Comparison of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol for Pre-emptive Intravenous Analgesia for Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair

February 23, 2010 updated by: Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Pre-emptive Intravenous Analgesia for Elective Inguinal Hernia Repair: Prospective Randomized Double-blinded Placebo Controlled Comparison of Lornoxicam and Paracetamol

The purpose of this study is to determine whether lornoxicam or paracetamol is more effective in providing pre-emptive analgesia for adult patients undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair under general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Early postoperative pain is the major cause that may restric physical activity of the patients and delay in returning work. Newer non-steroid analgesic drugs (NSAD) can be helpful in overcoming this problem, especially in pre-emptive use. In this prospective randomized placebo controlled double blinded study we aimed to determine whether lornoxicam, as a NSAD, or paracetamol is more effective in providing pre-emptive analgesia for patients undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernai repair under general anesthesia. 60 patients above the age of 18, ASA score of I to III will be assigned into 3 groups. All the patients will be operated under general anesthesia. Recurrent hernia cases, pregnant or lactated women, patients allergic to the two drugs, patients with documented gastric disorders or bleeding disorder or under anticoagulent therapy will be excluded.

Group designs:

Group I: 100 ml intravenous saline infusion as placebo 30 minitues before the surgery.

Group II: 8 mg intravenous lornoxicam infusion in 100 ml saline 30 minitues before the surgery.

Group III: 1 g intravenous paracetamol infusion in 100 ml saline 30 minitues before the surgery.

All patients will receive patient controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine for 24 hours postoperatively.

Postoperative pain levels will be determined by VAS (visual analog scale) and morphine consumption will be recorded.

Patients will be prescribed with oral paracetamol (300 mg) plus codein (15 mg)at discharge at the end first 24 hours.

Patients will be asked to record daily consumption of given analgesic, pain response to physical activity by using Likert scale, and VAS scores daily.

The first follow-up examination will take place on day-7. The patients will be asked to keep recording the same parameters until the second hospital visit at 4th week.

On the follow-up examination at 4th week quality of life will be determined by SF-36 form.

The results will be analyzed using SPSS for Windows software.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • inguinal hernia
  • unilateral hernia
  • general anesthesia
  • elective repair

Exclusion Criteria:

  • drug allergy
  • bilateral hernia
  • local anesthesia
  • local blockade
  • regional anesthesia
  • emergency surgery
  • complicated hernia
  • recurrent hernia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Control
Group I (Placebo Control) 100 ml intravenous saline infusion as placebo 30 minitues before the surgery.
Other: Sterile Saline
Group I: 100 ml intravenous saline infusion as placebo 30 minitues before the surgery.
Other Names:
  • Saline
Active Comparator: Lornoxicam
Group II: 8 mg intravenous lornoxicam infusion in 100 ml saline 30 minitues before the surgery.
Drug: Intravenous lornoxicam
Group II: 8 mg intravenous lornoxicam infusion in 100 ml saline 30 minitues before the surgery.
Other Names:
  • Lornoxicam: Xefo
Active Comparator: Paracetamol
Group III: 1 g intravenous paracetamol infusion in 100 ml saline 30 minitues before the surgery.
Drug: Intravenous paracetamol
Group III: 1 g intravenous paracetamol infusion in 100 ml saline 30 minitues before the surgery.
Other Names:
  • Paracetamol: Perfalgan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative pain and comfort
Time Frame: 24 and 48 hours
24 and 48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Postoperative late pain complaint and quality of life
Time Frame: 4. week
4. week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ercan Sonmez, MD, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 24, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HerniaAnalgesia2010-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings