Midfoot Fusion Bolt (MFB) in the Early Stage of Diabetic-neuropathic Charcot Feet (MFB)

July 21, 2021 updated by: AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

Midfoot Fusion Bolt (MFB). A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment With Midfoot Fusion Bolt in the Early Stage of Diabetic-neuropathic Charcot Feet

Randomized clinical trial (RCT) to compare treatment failure rates of surgical arthrodesis with MFB against cast treatment in patients suffering from early stage Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) of the midfoot (Sella and Barrette stages 0, 1 or 2) within the first 2 years after initial treatment. Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following: 1. Amputation, 2. Occurrence of ulcer or worsening of existing ulcer, 3. Surgical intervention for correction of deformity after initial treatment. The secondary aims are to compare foot function, radiologic outcome, quality of life, complications and foot temperature between the two groups.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Rostock, Germany, 18055
        • Dept. of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rostock

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type I or II
  • CN stages 0, 1 or 2 of the midfoot (Sella and Barrette classification)
  • Willingness and ability to participate in the study follow-up according to the protocol
  • Ability to understand and read local language at elementary level
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Legal incompetence
  • Previous Charcot foot on the affected side
  • Active osteomyelitis in the affected foot
  • Above knee amputation on the contralateral side
  • Patient health status not adequate for surgery
  • Active malignacy
  • Severe peripheral arterial disease (ankle-brachial index <0.7 or absent digital waveforms on Doppler)
  • Ulcer grade 2 or more on the Wagner classification system
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Life-threatening co-morbidities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Midfoot Fusion Bolt
Procedure: Surgery with Midfoot Fusion Bolt
Surgery with Midfoot Fusion Bolt
Experimental: Cast treatment
Procedure: Cast treatment
Cast treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment failure rate
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following:

  1. Amputation
  2. Occurrence of ulcer or worsening of existing ulcer (according to Wagner classification)
  3. Surgical intervention for correction of deformity after initial treatment
baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Foot function
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Foot and ankle ability measure score and standard Range of motion measurements.
baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Radiologic outcome
Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months
Weightbearing or simulate lateral and AP x-Rays of both feet will be taken. Talus-first metatarsal and Calcaneus-fifth metatarsal angle will be measured.
baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months
Evaluation of the generic quality of life including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
EuroQoL5 questionnaire
baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Rate of complications
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Foot temperature
Time Frame: baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Diabetica Solutions thermometer
baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MFB 2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings