Study of CC-5013 to Evaluate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Effectiveness for Japanese Patients With Symptomatic Anemia Associated With Myelodysplastic Syndrome With a Del(5)(q31-33) Abnormality.

November 6, 2019 updated by: Celgene

A Multicenter, Single-arm Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Lenalidomide in Japanese Subjects With Low- or Intern=Mediate-1-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Associated With a Deletion 5 (q31-33) Abnormality and Symptomatic Anemia

The purpose of this clinical experience study is to determine whether CC-5013 is safe and effective (to include studying the process by which a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and eliminated by the body [pharmacokinetics]) in Japanese subjects with low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS (IPSS risk categories) associated with a deletion 5(q31-33) abnormality and symptomatic anemia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
11

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Hiroshima, Japan, 734-8551
        • Celgene Clinical Site
      • Kyoto, Japan, 601-1495
        • Celgene Clinical Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 543-8555
        • Celgene Clinical Site
      • Shizuoka, Japan, 420-8527
        • Celgene Clinical Site
    • Tochigi
      • Shimono, Tochigi, Japan, 329-0498
        • Celgene Clinical Site
    • Tokyo
      • Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 150-8935
        • Celgene Clinical Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
  • Age ≥ 20 years at the time of signing the informed consent form.
  • Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  • Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) that meets International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) criteria for low- or intermediate-1-risk disease associated with a deletion 5(q31-33) abnormality
  • Symptomatic anemia secondary to MDS defined as:Untransfused Hb level < 10.0 g/dL and a Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-anemia subscale score of ≤ 74 or Transfusion dependent anemia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
  • Prior therapy with lenalidomide.
  • Patients with any of the following laboratory abnormalities within 14 days of starting study drug: Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 750 cells/μL (0.75 x 10^9/L) Platelet count < 50,000/μL (50x10^9/L) Serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) > 3.0 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lenalidomide
Oral 10mg daily on Days 1-21 days every 28 days until disease progression/relapse or CC-5013 is permanently discontinued for any reason for up to 156 weeks (3 years).
Drug: Lenalidomide
Oral 10mg daily on Days 1-21 days every 28 days until disease progression/relapse or CC-5013 is permanently discontinued for any reason for up to 156 weeks (3 years).
Other Names:
  • CC-5013

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: After the first study dose until 28 days after completion of/discontinuation from the study (maximum time on study was 155 weeks).

An AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes was defined as a serious adverse event (SAE):

  • Death;
  • Life-threatening event;
  • Any inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
  • Persistent or significant disability or incapacity;
  • Congenital anomaly or birth defect;
  • Any other important medical event.

The investigator determined the relationship of an AE to study drug based on the timing of the AE relative to drug administration and whether or not other drugs, therapeutic interventions, or underlying conditions could provide a sufficient explanation for the event.

The severity of an AE was evaluated by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) (Version 3.0) where Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening and Grade 5 = Death.
After the first study dose until 28 days after completion of/discontinuation from the study (maximum time on study was 155 weeks).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Maximum observed plasma concentration of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day and after multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Time to maximum observed plasma concentration of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day 1 and multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUCt) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUCt) of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day 1 and multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUCτ) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day 1 and multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC∞) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Day 1 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day 1.
Day 1 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hours post-dose.
Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
The apparent terminal half-life is the time required for plasma concentration to decrease by 50% after pseudo-equilibrium of distribution has been reached, and calculated as the natural logarithm of 2 (0.693) / Apparent terminal rate constant (λz).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (VzF) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Apparent volume of distribution of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day 1 and multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Apparent Total Plasma Clearance (CL/F) of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F) of lenalidomide after a single dose on Day 1 and multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Apparent Terminal Elimination Rate Constant of Lenalidomide
Time Frame: Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Apparent terminal elimination rate constant of lenalidomide determined after a single dose on Day 1 and multiple doses (Day 4).
Days 1 and 4 at predose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 hours post-dose.
Number of Participants With a Erythroid Response
Time Frame: Response was assessed every 28 days through Week 156.

Erythroid response was determined using the International Working Group (IWG) 2000 criteria, categorized as a major response or minor response.

A major response in patients with transfusion-dependent anemia (receiving ≥ 4.5 units of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during 56 consecutive days at Baseline) is defined as RBC transfusion independence accompanied by a ≥1.0 g/dL increase from Baseline in hemoglobin sustained for 56 days consecutively during the treatment period. In patients with transfusion-independent anemia with hemoglobin < 10 g/dL at Baseline a major response is defined as a > 2.0 g/dL increase from Baseline in hemoglobin sustained for consecutive 56 days.

