Darbepoetin Alfa and Anemia of Cancer

December 11, 2013 updated by: Amgen

A Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Study to Estimate the Effect of Darbepoetin Alfa on Hospital Days, Economic Outcomes, and Health-related Quality of Life in Subjects With Nonmyeloid Malignancies and Anemia of Cancer

This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative study was designed to determine the effect of darbepoetin alfa on hospital days, economic outcomes, and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in anemic patients with nonmyeloid malignancies who were not receiving chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned in a 4:1 allocation ratio to receive either 21 weeks of darbepoetin alfa treatment (treatment group) or 12 weeks of observation followed by up to 9 weeks of darbepoetin alfa treatment (observation group).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
287

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • nonmyeloid malignancies (including lymphocytic leukemias)
  • anemia (hemoglobin concentration less than or equal to 11.0 g/dL) due to cancer and/or previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2
  • adequate liver and renal functions
  • 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of recombinant human erythropoietin therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or more than 30 Gy radiotherapy to the whole pelvis within 4 weeks before screening
  • acute myelogenous leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome
  • known hematologic disorders that could cause anemia
  • inflammatory or cardiac disorders
  • previous positive antibody response to any erythropoietic agent
  • history of pure red cell aplasia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Observational Group
Participants in the observation group were evaluated once every 2 weeks for the first 12 weeks (test period). No darbepoetin alfa was administered to the observation group during this period. Darbepoetin alfa could be initiated at a dose of 3.0 μg/kg once every 2 weeks beginning with the first visit after the test period at which the participants hemoglobin concentration was less than or equal to 11.0 g/dL. The dose of darbepoetin alfa could be increased to 5.0 μg/kg once every 2 weeks after 6 weeks of darbepoetin alfa treatment in participants with a hemoglobin change from baseline of less than 1.0 g/dL.
Biological: darbepoetin alfa
Administered subcutaneously.
Other Names:
  • Aranesp®
Active Comparator: 21 week treatment group
Participants in the treatment group received darbepoetin alfa subcutaneously (SC) at a dose of 3.0 μg/kg once every 2 weeks for 21 weeks. The dose of darbepoetin alfa could be increased at week 7 (to 5.0 μg/kg once every 2 weeks) or at week 13 (to 9.0 μg/kg once every 2 weeks) in participants with a hemoglobin change from baseline of less than 1.0 g/dL who dose escalated at week 7.
Biological: darbepoetin alfa
Administered subcutaneously.
Other Names:
  • Aranesp®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Hospitalized During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1- 12
Number of participants hospitalized during Weeks 1-12 as self-reported in the Health Care Utilization portion of the Subject Outcome Questionaire.
Weeks 1- 12
Days of Hospitalization During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
Number of days hospitalized during Weeks 1-12 as self-reported in the Health Care Utilization portion of the Subject Outcome Questionaire; participants who were not hospitalized had a value of 0 days.
Weeks 1-12
Number of Hospitalizations During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
Number of times participants were hospitalized as self-reported in the Health Care Utilization portion of the Subject Outcome Questionaire during Weeks 1-12
Weeks 1-12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Hospital Costs During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The hospital bill database was used to determine the mean total hospital cost per participant during the test period. Participants who were not hospitalized had a cost of $0 imputed.
Weeks 1-12
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Fatigue Score at Week 13
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1) and Week 13
The FACT-Fatigue scale comprises 13 questions evaluating the impact of anemia on cancer patients with various tumor types receiving chemotherapy. Fatigue scores range from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating less fatigue.
Baseline (Week 1) and Week 13
Hemoglobin Response During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The number of participants achieving a hemoglobin response, defined as an increase in hemoglobin from baseline of ≥ 2.0 g/dL in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during the preceding 28 days.
Weeks 1-12
Hematopoietic Response During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The number of participants achieving a hematopoietic response, defined as an increase in hemoglobin from baseline of ≥ 2.0 g/dL or a concentration ≥ 12.0 g/dL both in the absence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during the preceding 28 days.
Weeks 1-12
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1) and Week 13
The difference between hemoglobin concentrations after 12 weeks of treatment and the Baseline hemoglobin concentration value (Study Day 1 sample prior to first dose of darbepoetin alfa).
Baseline (Week 1) and Week 13
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
Number of participants with at least one RBC transfusion during Weeks 1 to 12.
Weeks 1-12
Number of Units of Red Blood Cells Transfused During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The average number of standard units of red blood cells transfused during Weeks 1 to 12.
Weeks 1-12
Number of Days of Red Blood Cell Transfusions During the Test Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-12
The number of days when at least one red blood cell transfusion was administered during Weeks 1 to 12.
Weeks 1-12
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions During Weeks 5-12
Time Frame: Weeks 5-12
The number of participants with at least one RBC transfusion during weeks 5 to 12.
Weeks 5-12
Number of Units of Red Blood Cells Transfused During Weeks 5-12
Time Frame: Weeks 5-12
The number of standard units of RBCs transfused during Weeks 5 to 12.
Weeks 5-12
Number of Days of Red Blood Cell Transfusions During Weeks 5-12
Time Frame: Weeks 5-12
The number of days when at least one RBC transfusion was administered during Weeks 5 to 12.
Weeks 5-12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20000219

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings