Plerixafor in Treating Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Lenalidomide and Planning to Undergo Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

April 24, 2015 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Phase II Trial of Intravenously Administered AMD3100 (Plerixafor) for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Following a Lenalidomide Based Initial Therapy

Rationale: Giving colony-stimulating factors, such as G-CSF and plerixafor helps stem cells move from the patient's bone marrow to the blood so they can be collected and stored. Purpose: This phase II trial is studying how well plerixafor works in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide and planning to undergo autologous stem cell transplant.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Primary Objective: I. To determine the proportion of patients reaching a stem cell yield of 3 million CD34 cells/kg by second day of apheresis with intravenously administered AMD3100 among patients receiving primary therapy for myeloma with lenalidomide. Secondary Objectives: I. Safety and tolerability of intravenously administered AMD3100. II. Rate of failure to mobilize. Outline: Patients receive plerixafor IV on days 5-8 and filgrastim subcutaneously on days 1-8 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 30 days.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion - Absolute neutrophil count >= 1000/uL - Platelet >= 75000/uL - Hemoglobin >= 8.0 g/dL - Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) and total bilirubin < 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) - Confirmed diagnosis of multiple myeloma, requiring therapy - Initial treatment for symptomatic myeloma using a lenalidomide based treatment regimen, started =< 12 months prior to registration - Received at least 2 cycles of treatment with the lenalidomide regimen - Last dose of lenalidomide > 2 weeks prior to registration - Eligible to undergo autologous transplantation - ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1 - Willingness to return for follow-up - Provide informed written consent - Adequate cardiopulmonary function: ejection fraction >= 45%, corrected pulmonary diffusion capacity of >= 50%, FEV1 >= 50%, FVC >= 50% - Negative serum or urine pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only Exclusion - A co-morbid condition which, in the view of the Investigators, renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications - Active malignancy with the exception of non melanoma skin cancer or in situ cervical or breast cancer - Other co-morbidity which would interfere with patient's ability to participate in the trial, e.g. uncontrolled infection, uncompensated heart or lung disease - Other concurrent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or any ancillary therapy considered investigational - Use of cyclophosphamide as part of stem cell mobilization - Use of more than one regimen for treatment of symptomatic myeloma - Dialysis dependent renal failure - Pregnant women or women of reproductive ability who are unwilling to use effective contraception - Nursing women - Men who are unwilling to use a condom (even if they have undergone a prior vasectomy) while having intercourse with any woman, while taking the drug and for 4 weeks after stopping treatment - Acute infection, active HIV infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Plerixafor

Plerixafor 160mg/kg/dose by IV on days 5-8

Filgrastim (G-CSF) 10 mg/kg/dose subcutaneously on days 1-8.
Drug: plerixafor
Plerixafor 160mg/kg/dose by IV on days 5-8
Other Names:
  • Mozobil
  • AMD 3100
  • LM-3100
Drug: filgrastim
Filgrastim (G-CSF) 10 mg/kg/dose subcutaneously on days 1-8.
Other Names:
  • G-CSF
  • r-metHuG-CSF
  • Neupogen
  • Recombinant Methionyl Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor
  • granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Achieving 3 Million CD34 Cells/kg After 2 Days of Apheresis
Time Frame: After 2 days of apheresis

Number of CD34 cells/kg collected on days 1-2.

Apheresis is the process when blood is taken out through a catheter in a vein in one arm, blood is sent through a machine that takes out the stem cells and the rest of the blood is then returned through a vein in your other arm.
After 2 days of apheresis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CD34 Yield on Day 1
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of CD34 cells/kg collected on day 1.
Day 1
CD34 Yield Day 2
Time Frame: Day 2
Number of CD34 cells/kg collected on day 2
Day 2
Median Number of Days of Apheresis
Time Frame: Duration of apheresis (up to 7 days)
Duration of apheresis (up to 7 days)
Time to Reach 6 Million CD34 Cells
Time Frame: Duration of apheresis (up to 7 days)
Number (median and 95% confidence interval) of days to reach 6 million CD34 cells/kg was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Participants were lower than 6 million CD34 cells/kg at time of last follow-up will be censored at that date.
Duration of apheresis (up to 7 days)
Rate of Failure to Mobilize
Time Frame: Duration of apheresis (up to 7 days)
The rate of failure to mobilize will be estimated by dividing the number of patients that fail to mobilize by the total number of evaluable patients. A patient is considered a failure if they never achieve 2.5 million CD34 cells/kg.
Duration of apheresis (up to 7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph R. Mikhael, M.D., Mayo Clinic
  • Study Chair: Shaji Kumar, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MC0889 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2009-01328 (Registry Identifier: NCI-CTRP)
  • 08-005644 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic IRB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings