Study of BMS-754807 Combined With Letrozole or BMS-754807 Alone in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and Resistance to Non-Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors

August 7, 2020 updated by: Bristol-Myers Squibb

A Phase 2 Study of BMS-754807 Combined With Letrozole or BMS-754807 Alone in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Subjects With Acquired Resistance to Non-Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors

The purpose of this study is to evaluate oral doses of BMS-754807 in combination with letrozole or BMS-754807 alone are safe and efficacious in locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer subjects who have progressed with prior non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
77

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Univ Of Al At Birmingham
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Sharp Clinical Oncology Research
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago Medical Center
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
        • Illinois Cancercare, Pc
    • Indiana
      • Goshen, Indiana, United States, 46526
        • Indiana University Health Goshen Center for Cancer Care
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231-1000
        • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
      • Wheaton, Maryland, United States, 20902
        • Oncology Care Associates, P.A.
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Masonic Cancer Ctr, University Of Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • Unv. Of Nc At Chapel Hill
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7305
        • Unv. Of Nc At Chapel Hill
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Presbyterian Hospital Cancer Research
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center-Dept Of Medicine
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009
        • Ut Md Anderson Can Ctr.
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Ut Md Anderson Can Ctr.
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Health System
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792-6164
        • University of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive and HER-2 negative breast cancer
  • Disease progression following non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known symptomatic brain metastasis
  • Medical condition requiring chronic steroids
  • History of Type 1 or 2 Diabetes
  • Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular (CV) disease
  • Concomitant second malignancies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: BMS-754807
Drug: BMS-754807
Tablet, Oral, 100 mg, Daily, Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
EXPERIMENTAL: BMS-754807 + letrozole
Drug: BMS-754807
Tablet, Oral, 100 mg, Daily, Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Drug: letrozole
Tablets, Oral, 2.5 mg, Daily, Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Other Names:
  • Femara®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival Rate at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 24 weeks after initiation of study treatment
Progression free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks after treatment with BMS 754807/letrozole was to be calculated as the total number of subjects neither progressed nor died after 24 weeks of treatment divided by the total number of subjects (with measurable or non-measurable disease) randomized/assigned to combination treatment arm and treated. In participants with measurable disease Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) criteria was to be used to assess disease progression.This outcome was not measured due to early termination of the study.
24 weeks after initiation of study treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Participants With Measurable Disease
Time Frame: 24 weeks after initiation of study treatment

ORR is defined as the number of participants with best overall response (OR) of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by the number of participants who received treatment.

Participants were to be evaluated for tumor response per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions.: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. This outcome measure was not met due to early termination of the study
24 weeks after initiation of study treatment
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs, Non-serious AEs , Discontinuation Due to AEs and Deaths
Time Frame: Non-SAEs: Day 1 to 7 days after the participant discontinues study medication or 7 days after the End of Treatment visit (up to 42 months), For SAEs: during the screening period and within 30 days of discontinuation of dosing ,up to 42 months
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered an investigational (medicinal) product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Non-SAEs: Day 1 to 7 days after the participant discontinues study medication or 7 days after the End of Treatment visit (up to 42 months), For SAEs: during the screening period and within 30 days of discontinuation of dosing ,up to 42 months
Duration of Response (DOR) in Participants With Measurable Disease
Time Frame: 24 weeks after initiation of study treatment
DOR was to be performed to further characterize the response rate at Week 24. Duration of response is defined as the time between the Week 25 date of response and the date of objectively documented disease progression as defined by modified RECIST 1.1 criteria or death, whichever occurs first. DOR could not be assessed due to early termination of the study.
24 weeks after initiation of study treatment
Number of On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Grade 1-2
Time Frame: Assessed from day 1 up to within 30 days of last dose (Approximately 42 months)
Blood and urine samples were obtained at specified times points for laboratory evaluations. Clinical Laboratory Sage Panels included: Hematology: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Red blood cell, Total leukocyte count, including differential, Platelet count. Serum Chemistry : Albumin, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALK-P), Bilirubin, total (TB). Reflex testing of direct (conjugated) and indirect (unconjugated) bilirubin will be ordered if total bilirubin > 5X ULN, Blood urea nitrogen (BUN or urea), Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Creatinine, serum, Glucose, fasting plasma, Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Protein, total, Sodium, Triglycerides, Uric acid Urinalysis, Blood, Glucose, Ketones, Leukocyte esterase, pH, Protein. Laboratory tests were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 criteria
Assessed from day 1 up to within 30 days of last dose (Approximately 42 months)
Number of On-study Laboratory Abnormalities: Grade 3-4
Time Frame: Assessed from day 1 up to within 30 days of last dose (Approximately 42 months)
Blood and urine samples were obtained at specified times points for laboratory evaluations. Clinical Laboratory Sage Panels included: Hematology: Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, Red blood cell, Total leukocyte count, including differential, Platelet count. Serum Chemistry : Albumin, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALK-P), Bilirubin, total (TB). Reflex testing of direct (conjugated) and indirect (unconjugated) bilirubin will be ordered if total bilirubin > 5X ULN, Blood urea nitrogen (BUN or urea), Calcium, Chloride, Cholesterol, Creatinine, serum, Glucose, fasting plasma, Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Protein, total, Sodium, Triglycerides, Uric acid Urinalysis, Blood, Glucose, Ketones, Leukocyte esterase, pH, Protein Laboratory tests were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 criteria
Assessed from day 1 up to within 30 days of last dose (Approximately 42 months)
Treatment Failure Rate (TFR)
Time Frame: 24 weeks after initiation of study treatment
The TFR was to be calculated as the total number of subjects who discontinued the treatment for any reason (including disease progression, treatment toxicity, and death) at 24 weeks divided by the total number of subjects randomized/assigned to the arm and treated. In the monotherapy arm, the TFR was to be assessed while subjects were on monotherapy.
24 weeks after initiation of study treatment
Changes in Absolute Copy Numbers and Relative Expression of Insulin Receptor Isoform A (IR-A) in Tumor Tissue in Response to Treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks after initiation of study
Absolute copy numbers and relative expression of insulin receptor isoforms (IR-A, IR-B) in pre- and posttreatment fresh tumor tissues were to be measured. This outcome was not measured due to early termination of the study.
24 weeks after initiation of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bristol-Myers Squibb

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 31, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CA191-011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings