Dose Escalation of Interleukin-1 (IL-7) Added on Antiviral Treatment and Vaccination in HBeAg-negative Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infected Patients (CONVERT)

October 17, 2012 updated by: Cytheris SA

A Phase Randomized Open Labelled Controlled Dose Escalation Study of Repeated Administration of "CYT107" (Glyco-r-hIL-7) Added on Antiviral Treatment and Vaccination in HBeAg-negative Chronic Hepatitis B-infected Patients

This study is designed to evaluate the safety of biological active dose of a new experimental drug, IL-7, in combination with anti viral therapy and vaccine in patients with Hepatitis B chronic infection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a Phase I/IIa inter-patient dose-escalation study assessing weekly doses of Interleukin-7 (CYT107) in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B infected adult patients. The dose escalation is aimed at establishing the safety of a biologically active doses of CYT107 added to the current antiviral therapy with entecavir or tenofovir and vaccination or not. At each dose level, study patients will receive one subcutaneous administration of CYT107 per week for a total of 4.

Groups of 8 patients will be entered at each dose level of CYT107. Three dose levels are planned.

At each dose level, patients are randomized between 2 arms of treatment: tritherapy (CYT107, vaccine and antiviral treatment) or bitherapy (CYT107 and vaccine). Each treatment group is composed of 4 patients, 3 receiving experimental treatments, 1 just the current antiviral treatment (control patient).

According to the treatment arm, eligible patients initially receive a vaccine if in treatment group of tritherapy, thereafter, CYT107 is added for a cycle of four weekly injections (if not a control patient) at a defined dose level. If in treatment group of tritherapy, patients will receive 2 additional doses of vaccine.

The treatment phase for the tritherapy group is from first vaccine D0 to last vaccine W12 and includes CYT107 administration from W4 to W7.

The treatment phase for the bitehrapy group is from W4 to W7 corresponding to CYT104 injections.

The patients are then followed on a regular basis until reaching 52 weeks after the D0.

Participants will have 1 overnight hospitalization and 12 clinic visit on a period of 55 weeks.

During the visits the following may be done:

  • medical history, physical examination, blood tests
  • electrocardiograms (ECG)
  • chest X-Ray
  • liver/spleen imaging
  • urine tests

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Creteil, France
        • Hopital Henri Mendor-Service d'HepatoGastroEnterologie
      • Grenoble, France
        • Hopital Michallon
      • Lyon, France
        • Hôpital de l'Hôtel Dieu
      • Marseille, France
        • Hôpital Saint Joseph
      • Nice, France
        • Chu L'Archet
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Tenon
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Hôpital Civil
  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic HBV-infected patients
  • HBeAg-negative patients
  • Age > 18 years
  • Patients with active chronic hepatitis at the start of the antiviral treatment
  • Patient with a HBV DNA undetectable (<70 copies/ml) stable for at least 3 months under entecavir or tenofovir treatment.
  • Ongoing treatment by entecavir or tenofovir at screening Note: previous treatment with pegylated IFN monotherapy, before the start of entecavir or tenofovir, is acceptable

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection by HCV
  • Infection by HIV-1 and /or HIV-2
  • Apart from HBV infection, presence of active infection requiring a specific treatment or a hospitalization
  • Previous treatment by lamivudine and/or nucleosides analogues
  • Inactive carrier
  • Cirrhosis
  • Other liver disease (notably from alcoholic, metabolic or immunological origin)
  • History of clinical autoimmune disease or active auto-immune disease
  • Type I diabetes mellitus
  • Severe asthma, presently on chronic medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Tritherapy: CYT107+ vaccine+ antiviral
Drug: CYT107+GenHevac+entecavir or tenofovir
4 patients per arm for each dose level. 3 patients receiving experimental treatment (CYT107 and vaccine) in addition to current antiviral treatment and 1 control patient only the current antiviral treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Bitherapy: CYT107 + antiviral
Drug: CYT107+ entecavir or tenofovir
4 patients per arm for each dose level. 3 patients receiving experimental treatment (CYT107) in addition to current antiviral treatment and 1 control patient only the current antiviral treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the short and long-term safety and biological activity of CYT107 in patients with a HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who have, at screening a HBV DNA undetectable stable for at least 3 months with antiviral treatment.
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of CYT107 in humans chronically infected with HBV.
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12
To assess the effects of the tri-therapy (CYT107 + HBV vaccine + antiviral treatment) versus bi-therapy (CYT107 + antiviral treatment) versus control (antiviral treatment) on the markers of the HBV infection (antiviral activity)at W16 weeks and W52
Time Frame: Week 12 and Week 52
Week 12 and Week 52
To quantify the effects of the tri-therapy (CYT107 + HBV vaccine + antiviral treatment) versus bi-therapy (CYT107 + antiviral treatment) versus control (antiviral treatment) on the immune system at W16 weeks
Time Frame: Week 16
Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cytheris SA

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Christophe Hezode, Hôpital Henri Mondor-Créteil-France
  • Principal Investigator: Pietro Andreone, S. Orsola Malpighi- Bologna-Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CLI-107-10
  • 2009-010709-35 (OTHER: EUDRACT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings