Low Versus High Pressure Suction Drainage After Total Knee Arthroplasty
"Low Versus High Pressure Suction Drainage After Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial"
Principal hypothesis:
A low suction drainage (-50 mmHg) reduce a 25% the blood loss with respect a standard closed drainage (-700 mmHg) following total knee arthroplasty.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Secondary's hypothesis:
It don't expect differences in:
- Incidence of hematomas
- Incidence in surgery wound infection
- Time of immobilization
- Duration of hospitalization
- The low suction drainage (-50 mmHg) will be more cost-effective than the standard closed drainage (-700 mmHg)
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Catalunya
-
Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08025
- Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
-
Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain, 08025
- Orthopedic and Traumatology Service. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult knee replacement patients who agreed to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- People that not accomplished the inclusion criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low suction drainage
In the experimental group the drainage catheter was connected to a modified DRENOFAST® system.
This system consisted of a sterile plastic bottle with a holding capacity of 600 mL of fluid and a negative pressure of 700mmHg.
It was hermetically closed and had two connections.
The DRENOFAST® modification consisted of establishing an open connection between the bottle and a wall vacuum source (normally used to administer oxygen) placed next to the patient's bed.
The 50 mmHg constant negative pressure of the bottle was maintained by the wall vacuum source and verified by flow meter.
|
In the experimental group the drainage catheter was connected to a modified DRENOFAST® system.
This system consisted of a sterile plastic bottle with a holding capacity of 600 mL of fluid and a negative pressure of 700mmHg.
It was hermetically closed and had two connections.
The DRENOFAST® modification consisted of establishing an open connection between the bottle and a wall vacuum source (normally used to administer oxygen) placed next to the patient's bed.
The 50 mmHg constant negative pressure of the bottle was maintained by the wall vacuum source and verified by flow meter.
Duration: Drains were removed after bleeding had ceased (48-72h).
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: High suction drainage
The standard DRENOFAST® system was used in the control group, and the initial negative pressure was 700 mmHg.
|
In order to mask the type of intervention from the patient and the investigators, both drainage systems had two drain catheters.
One catheter allowed the blood to flow from the wound to the bottle.
The second catheter connected the bottle to the vacuum source.
In the experimental arm the second catheter was open, while in the control group it was closed.
So that the system used could not be distinguished, the connection of the second catheter to the bottle was covered with opaque adhesive tape.Drains were removed after bleeding had ceased.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
total post-surgical blood loss (mL)
Time Frame: from the moment after surgery until drainage catheter removal
|
from the moment after surgery until drainage catheter removal
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
blood loss (mL) in the recovery unit
Time Frame: 24-48 h
|
24-48 h
|
|
Blood loss in the ward
Time Frame: 5-10 days
|
5-10 days
|
|
need for a blood transfusion according to the surgeon's criteria
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
number of blood units required for transfusion
Time Frame: 10 Days
|
10 Days
|
|
post-surgical pain (using a 100mm visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
incidence of hematomas
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
infections
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
suture dehiscence
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
re-intervention due to complications in the surgical wound
Time Frame: 10 dasy
|
10 dasy
|
|
venous thrombosis
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
hypotension
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
mortality
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
|
adverse reactions
Time Frame: 10 days
|
10 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Calvo Rafael, Rn, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DRENAJE50MMHG/1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.