A Randomised Trial Comparing Anterior Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip Replacement
A Single Centre Prospective Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Either Through a Posterior Approach or a Direct Anterior Approach
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Epsom, United Kingdom, KT18 7EG
- The Elective Orthopaedic Centre (EOC)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and females aged 18-75 years at time of surgery.
- Those presenting with primary or secondary osteoarthritis and/or rheumatoid arthritis of the hip.
- Those deemed capable of giving informed consent, understanding the aims of the study and expressing willingness to comply with the post-operative review programme.
- Patients who signed the study consent form prior to surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women or women who plan to conceive in the future.
- Those whose prospects for a recovery to independent mobility would be compromised by known coexistent, medical problems.
- Those already treated by with a Total Hip Replacement (THR) (i.e. requiring a revision hip replacement).
- Those with co-existent ipsilateral knee disease or back problems
- Muscle contracture around the hip joint
- Individuals who have undergone organ transplant.
- Those with a known co-existent medical condition where death is anticipated within five years due to the pre-existing medical condition.
- Individuals who have had a THR on the contra-lateral side within the 6 months.
- Individuals who have undergone a THR on the contralateral side and whose outcome is considered unsatisfactory or not good. An unsatisfactory or poor result is defined as achieving a total UCLA score (including activity) < 16 points.
- Individuals requiring bilateral hip replacement.
- Individuals whose body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) >35.
- Individuals with active or suspected infection or sepsis.
- Individuals with renal failure and/or renal insufficiency.
- Patients with severe forms of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH): Crowe types II, III, IV.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Anterior Approach Group
(AMIS)
|
Anterior minimally invasive surgery (AMIS)
|
|
Active Comparator: Posterior Approach Group
(Posterior)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Compare gait kinematics and the return to normalization of gait in patients that have undergone a THA via the direct anterior approach vs. the posterior approach
Time Frame: on average up to 6 weeks
|
on average up to 6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical assessment of patient using the Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: pre-op and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery
|
pre-op and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery
|
|
|
Assessment of the improvement in quality of life and joint movement using the EuroQol-5D Score
Time Frame: pre-op, 1 year post-op
|
pre-op, 1 year post-op
|
|
|
Assessment of patient's level of activity using the UCLA score
Time Frame: pre-op and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery
|
pre-op and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery
|
|
|
Radiological evaluation to assess the fixation and stability of femoral and acetabular components
Time Frame: pre-op and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery
|
pre-op and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery
|
|
|
Strength Testing
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months and 1y after surgery
|
Muscle strength will be assessed using the MIE digital myometer (from patient #50 to patient #100)
|
6 weeks, 6 months and 1y after surgery
|
|
MRI evaluation
Time Frame: preop-1y after surgery
|
A MRI examination will be used to detect any damage in the hip musculature and tendons (from patient #50 to patient #100)
|
preop-1y after surgery
|
|
Assessment of gait kinematics
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months
|
Comparison gait analysis Anterior vs Posterior groups at fixed time point (from patient #50 to patient # 100)
|
6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Richard E Field, PhD FRCS(Orth), British Orthopaedic Association
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P01.004.12 rev.01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.