The Comparison of 32mm and 28mm Head Components in Alumina-alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
The Comparison of 32mm and 28mm Head Components in Alumina-alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
It has been postulated that use of a larger femoral head could reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, but only limited clinical data have been presented in third generation alumina bearings.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of femoral head size for total hip arthroplasty using third generation alumina bearings on the joint stability and clinical results.
The investigators hypothesized that larger ceramic head group has a similar rate of dislocation and clinical results in smaller ceramic head group.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- osteonecrosis of femoral head
- primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the hips
- femoral neck fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty
- highly dislocated or severe ankylosed hip
- patients who are considered potentially unreliable or who may not reliably attend study visits
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 32mm ceramic head group
patients performed with THA using 32mm ceramic head
|
we performed THA using 32mm ceramic head in this group.
|
|
Active Comparator: 28mm ceramic head group
patients performed with THA using 28mm ceramic head
|
we performed THA using 28mm ceramic head in this group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
6 weeks
|
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 3 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
3 months
|
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 6 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
6 months
|
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 9 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
9 months
|
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 12 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
12 months
|
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 24 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
6 weeks
|
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
3 months
|
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
6 months
|
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 9 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
9 months
|
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
12 months
|
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 24 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kyung-Hoi Koo, Professor, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SNU 08-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT07345299Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Arthroplasty Replacement, Knee
-
NCT06208553Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT06107296RecruitingArthroplasty, Hip Replacement | Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement
-
NCT04896892Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT05452161CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT03481595CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT03499028CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT04803578CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT03008967CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT03849638RecruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Clinical Trials on 32mm ceramic head group
-
NCT00208507Completed
-
NCT00953719CompletedNon-inflammatory Degenerative Joint Disease
-
NCT01522014CompletedTotal Hip Replacement
-
NCT04376320CompletedAlveolar Ridge Enlargement
-
NCT07079878Completed
-
NCT06929000RecruitingObese Patients | Adjustable Headrests | Ventilation Function
-
NCT07587970Recruiting
-
NCT02735538CompletedOsteonecrosis of Femoral Head
-
NCT06805604Active, not recruitingMonolithic Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by Different Digital Techniques
-
NCT03491319CompletedHead-Down Tilt Following Spinal Anesthesia