Anti-Hypertensive Agent (ACEi) and Heart Function Improvement in Association With Rho Kinase Activity Changes in Human

February 23, 2010 updated by: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

A Clinical Study on Anti-Hypertensive Agent (ACEi) and Heart Function Improvement

Hypothesis: Rho, one of the small GTPase proteins, and its downstream target molecule, Rho-kinase (ROCK), play important roles in mediating various cellular functions, including contractility, actin cytoskeleton organization, cell adhesion and motility, proliferation, cytokinesis and gene expressions, all of which are involved in the pathogenesis of cardiomyocyte contractility and other vascular disease. The investigators thus hypothesize that ROCK pathway plays an important role in the function and severity of heart failure (HF) and can be one of the possible pathway that currently applied cardiovascular medicine affecting their prognosis among HF treatment.

Previous study has shown that in patients with HF, intra-arterial infusion of fasudil causes preferential increase in forearm blood flow as compared with control subjects, suggesting an involvement of Rho/Rho-kinase pathway in the increased peripheral vascular HF failure remain to be examined. Besides, whether the rho kinase activity was enhanced or their response to current medication in HF patients remained unsolved.

Aim: ROCK activity and left ventricular function between HF or non-HF population survey and their response to ACEi Tx.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Study design: We will enroll subjects from clinics of National Cheng Kung University Hospital.

Subjects will be then divided to two groups by their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ratio: preserved LVEF (EF>40%) and impaired LVEF (EF<40%). All subjects will initially receive 10mg of enalapril and be gradually titrated up to 20mg with blood pressure tolerance for 6 months. Before and after 6 months, echocardiography and blood sample will be assayed for biomarkers and rho kinase activity, respectively.

Outcomes and measurement: The outcomes will include the mean changes in the Rho-kinase activity in leukocytes before and after periods of treatment. Leukocyte Rho-kinase expression and activity will be measured in cells isolated from peripheral blood samples and frozen at -80 °C. The other outcomes are the correlation between the mean changes in Rho-kinase activity in leukocytes and cardiac function measured by 2D and M-mode echocardiography. In addition, we will calculate the association of ROCK activity and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as well as its relation with clinical characteristics. The demographic, relevant clinical data and laboratory results will be all collected from patients and/or medical records.

Primary Outcomes and measurement: The primary outcomes are the mean changes in the Rho-kinase activity in leukocytes before and after periods of treatment. Leukocyte Rho-kinase expression and activity will be measured in cells isolated from peripheral blood samples and frozen at -80 °C. Western Blot assays will be performed to measure Rho-kinase activity .

Secondary Outcomes and measurement: The secondary outcomes are the correlation between the mean changes in Rho-kinase activity in leukocytes and cardiac function measured by echocardiography and tissue Doppler to measure systolic and diastolic function. In addition, the association of Rho kinase activity and BNP, hsCRP as well as its relation with clinical characteristics will be measured.

Besides, we will check the renal and liver function deterioration, changes in serum potassium levels, need for kidney replacement therapy and postural hypotension or dizziness or shock events to monitor the safety issues. Other parameters of adding medication will be recorded, including side effects like cough, angioedema, skin rash, intolerance to the medication.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 70401
        • Recruiting
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ping-Yen Liu, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • those subjects aged from 16 to 80 years
  • diagnosed as systolic hypertension

Exclusion Criteria:

  • renal insufficiency (serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dl)
  • hyperkalemia (serum potassium ≥ 5mmol/L)
  • with systemic inflammatory disease, including history of autoimmune disease, malignance; bilateral renal artery stenosis
  • prior intolerance of an angiotensin receptor blockade (ARB) or ACE
  • ACEi or ARB use within recent 1 month
  • record of symptomatic hypotension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: preserved LVEF under ACEi treatment
Drug: Enalapril
All subjects will initially receive 10mg of enalapril and be gradually titrated up to 20mg with blood pressure tolerance for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Renitec
Experimental: Poor LVEF group
Poor LVEF under ACEi treatment
Drug: Enalapril
All subjects will initially receive 10mg of enalapril and be gradually titrated up to 20mg with blood pressure tolerance for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Renitec

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcomes are the mean changes in the Rho-kinase activity in leukocytes before and after periods of treatment.
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The correlation between the mean changes in Rho-kinase activity in leukocytes and cardiac function measured by echocardiography.
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
3 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jyh-Hong Chen, MD, PhD, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 12, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HR-98-096

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Enalapril

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings