- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01098604
The Comparison of 32mm and 28mm Head Components in Alumina-alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
The Comparison of 32mm and 28mm Head Components in Alumina-alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
It has been postulated that use of a larger femoral head could reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty, but only limited clinical data have been presented in third generation alumina bearings.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of femoral head size for total hip arthroplasty using third generation alumina bearings on the joint stability and clinical results.
The investigators hypothesized that larger ceramic head group has a similar rate of dislocation and clinical results in smaller ceramic head group.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeonggi-do
-
Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- osteonecrosis of femoral head
- primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the hips
- femoral neck fracture
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous hemi- or total hip arthroplasty
- highly dislocated or severe ankylosed hip
- patients who are considered potentially unreliable or who may not reliably attend study visits
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 32mm ceramic head group
patients performed with THA using 32mm ceramic head
|
we performed THA using 32mm ceramic head in this group.
|
Active Comparator: 28mm ceramic head group
patients performed with THA using 28mm ceramic head
|
we performed THA using 28mm ceramic head in this group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
6 weeks
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 3 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
3 months
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 6 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
6 months
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 9 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
9 months
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 12 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
12 months
|
rate of dislocation in each head size
Time Frame: 24 months
|
to evaluate the null hypothesis that the dislocation rate of larger ceramic head group is similar to smaller ceramic head group.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
6 weeks
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
3 months
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 6 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
6 months
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 9 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
9 months
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 12 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
12 months
|
clinical results using Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 24 months
|
to compare the clinical results such as pain, function, range of motion between both groups.
|
24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kyung-Hoi Koo, Professor, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SNU 08-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipItaly
-
Bornholms RegionskommuneCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipDenmark
-
Campus Bio-Medico UniversityRecruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipItaly
-
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCWithdrawnArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreActive, not recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCanada
-
The Royal Bournemouth HospitalCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Hip Replacement, TotalUnited Kingdom
-
University of British ColumbiaThe Arthritis Society, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART; Centre for Advancing Health...Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCanada
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingArthroplasty, Hip Replacement | Arthroplasty, Knee ReplacementFrance
-
Henry Ford Health SystemConsumer Sleep SolutionsNot yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on 32mm ceramic head group
-
DePuy OrthopaedicsCompleted
-
DePuy OrthopaedicsCompletedNon-inflammatory Degenerative Joint DiseaseUnited States
-
University of AlbertaStryker Canada LPCompletedTotal Hip ReplacementCanada
-
Lydia NabilCompletedAlveolar Ridge EnlargementEgypt
-
Zimmer BiometActive, not recruitingPain | Arthritis | OsteoarthrosisSweden, Finland, Denmark
-
Shengjing HospitalCompletedOsteonecrosis of Femoral Head
-
Nitte UniversityCompletedHead-Down Tilt Following Spinal Anesthesia
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedSurgery | Rotator Cuff TearsTurkey
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityCompletedApnea of Prematurity
-
Bartın UnıversityRecruiting