Heated Humidified Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Physiology

April 8, 2010 updated by: University of Athens

Randomized Cross-over Trials of the Effect of Heated Humidified CPAP Versus Non-humidified CPAP on Nasal Physiology

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure can cause nasal side effects which can compromise compliance to therapy. Humidifiers can attenuate this effect. However, the mechanism by which humidified CPAP alleviates nasal symptoms has never been assessed objectively in OSA patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the effect of humidified CPAP on nasal airway physiology with combined measurements of nasal resistance and level of inflammatory markers. The investigators' hypothesis is that the addition of heated humidification in CPAP decreases nasal airway resistance and nasal mucosal inflammation markers and thus, ameliorates nasal symptoms of OSAS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Introduction-Rationale:

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered to be the "gold standard" of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) treatment [1]. The most common side effects are nasal congestion, stuffiness or dryness and rhinorrhea which have been reported in up to 68% of patients responding to a questionnaire about nasal CPAP. In many of them, CPAP compliance is accordingly compromised.

The mechanisms by which CPAP provokes nasal symptoms have been thoroughly studied only in healthy volunteers and a rodent model. Indeed, Richards et al demonstrated that mouth leaks causing high unidirectional nasal airflow increased nasal airway resistance and this response could be largely prevented by heated humidification of the inspired air. Similarly, Togias et al showed an elevated release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, prostaglandin D2, kinins) in nasal wash fluids when compressed cold and dry air was delivered through the nose. This effect was also prevented when warm and moist air was delivered. More recently, Almendros et al provided evidence that CPAP use in rats triggered early nasal inflammation.

Of the variety of methods used to treat nasal symptoms during CPAP treatment, the most common is humidification of the inspired air. However, the mechanism Oby which humidified CPAP attenuates nasal symptoms has never been assessed objectively in OSA patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the effect of humidified CPAP on nasal airway physiology with combined measurements of nasal resistance and level of inflammatory markers. Our hypothesis is that the addition of heated humidification in CPAP decreases nasal airway resistance and nasal mucosal inflammation markers and thus, ameliorates nasal symptoms of OSAS patients.

Study design:

BASELINE: 1. NASAL SYMPTOMS 2. NASAL RESISTANCE 3. NASAL WASH (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-a, IL-10)

3 weeks humidified CPAP --------------> 3 weeks non-humidified CPAP <--------------

AFTER TREATMENT: 1. NASAL SYMPTOMS 2. NASAL RESISTANCE 3. NASAL WASH (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-a, IL-10)

Methods:

  1. Nasal symptoms will be assessed using a five point Nasal Score. Each of the five principal nasal symptoms of rhinorrhoea, post-nasal drip, sneezing, impaired sense of smell and nasal blockage will be binary coded as present/increased over baseline (1) or absent/not (0) and summed to yield a total Nasal Score between zero and five.
  2. Nasal resistance will be assessed by active anterior and posterior rhinomanometry in both seated and supine (for 10 min) positions.
  3. Nasal wash will be performed using a technique adapted by Hurst et al. Briefly, a 12-French Foley catheter (Bard, Crawley, UK), modified by removal of the tip distal to the balloon, was inserted into the nostril and inflated with sufficient air to form a comfortable seal (typically 7-10ml). With the patients head flexed 45o forward, 7ml of warmed 0.9% saline will be instilled through the catheter and washed in and out of the nasal cavity three times. A portion of the pooled wash from both nostrils will be centrifuged to yield a supernatant for analysis of inflammatory cytokines.

By this protocol, the following are expected: a) the reason for potential congestion and inflammatory response is cold and dry air passing through the nostrils (mechanical irritation cannot be the reason, as the pressure is equivalent in both sessions), and b) heated and humidified CPAP prevents (and not treats) nasal congestion.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
      • Athens, Greece, 10675
        • Department of Critical Care and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects who refer to the Center of Sleep Disorders of "Evangelismos" General Hospital of Athens for suspected sleep disordered breathing.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome defined as apnea/hypopnoea index greater than 20,
  2. Initiation of continuous positive airway pressure, and
  3. Symptomatic nasal obstruction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No medication known to influence nasal resistance (antihistamines, vasoconstrictors, vasodilators, topical or systemic steroids, and recreation drugs),
  2. No smoking,
  3. No upper or lower respiratory tract disease (e.g. upper respiratory tract infection, rhinitis, sinusitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), including a history of nasal allergy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Athens

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ioannis Koutsourelakis, MD, 1Center of Sleep Disorders Medical School of Athens University, Department of Critical Care and Pulmonary Services

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 25, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 9, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 8, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UOA-12008

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings