Evaluation the Diagnostic Ability of the Cancer Detection Technology (CDT) to Detect Breast Cancer Among Women Population Over Age 40

January 5, 2010 updated by: Hadassah Medical Organization

Evaluation the Diagnostic Ability of the CDT to Detect Breast Cancer Among Women Population Over Age 40

This study aimed to validate the diagnostic ability of the CDT (cancer detection technology) software to detect breast cancer among women population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Breast cancer diagnosis is a rapidly expanding research field, whose early-stage detection may reduce the burden of the disease and permit more effective treatment. It is well documented that tumor growth requires specific conditions for its development from the occurrence of a mutation to a clinically detectable cancer. It has been shown that living peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) have different ability of cytosolic enzymes (esterases) to convert hydrophobic substrate fluorescein diacetate (FDA) into hydrophilic fluorescent fluorescein. It depends on PBMC cycle stage, size, surface state, physiological states, such as activation and apoptosis.

The important step of breast cancer genesis is the early change of functional activity of cytosolic enzymes (esterases) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Such transformations in PBMC may be detected accurately by an existing device Flowcytometer (FACS™ MultiSET™ System, company "Becton Dickinson" GmbH, USA), where measurements of fluorescence polarization and enzymatic hydrolysis of FDA substrate are recorded. A conclusion about presentation of breast cancer among examined women is achieved by "CDT" (cancer detection technology) software, which analyzes mathematically the results of fluorescence polarization and enzymatic hydrolysis.

Moreover, the combined biochemical model together with additional prognostic parameters (such as age, ethnic group, gynecological and obstetric anamnesis) increases the validity (accuracy, sensitivity and specificity) of the diagnostic conclusion.

Diagnostic Solution of the CDT:

  1. Mathematical processing of specific blood analysis in device Flowcytometer.
  2. Mathematical evaluation of specific prognostic parameters

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Breast cancer patients over age 40 before treatment. Healthy women recruited in Check Up institute from asymptomatic women over age 40, referred to screening mammography and received the negative result of mammography.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria for Breast Cancer Patients for Experimental Group:

  1. Patient is over the age of 40.
  2. Patient is willing to participate as evidenced by signing the written informed consent form.
  3. Patient referred to the Department of Oncology/ Surgery for operative treatment of breast cancer with previously detected disease. Positive conventional tests finding can include (but not limited to) the record of screening or diagnostic mammography, blood oncomarkers, breast ultrasound, breast CT, biopsy.
  4. Non-treated patients (w/o previous chemotherapy, hormonal drugs and radiotherapy).
  5. Patient without other cancer locations

Inclusion Criteria for Presumably Healthy Subjects for Control Group:

  1. Subjects over the age of 40.
  2. Subjects who are willing to participate as evidenced by signing the written informed consent form.
  3. Subjects who are presumably healthy and without breast pathologies' symptoms and family history of breast cancer, i.e., breast disease (except history of functional breast problems, e.g., mastitis within lactation period) has been ruled out based on physician anamnesis
  4. Subjects with negative results of screening mammography.
  5. Subjects without taking of any hormonal medicines

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with any known cancer in other internal organs or systems.
  2. Subjects with high fever presentation (more than 38.5).
  3. Subjects with known breast disease undergoing treatment for the disease.
  4. Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Healthy Control Group
Breast Cancer Patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To validate the diagnostic ability of the CDT to detect breast cancer among women population over age 40
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To correlate the technology with standard test - screening mammography and biopsy
Time Frame: two years
two years
To validate and compare the diagnostic ability of the CDT for detection of breast cancer
Time Frame: two years
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hadassah Medical Organization

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tamar Peretz, MD, Hadassah Medical Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 6, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 6, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 044809-HMO-CTIL

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings