Evaluation of Integrating Self Blood Pressure Monitoring Into Urban Primary Care Practices (ESBPM)
Evaluation of Integrating Self Blood Pressure Monitoring Into Urban Primary Care Practices to Improve Ethnic/ Racial Disparities in Hypertension
Background:
Hypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death in the United States and New York City (NYC). One in 4 NYC adults has hypertension, with higher prevalence in both Blacks and Latinos compared to Whites (Angell 2008). In NYC, only 65% of all adults with HTN and on treatment are controlled (Angell 2008).
Self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM) is associated with reduced blood pressure in patients with hypertension (Cappuccio 2004). Studies suggest that SBPM may increase control either by inducing clinicians to titrate medication more actively, (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2002) by engaging patients to participate in their own health care, (Taylor 2007) or a combination of the two.
However, minimal research has been done to evaluate the effectiveness of SBPM in different racial and/or ethnic groups or in low income populations or to discern effective patterns of SBPM use by patients. Best practices for integration of self monitoring into HTN into regular treatment have also yet to be established.
Objectives:
The goal of this study is to assess the impact of SBPM under conditions consistent with existing community health clinic resources and infrastructure in NYC's medically underserved neighborhoods using commonly available automated home BP monitors. By using a community clinic's electronic health record (EHR) and automated BP monitors with the capability to transmit readings to a research database, we can facilitate a more rigorous evaluation of a pilot SBPM intervention and assess patterns of home monitor use and clinical management and their association with outcomes.
The three specific aims of this intervention are to:
- Assess whether use of SBPM reduces elevated BP and increases HTN control to similar levels in two historically understudied minority populations, Blacks and Latinos.
- Confirm pilot findings by assessing the impact of SBPM on BP and HTN control compared to usual care using randomized controlled trial methodology.
- Develop standards and refine guidance for the effective use of SBPM that can be easily communicated to key stakeholders.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10463
- Riverdale Family Practice
-
Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11220
- Lutheran Family Health Centers
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
-
New York, New York, United States, 10031
- Heritage Health Care
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients attending one of the participating primary care clinics
- Diagnosis of hypertension for at least 6 months
- Ethnicity or Race of Latino, Black or White
- Physically and mentally able to monitor BP at home
- *Uncontrolled BP at last office visit
- *Uncontrolled BP at current office visit
Note: *Uncontrolled BP is defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90, or systolic BP ≥ 130 and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mm Hg for participants with chronic kidney disease or diabetes.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Arm circumference greater than 17.5 inches (maximum size of large BP cuff)
- Already monitoring BP at home at request of health care provider
- No access to a land line telephone line (to upload home readings)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
|
Participants receive home monitors, modems, educational materials and training.
Participants will send home BP readings to research database monthly and receive usual care by providers for 9 months.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Participants receive usual care by providers.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Absolute and relative changes in systolic and diastolic BP in the intervention and control groups.
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
|
Proportion of intervention participants achieving BP control compared to control participants
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
|
Trajectory of BP changes over time.
Time Frame: 9 months
|
9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cappuccio FP, Kerry SM, Forbes L, Donald A. Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38121.684410.AE. Epub 2004 Jun 11. Erratum In: BMJ. 2004 Aug 28;329(7464):499.
- Angell SY, Garg RK, Gwynn RC, Bash L, Thorpe LE, Frieden TR. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and predictors of control of hypertension in New York City. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008 Sep;1(1):46-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.791954.
- Taylor JR, Campbell KM. Home monitoring of glucose and blood pressure. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Jul 15;76(2):255-60.
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Utility of Blood Pressure Monitoring Outside the Clinic Setting: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
- Yi SS, Tabaei BP, Angell SY, Rapin A, Buck MD, Pagano WG, Maselli FJ, Simmons A, Chamany S. Self-blood pressure monitoring in an urban, ethnically diverse population: a randomized clinical trial utilizing the electronic health record. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):138-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000950. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PCIP-CVD-ESBPM2010
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.