Minor response in patients with transfusion-dependent anemia defined as ≥ 50% decrease from Baseline in transfusion requirements sustained for consecutive 56 days, and in transfusion-independent patients as 1.0 to 2.0 g/dL increase from Baseline in hemoglobin sustained for consecutive 56 days.
Response was assessed every 28 days through Week 156.
Time to Erythroid Response
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug through Week 156
Time to erythroid response was calculated as the time from the first dose of study drug to the start of the first major or minor erythroid response. Similarly, time to major erythroid response was calculated as the time from the first dose of study drug to the start of the first major erythroid response.
From the first dose of study drug through Week 156
Duration of Erythroid Response
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug through Week 156
Duration of erythroid response was calculated as the time from the start of the first major or minor erythroid response to the end of the response. Similarly, duration of major erythroid response was calculated as the time from the start of the first major erythroid response to the end of the response. Response duration was censored at the last adequate assessment for patients who maintained response.
From the first dose of study drug through Week 156
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and from Day1 until the maximum observed value (up to 155 weeks)
Change in hemoglobin concentration from Baseline to the maximum observed value during the major erythroid response period for major erythroid responders.
Baseline and from Day1 until the maximum observed value (up to 155 weeks)
Number of Participants With a Neutrophil Response
Time Frame: Response was assessed every 28 days through Week 156

Neutrophil response was determined using the IWG (2000) criteria. A major response for participants with a Baseline neutrophil count < 1,500/mm^3 is defined as a ≥ 100% increase or a ≥ 500/mm^3 increase, whichever is greater, sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period.

A minor response for participants with a Baseline neutrophil count < 1,500/mm^3 is defined as a ≥ 100% increase, but an absolute increase < 500/mm^3, sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period.
Response was assessed every 28 days through Week 156
Number of Participants With a Platelet Response
Time Frame: Response was assessed every 28 days through Week 156

Platelet response was determined using the IWG (2000) criteria. Major response in patients with Baseline platelet count < 100,000/mm^3 is defined as a ≥ 30,000/mm^3 increase sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period. In platelet-transfusion-dependent patients at Baseline a major response is defined as stabilization of platelet counts and platelet transfusion independence sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period.

Minor response in patients with Baseline platelet count < 100,000/mm^3 is defined as a ≥ 50% increase in platelet count with an absolute increase > 10,000/mm^3 and < 30,000/mm^3 sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period.
Response was assessed every 28 days through Week 156
Number of Participants With a Cytogenetic Response
Time Frame: Response was assessed every 12 weeks through Week 156

Cytogenetic (chromosome structure) abnormalities were assessed by a central cytogenetic reviewer based on prints and cytogenetic reports of the bone marrow sample from the central laboratory. Cytogenetic response was determined using the IWG (2000) criteria and categorized as either a major response or minor response. Twenty metaphases were analyzed for the determination of cytogenetic response.

A major response was defined as no detectable cytogenetic abnormality, if an abnormality was present at Baseline, sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period. A minor response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline in abnormal metaphases sustained for consecutive 56 days during the treatment period.
Response was assessed every 12 weeks through Week 156
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Bone Marrow Erythroblasts
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of Cycle 3 (Day 85) and Cycle 6 (Day 169).
Bone marrow morphology was assessed by the central hematologic reviewers based on the locally-prepared bone marrow smear slide and clot section.
Baseline, at the end of Cycle 3 (Day 85) and Cycle 6 (Day 169).
Percentage of Bone Marrow Myeloblasts
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of Cycle 3 (Day 85) and Cycle 6 (Day 169).
Bone marrow morphology was assessed by the central hematologic reviewers based on the locally-prepared bone marrow smear slide and clot section.
Baseline, at the end of Cycle 3 (Day 85) and Cycle 6 (Day 169).
Percentage of Bone Marrow Promyelocytes
Time Frame: Baseline, at the end of Cycle 3 (Day 85) and Cycle 6 (Day 169).
Bone marrow morphology was assessed by the central hematologic reviewers based on the locally-prepared bone marrow smear slide and clot section.
Baseline, at the end of Cycle 3 (Day 85) and Cycle 6 (Day 169).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Celgene

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Masaaki Takatoku, MD, Celgene Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CC-5013-MDS-007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Lenalidomide

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings