Innate Immune Functions of Immature Neutrophils

July 1, 2010 updated by: University Hospital, Geneva
Polymorphonuclear neutrophils, or granulocytes, are essential effector cells of the innate immune system against bacterial infections. Their role in sepsis has been long established as the primary phagocyte to clear the infectious process. In the early phase of sepsis, one observes a massive recruitment of immature neutrophils from the bone marrow into peripheral blood, the so-called "band forms" or "left shift cells". Despite the daily clinical use of neutrophil band forms count in the care of septic patients and their abundance in septic blood, no information exists on the fate of these cells, nor on their capacity to mount an efficient innate immune response. It is the goal of this proposal to study the fate and the innate immune functions of immature neutrophils obtained in patients with early septic shock. Immature neutrophils will be separated from mature neutrophils. The following functions will be studied ex vivo in mature vs. immature neutrophils from a series of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: (1) surface expression of receptors of the innate immunity; (2) production of inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen species in response to bacterial agonists; (3) chemotaxis; (4) phagocytosis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria; and (5) ex vivo viability (life span) and resistance to apoptosis. Importantly, the investigators have developed and mastered all in vitro assays and cell separation techniques necessary to address and answer these important questions. This project will undoubtedly shed light on the fate and function of a prominent leukocyte population circulating in patients with severe bacterial infections and sepsis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Objectives

  1. Primary objective: To determine the innate immune functions of immature neutrophils in comparison to those from mature neutrophils, sampled from patients with severe sepsis and sepsis shock and in control patients (trauma patients and healthy donors (only mature neutrophils in the latter case)
  2. Secondary objectives: To determine the fate and span life of immature neutrophils in comparison to mature neutrophils, sampled from patients with severe sepsis and sepsis shock and in control patients (trauma patients and healthy donors (only mature neutrophils in the latter case).

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (according to ACCP/FCCM standard definitions) with > 5% immature neutrophils.
  • Patients with a noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), e.g. patients with head trauma or multiple trauma with > 5% immature neutrophils.
  • Healthy donors

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe immunosuppression (e.g. HIV with < 200 CD4/mm3), treatment with glucocorticoids (> 300 mg hydrocortisone/day) or other immunosuppressive therapy
  • Neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5 G/l).
  • Recent chemotherapy or administration of intravenous immunoglobulins within the last 4 weeks.

Endpoints

  • Surface expression of receptors of the innate immunity in immature vs. mature neutrophils.
  • Production by immature vs. mature neutrophils of inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen species in response to bacterial agonists.
  • Chemotaxis of immature vs. mature neutrophils.
  • Phagocytosis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by immature vs. mature neutrophils.
  • Ex vivo viability and resistance to apoptosis of immature vs. mature neutrophils.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1211
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospitals of Geneva, Intensive Care
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Geneviève Drifte, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
  • Patients with a noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
  • Healthy donors

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (according to ACCP/FCCM standard definitions) with > 5% immature neutrophils.
  • Patients with a noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), e.g. patients with head trauma or multiple trauma with > 5% immature neutrophils.
  • Healthy donors

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe immunosuppression (e.g. HIV with < 200 CD4/mm3), treatment with glucocorticoids (> 300 mg hydrocortisone/day) or other immunosuppressive therapy
  • Neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5 G/l).
  • Recent chemotherapy or administration of intravenous immunoglobulins within the last 4 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Sepsis patients
Patients presenting sepsis
SIRS patients
Patients presenting with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Healthy subjects
Healthy blood donors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Innate immune functions of neutrophils
Time Frame: 12 months
  • Surface expression of receptors of the innate immunity in immature vs. mature neutrophils.
  • Production by immature vs. mature neutrophils of inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen species in response to bacterial agonists.
  • Chemotaxis of immature vs. mature neutrophils.
  • Phagocytosis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by immature vs. mature neutrophils.
  • Ex vivo viability and resistance to apoptosis of immature vs. mature neutrophils.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Geneva

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 2, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CER 09-311

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings