Raltegravir and Atazanavir Dosing Strategy Study (SPARTA)

April 10, 2012 updated by: Kirby Institute

A Randomised, Open-label, Cross-over Study to Examine the Pharmacokinetics and Short-term Safety and Efficacy of Two Dosing Strategies of Raltegravir Plus Atazanavir in HIV-infected Patients

To compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics and short-term efficacy and safety of two dosing strategies of raltegravir and atazanavir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults receiving atazanavir-containing combination antiretroviral therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Current HIV treatment guidelines recommend the construction of combination regimens comprising a minimum of three agents from at least two drug classes. There are problems with the current recommendations for although treatments are effective, their success is often limited by tolerability, adverse effects and the need to take many pills. Antiretroviral adherence remains vital and regimens should be simplified wherever possible to facilitate maximal adherence. The recent availability of the potent HIV integrase inhibitor, raltegravir, provides an opportunity to explore moves away from current regimen components. Evidence to support the use of novel regimens must be generated through adequately powered randomized clinical trials. However, before such trials can be undertaken, preliminary data to define the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of these regimens are needed to minimize unnecessary risk for participants. This eight week study will investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics, and short-term safety and efficacy of two dosing strategies (once and twice daily) of raltegravir plus atazanavir in treatment experienced HIV-infected adults.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
        • Holdsworth House Medical Practice
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
        • St Vincent's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged ≥ 18 years with laboratory evidence of HIV-1 infection
  • currently receiving 3 or more unchanged antiretroviral agents including atazanavir (with or without ritonavir boosting) for at least 24 weeks prior to study entry
  • plasma HIV RNA less than 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to study entry
  • provide written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria :

  • prior clinical/virological failure on a PI-containing regimen
  • no clinical history of primary HIV-1 protease mutations identified in local baseline genotypic analysis of HIV with interpretation using current IAS-USA Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1
  • women: pregnant, breastfeeding, or not willing to use adequate contraception (including barrier contraception) if of child-bearing potential

  • laboratory abnormalities at screening:

    • absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 750 cells/mL
    • haemoglobin less than 8.5 g/dL
    • platelet count less than 50 000 cells/mL
    • AST, ALT > 5 times the upper limit of normal
    • serum bilirubin > 5 times the upper limit of normal
  • chronic active hepatitis B infection defined by presence of serum viral hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA-positive
  • any malabsorption syndrome likely to affect drug absorption
  • concurrent therapy with human growth hormone or other immunomodulatory agents
  • concomitant medication contraindicated for use with either atazanavir or raltegravir therapy
  • any inter-current illness requiring hospitalisation
  • current excessive alcohol or illicit substance use
  • unlikely to be able to remain in follow-up for the protocol-defined period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Arm A
Drug: atazanavir plus raltegravir
atazanavir 300 mg + raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 4 weeks then atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg + raltegravir 800 mg once daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Isentress
  • Reyataz
Drug: atazanavir plus raltegravir
atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg + raltegravir 800 mg once daily for 4 weeks then atazanavir 300 mg + raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Isentress
  • Reyataz
Active Comparator: Arm B
Drug: atazanavir plus raltegravir
atazanavir 300 mg + raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 4 weeks then atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg + raltegravir 800 mg once daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Isentress
  • Reyataz
Drug: atazanavir plus raltegravir
atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg + raltegravir 800 mg once daily for 4 weeks then atazanavir 300 mg + raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Isentress
  • Reyataz

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
comparison of the mean steady-state atazanavir trough plasma concentrations for once (C24) and twice (C12) daily dosing strategies
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
4 and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
comparison of mean steady-state raltegravir trough plasma concentrations for once (C24) and twice (C12) daily dosing
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
4 and 8 weeks
comparison of steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles of once and twice-daily atazanavir
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
4 and 8 weeks
comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles of once and twice-daily raltegravir
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
4 and 8 weeks
change from baseline in fasting lipid and glycaemic parameters
Time Frame: weeks 4 and 8 and overall
weeks 4 and 8 and overall
change from baseline in CD4+ T-lymphocyte count
Time Frame: weeks 4 and 8 and overall
weeks 4 and 8 and overall
change from baseline in HIV-RNA
Time Frame: weeks 4 and 8 and overall
weeks 4 and 8 and overall
all adverse events attributable to study treatment
Time Frame: week 8
week 8
all serious, grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events, and any adverse event leading to premature cessation of study treatment
Time Frame: week 8
week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kirby Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David A Cooper, MD DSc, Kirby Institute, UNSW

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 31, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SPARTA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings