamic allodynia and/or pinprick hyperalgesia as assessed by physician
  • Subjects show less than 1 point decrease in UWNPS after 2 days of using standard intervention.
  • Subjects are allergic or intolerant to standard intervention.
  • Subjects must be available by telephone 2 and 6 weeks after RT treatment is completed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to amitriptyline, ketamine or lidocaine
  • Untreated severe major depression
  • Ongoing use of monoamine oxidase inhibitor
  • Pain from another source as severe or greater than the pain under study
  • Evidence of another type of neuropathic pain not included in this study.
  • Normal cognitive and communicative ability as judged by clinical assessment and ability to complete self-report questionnaires
  • Not pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome measure will to use the validated University of Washington Neuropathic Pain Scale (UWNPS) on all radiation skin reaction subjects requiring standard intervention.
Time Frame: University of Washington Neuropathic Pain scale will be conducted at the time of assessment, every 2-5 days while on radiotherapy, week 2 and 6 weeks post radiotherapy.
University of Washington Neuropathic Pain scale will be conducted at the time of assessment, every 2-5 days while on radiotherapy, week 2 and 6 weeks post radiotherapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Skin Toxicity Assessment Tool (STAT)
Time Frame: Presence of dry desquamation or worse on STAT at baseline assessment, complete STAT 30 minutes post application of cream, every 2-5 days while on radiotherapy, week 2 and 6 weeks after completing radiation therapy.
Presence of dry desquamation or worse on STAT at baseline assessment, complete STAT 30 minutes post application of cream, every 2-5 days while on radiotherapy, week 2 and 6 weeks after completing radiation therapy.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
British Columbia Cancer Agency

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Isabella Uzaraga, MD, BC Cancer Agency - Vancouver Island Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BCCA001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings