A Study of Erlotinib [Tarceva] as Monotherapy or Intermittent Dosing With Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. (TALISMAN)

October 15, 2015 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib or Intermittent Dosing of Erlotinib and Docetaxel in Male Former-smokers With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC in Second-line Setting After Failure on Chemotherapy

This randomized parallel group study will assess the efficacy and safety of erlotinib [Tarceva], as monotherapy or intermittent dosing with docetaxel, in second-line setting in former-smoker male patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive either Tarceva (150 mg/day orally) as monotherapy or 4 cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks) plus Tarceva (150 mg/day orally, days 2-16 each cycle) followed by Tarceva monotherapy. Anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
74

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Campania
      • Avellino, Campania, Italy, 83100
      • Napoli, Campania, Italy, 80131
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 43100
    • Friuli-Venezia Giulia
      • Aviano (PN), Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy, 33081
    • Lazio
      • Roma, Lazio, Italy, 00168
      • Roma, Lazio, Italy, 00152
      • Roma, Lazio, Italy, 00157
    • Lombardia
      • Cremona, Lombardia, Italy, 26100
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20142
      • Monza, Lombardia, Italy, 20900
      • Pavia, Lombardia, Italy, 27100
      • Sondalo, Lombardia, Italy, 23039
    • Marche
      • Macerata, Marche, Italy, 62100
    • Puglia
      • Lecce, Puglia, Italy, 73100
      • San Giovanni Rotondo, Puglia, Italy, 71013
    • Toscana
      • Lido Di Camaiore, Toscana, Italy, 55043
      • Pisa, Toscana, Italy, 56124
      • Pontedera, Toscana, Italy, 56025
    • Veneto
      • Treviso, Veneto, Italy, 31100
      • Vicenza, Veneto, Italy, 36100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male patients, >/=18 years of age
  • former smoker (smoked >/= 100 cigarettes in his lifetime and quit >12 months before enrollment)
  • locally advanced (stage IIIb), metastatic (stage IV) or recurrent squamous non-small cell lung cancer
  • prior platinum-based therapy for advanced NSCLC
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • prior therapy against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
  • >1 prior chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC
  • radiotherapy <28 days prior to enrollment
  • history of melanoma at any time, or another malignancy in the last 5 years except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or surgically cured malignant neoplasias with a disease-free interval of >5 years
  • not fully treated eye inflammation or infection, or predisposing conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: A
Drug: erlotinib [Tarceva]
150 mg/day orally, days 2-16 each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles; 150 mg/day orally thereafter
Drug: erlotinib [Tarceva]
150 mg/day orally as monotherapy
Experimental: B
Drug: erlotinib [Tarceva]
150 mg/day orally, days 2-16 each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles; 150 mg/day orally thereafter
Drug: erlotinib [Tarceva]
150 mg/day orally as monotherapy
Drug: docetaxel
75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Free From Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months
Time Frame: Month 6
According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, progressive Disease (PD) is defined as: for Target Lesions - At least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). For Non-Target Lesions - Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the interval (in days) between the date of randomization and the first documentation of progressive disease or death from any cause. Participants alive and progression-free were considered as censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessment, but known to be alive, were censored at the time of randomization. PFS (days) = (Date of Event - Date of Randomization) + 1. PFS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Detailed definition of PD is provided in Outcome Measure 1.
From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization until death, assessed up to 18 months
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval (in days) between the date of randomization and death from any cause. Participants alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. OS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
From randomization until death, assessed up to 18 months
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Time Frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Best overall response (complete response [CR]/partial response [PR]) was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (PD). Best response in this trial was defined as the best response observed at any post-treatment visits. According to RECIST Version 1.1, CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than [<] 10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to [>=] 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Time Frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Disease control was defined as PR, CR, or SD. Participants who did not achieve a CR or PR or SD were counted as non-responders in the analysis of disease control. According to RECIST Version 1.1, SD was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR, and PD. Detailed definitions of CR and PR are provided in Outcome Measure 4.
From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Duration of Response (DoR)
Time Frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months
Duration of response (DoR) was defined as the interval (in days) from first documentation of a response (CR/PR depending on which occurred first) to the date of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. Participants presenting a response were considered as censored at the date of the last assessment with a documentation of non-progression. DoR (days) = (Date of PD/death - Date of CR/PR) + 1. Assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. DoR was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Detailed definitions of CR and PR are provided in Outcome Measure 4.
From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 16, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ML21869

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on erlotinib [Tarceva]

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings