A Comparison of Infection Rates Between Two Surgical Sites

October 23, 2013 updated by: Jerry Brewer, Mayo Clinic

A Comparative Assessment Between Two Surgical Sites of the Rate of Corneal Toxicity and Ototoxicity With the Use of Povidone-iodine Versus Chlorhexidine-alcohol for Facial Lesions Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Does the use of chlorhexidine scrub prior to cutaneous surgery on the face increase the chances of toxicity to the eyes or ears? In addition, does the us eof chlorhexidine scrub on the face prior to cutaneous surgery decrease the chances of a post-operative wound infection?

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The intent of this proposed prospective observational cohort study is to determine if there is a difference in the incidence of corneal toxicity and/or ototoxicity in study subjects undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) on the face if a povidone-iodine preparation is used pre-operatively as compared to a chlorhexidine-alcohol preparation. It has recently been found that the use of a chlorhexidine-alcohol preparation is superior to the use of a povidone-iodine preparation in preventing post-operative surgical-site infections (SSI) in patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgery. However, the use of chlorhexidine on the face has previously been associated with corneal toxicity and ototoxicity. This study will help to further define previously reported risks of corneal toxicity and ototoxicity associated with the use of a chlorhexidine solution on the face.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients 18 years of age or older undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery for a skin neoplasm(s) on the face at the Dermatology Surgery Center at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and at the University of Toronto in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, will be included. Exclusion criteria will include: those undergoing MMS for a lesion on the eyelid margin, patients with a history of ongoing eye pain, history of a pre-existing corneal ulcer within 12 months prior to surgery, history of a perforated tympanic membrane, and patients with an active infection at the operative site at the time of surgery. If post-operative follow-up is not completed, the study subject will be excluded from the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing an outpatient cutaneous surgical procedure on the face.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who do not consent to participation
  • Those undergoing cutaneous surgery for a lesion on the eyelid margin
  • Patients with a history of ongoing eye pain
  • History of a pre-existing corneal ulcer within 12 months prior to surgery
  • History of a perforated tympanic membrane
  • Patients with an active infection at the surgical site at the time of surgery.
  • If post-operative follow-up is not completed, the study subject will be excluded from the analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ocular and Ear Toxicities
Time Frame: 1 year
Comparing ocular and ear toxicities between two institutions with differences in aseptic technique.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infection rates
Time Frame: 1 year
compare the infections rates between two institutions with different skin prep practices
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jerry Brewer, MD, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10-004643

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infection

Search Similar Trials