Comparative Study of Reconstituted JUVÉDERM® Ultra vs COSMODERM® 1 for Lip and Cheek Lines, Folds or Wrinkles (JUVE_COSMO_1)

September 9, 2011 updated by: Steven Fagien

A Prospective, Open Label, Randomized, Comparative, Split-Face Study Evaluating Reconstituted JUVÉDERM® Ultra Injectable Gel Versus COSMODERM® 1 Human Based Collagen Implant for the Treatment of Vertical Lip Rhytids and Radial Cheek Lines

This study is being done to evaluate the differences in the performance of two well known injectable dermal fillers commonly used for the cosmetic treatment of age lines above the lips and on the cheeks when compared to each other in the same patient. The products being tested are Juvéderm® Ultra and CosmoDerm® 1.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single center, prospective, open label, randomized, comparative, split-face study in adult females or males aged 25 to 70 years seeking treatment with reconstituted Juvéderm® Ultra and CosmoDerm® 1 human-based collagen implant for moderate to severe vertical lip rhytids and/or radial cheek lines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33431
        • Steven Fagien, MD, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult females or males, aged 25 to 70 years;
  • Subjects must be seeking treatment with Juvéderm Ultra and CosmoDerm 1 injections for vertical lip rhytids or radial cheek lines;
  • Subjects must have one or more moderate to severe vertical lip rhytids and/or moderate to severe radial cheek lines based on the physician evaluator assessment (0-3 scale);
  • Women must either be of non-childbearing potential (i.e., surgically sterilized or post-menopausal) or if of childbearing potential, must not be pregnant (as documented by a negative urine pregnancy test at the baseline examination) or lactating and must be practicing a medically acceptable method of birth control;
  • Subjects must be willing and able to provide written informed consent;
  • Subjects must be willing and able to follow the procedures outlined in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) or who have an infant they are breast-feeding or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control;
  • Previous Botox treatment to the lower two-thirds of the face within the past 6 months for subjects who will have injections into their radial cheek lines. Note: this exclusion criterion does not apply to subjects who only will have injections into lip rhytids unless the previous Botox treatment was administered within the past 6 months to the upper lip region;
  • Previous semipermanent injectable filler therapy to the mid-lower face within the past year or any prior history of permanent filler therapy injection to the mid-lower face;
  • Prior cosmetic procedures (i.e., facelift, etc.) or visible scars that may affect evaluation of response and/or quality of photography in the opinion of the investigator;
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the treatment injections or their components, including known or suspected lidocaine hypersensitivity;
  • Known severe allergies manifested by a history of anaphylaxis or history or presence of multiple severe allergies;
  • Subjects with an infection at an injection site or systemic infection (in this case, postpone study entry until one week following recovery);
  • Subjects requiring treatment with major anticoagulants (such as Coumadin) or antiplatelets (such as Plavix) during the study; low-dose aspirin treatment or antiinflammatory medication with potential anticoagulant or antiplatelet effect may be allowed at the investigator's discretion;
  • Concurrent participation in an investigational drug or device study or participation within 30 days of study start;
  • Subjects are not to undergo any additional cosmetic procedures during the study period;
  • Subjects are not to change use of any facial products up to 6 months prior to enrollment and during study period;
  • Subjects with a history of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment, or unreliability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Juvéderm Ultra
Juvéderm Ultra injection
Device: Juvéderm Ultra
Split-face injection of Juvéderm Ultra into vertical lip rhytids and radial cheek lines on one side of face
Other Names:
  • Juvéderm Ultra injectable gel (crosslinked hyaluronic acid)
Active Comparator: Cosmoderm 1
Cosmoderm 1 injection
Device: Cosmoderm 1
Split-face injection of Cosmoderm 1 into vertical lip rhytids and radial cheek lines on one side of face
Other Names:
  • Cosmoderm 1 human-based collagen implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Assessment of Improvement by Physician Evaluator
Time Frame: 3 days, 2 and 6 weeks, 4 and 6 months
Global Assessment of Improvement by Physician Evaluator, including Facial Photographs, Vertical Lip Rhytids and Radial Cheek Line Rating Scales
3 days, 2 and 6 weeks, 4 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Efficacy, Pain, Adverse Event Assessments
Time Frame: 3 days, 2 and 6 weeks, 4 and 6 months
  • Facial Line Outcomes (FLO-11 version 1.0) Questionnaire - Patient
  • Self-Perception of Age (SPA version 2.0) measure - Patient
  • Global Assessment of Improvement - Patient
  • Self-Rated Pain Assessment Scale (0-10 point rating scale)
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events
3 days, 2 and 6 weeks, 4 and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Steven Fagien

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Fagien, MD, Steven Fagien, MD, PA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JUVE_COSMO_1-10-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intrinsic Aging of Skin

Clinical Trials on Juvéderm Ultra

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings