Prospective Evaluation of NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) PEG "Rescue" (PEGRescue)

December 12, 2014 updated by: Jeffrey Marks, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Prospective Evaluation of NOTES PEG "Rescue"

The purpose of this study is to determine:

  1. Utility of urgent upper endoscopy in setting of dislodges (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) PEG tube.
  2. Feasibility of replacing naive PEG tubes with Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in lieu of traditional surgical methods.
  3. Efficacy of replacing naive PEG tubes with NOTES in lieu of traditional surgical methods.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Utility of Urgent Upper Endoscopy in Setting of Naïve Dislodged PEG Tubes as defined by:

    • Percentage of Open vs. Closed Gastrotomy upon urgent endoscopy
    • Presence of Incidental Pathology noted on Endoscopy
    • Complications of Urgent Endoscopy
    • Time of Procedure

  2. Technical Feasibility of the NOTES procedure determined by:

    • Number of Successful/Failed PEG Placements
    • Number of Patients Requiring intra-operative conversion to laparotomy or laparoscopic procedure
    • Time to Complete Procedure
    • Presence or absence of post-procedural contrast extravasation on completion contrast radiographic study

  3. Efficacy of NOTES PEG Rescue compared to historical controls as characterized by the following post-operative criteria:

    • Number of Patients Requiring Subsequent Medical or Surgical Treatment for Intra-Abdominal Abscess
    • Number of Patients Requiring Subsequent Medical or Surgical Wound Infection within 30 post-op days
    • Post-Operative CT or Operative Findings consistent with abscess confirmed by culture positive drainage, aspiration
    • Intra-Operative or Post-Operative Red Blood Cell Transfusion
    • Length of Stay
    • Antibiotics > 24h Post-Op
    • 30 day Re-Admission
    • Mortality

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients must meet ALL of the following criteria

  • For prospective candidates, an initial attempt to pass a balloon tipped foley catheter through the external cutaneous tract into the stomach will be performed. It will then be followed by radiographic contrast study to evaluate for extravasation of contrast into the peritoneal cavity. If contrast is extravasated, this will be potential candidate for inclusion. If the foley catheter is unable to be passed through the cutaneous tract, that will also be considered someone for inclusion as this patient will still require an operative confirmation of the patency of the gastrotomy.
  • For retrospective candidates, intra-operative confirmation of dislodged tube as reported in the medical record.
  • The patient must demonstrate pre-operative hemodynamic and respiratory stability
  • No overwhelming medical co-morbidities prohibitive of surgery
  • Subject is 18 years of age or older
  • Subject or subject's legal decision-making proxy agrees to participate, fully understands and signs the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria: Patients must not meet ANY of the following criteria:

  • Esophageal stricture prohibiting passage of an endoscope
  • Any contraindication to surgery
  • Pregnancy or actively breastfeeding women
  • Evidence of active bowel obstruction
  • Synchronous acute abdominal pathology warranting incision-based surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: NOTES PEG Rescue
A new way of performing surgery is called Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery, or NOTES, for short. NOTES may allow surgeons to perform abdominal surgery without any skin incisions. By using natural openings in the body, like the mouth, surgeons can enter the stomach with a tube instead of the traditional method of making an incision in the skin of the abdomen.
Procedure: Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) procedures involve transmural passage of flexible endoscopes introduced via a natural orifice whereby permitting access to the peritoneal cavity while avoiding skin incisions. No clear indication due to a number of physiologic, microbiologic, immunologic, and technical limitations. The concept of NOTES PEG "Rescue" in the setting of a dislodged naïve PEG tube may spare individual patients the physiologic stress of traditional surgery while concomitantly providing a natural segue to further study the NOTES platform in the human setting. PEG "Rescue" may represent a unique, practical, and empowering application of the burgeoning experience of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.
Other Names:
  • NOTES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Successful Replacements of Dislodged PEG Tubes With NOTES Procedures in Lieu of Traditional Surgical Methods.
Time Frame: 30 day follow-up
Successful replacement will be determined via the number of patients requiring conversion from NOTES PEG rescue to conventional incision-based surgery.
30 day follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Marks, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 6, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09-07-23

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malnutrition

Clinical Trials on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings