LUX-Breast 2; Afatinib in HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor)-Treatment Failures

March 15, 2019 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

LUX-Breast 2; An Open Label, Phase II Trial of Afatinib (BIBW 2992) in Patients With Metastatic HER2-overexpressing Breast Cancer Failing HER2-targeted Treatment in the Neoadjuvant and/or Adjuvant Treatment Setting

The general aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of afatinib (BIBW 2992) alone and in combination with weekly paclitaxel or weekly vinorelbine (in patients who progress on afatinib monotherapy within this trial) as treatment in patients with HER2-overexpressing, metastatic breast cancer, who failed HER2-targeted treatment in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
74

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Queen Mary Hospital
      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
  • India
      • Amravati, India, 444606
        • Sujan Surgical Cancer Hospital
      • Maharashtra, India, 422 004
        • Curie Manavata Cancer Centre
      • Maharashtra, India, 400 012
        • Tata Memorial Hospital
      • Nagpur, India, 440010
        • Central India Cancer Research Institute
      • Pune, India, 411001
        • Ruby Hall Clinic
      • Thiruvananthapuram, India, 695 011
        • Regional Cancer Center
  • Poland
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-211
        • University Clinical Center, Gdansk
  • Russian Federation
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420029
        • St.Auton.Heal.Inst."Rep.Clin.Onc.Disp.of MoH of Rep. Tatarstan"
      • Krasnodar, Russian Federation, 350040
        • Clinical Oncology Dispensary No. 1, Dept. Chemotherapy
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 129128
        • N.A. Semashko Central Clinical Hospital, Moscow
      • Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation, 357502
        • SBIH of Stavropol territory "Pyatigorsk Oncol. Dispensary"
      • Samara, Russian Federation, 443 031
        • SBIH "Samara Regional Clinical Oncol. Dispensary", Samara
      • Sochi, Russian Federation, 354057
        • GUZ "Oncological Dispesary #2"
      • Stavropol, Russian Federation, 355 047
        • Stavropol Regional Clin. Oncology Dispensary Dept. Oncology
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150 040
        • Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Oncology Hosp. Dept.Chemotherapy
  • Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 404
        • China Medical University Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40705
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10449
        • Mackay Memorial Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Taipe Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Koo Foundation Sun Yet-Sen Cancer Center
  • United Kingdom
      • Barnstaple, United Kingdom, EX31 4JB
        • North Devon District Hospital
      • Bournemouth, United Kingdom, BH7 7DW
        • Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospital
      • Exeter, United Kingdom, EX2 5DW
        • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, W6 8RF
        • Charing Cross Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Female patients >=18 years with proven diagnosis of HER2-overexpressing, histologically confirmed breast cancer
  2. Stage IV metastatic disease
  3. At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours version 1.1). Skin, bone and brain lesions are considered non-target lesions
  4. Must have failed or progressed on either trastuzumab or lapatinib or trastuzumab and lapatinib treatment in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Prior first line therapy for metastatic breast cancer
  2. Known pre-existing interstitial lung disease
  3. Active brain metastases
  4. History or presence of clinically relevant cardiovascular abnormalities such as uncontrolled hypertension, congestive heart failure NYHA classification of 3, unstable angina or poorly controlled arrhythmia. Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to trial treatment.
  5. Cardiac left ventricular function with resting ejection fraction of less than 50%.
  6. Prior treatment with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)/HER2-targeted small molecules or antibodies other than trastuzumab and lapatinib in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting
  7. Prior treatment with paclitaxel in the past 12 months
  8. Must not have received prior vinorelbine treatment - Further exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Afatinib 40mg once daily (OD)
Patient to receive afatinib monotherapy at a dose of 40 mg/d until progression of their disease
Drug: Afatinib 40mg once daily (OD)
Patient to receive afatinib monotherapy at a dose of 40 mg/d until progression of their disease
Experimental: Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly
Patients to additionally receive paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly on disease progression on afatinib monotherapy
Drug: Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly
Patients to additionally receive paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly on disease progression on afatinib monotherapy
Experimental: Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 weekly
Patients to additionally receive vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m2 weekly on disease progression on afatinib monotherapy
Drug: Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 weekly
Patients to additionally receive vinorelbine at a dose of 25 mg/m2 weekly on disease progression on afatinib monotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours Version (RECIST) 1.1
Time Frame: From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Objective response according to RECIST v1.1. Best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) recorded since first administration of trial medication and until the earliest of disease progression, death or start of next treatment in each part separately. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Objective Response (OR) = CR + PR. Percentage of participants with OR along with exact 95% Confidence Interval by Clopper and Pearson is presented.
From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Overall Response According to RECIST v1.1 (With Confirmation)
Time Frame: From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Best overall response was assessed according to RECIST version 1.1 and was calculated relative to the baseline of each respective part .Percentage of participants with best overall response along with exact 95% Confidence Interval by Clopper and Pearson is presented. Best overall response was defined as the best response recorded at any time from the first administration of drug to the End of Treatment (EOT). As Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; progression, at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression.
From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Best Overall Response According to RECIST v1.1 (Regardless of Confirmation)
Time Frame: From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Best overall response was assessed according to RECIST version 1.1 and was calculated relative to the baseline of each respective part (without clinical disease assessment) .Percentage of participants with best overall response along with exact 95% Confidence Interval by Clopper and Pearson is presented. Best overall response was defined as the best response recorded at any time from the first administration of drug to the End of Treatment (EOT). As Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; progression, at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression.
From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From drug start date in monotherapy to 1st disease progression and drug start date in combination therapy to 2nd disease progression
Progression Free Survival is defined as the time from the drug start date to the date of 1st disease progression or death for monotherapy and 2nd disease progression or death from the drug start date of the combination therapy for combination therapy'. Median is calculated from the Kaplan-Meier curve.
From drug start date in monotherapy to 1st disease progression and drug start date in combination therapy to 2nd disease progression
Duration of Objective Response According to RECIST v1.1
Time Frame: From the first objective response to the time of progression or death, up to 1562 days
Duration of objective response, defined as the time from first objective response to the time of progression or death. (regardless of confirmation). As Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; progression, at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression.
From the first objective response to the time of progression or death, up to 1562 days
Percentage of Patients With Highest Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 Grade of 3 or Higher
Time Frame: From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Percentage of patients with highest common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3.0 Grade of 3 or higher.
From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time Frame: Baseline and End of treatment period, up to 1562 days
Change from baseline to end of treatment in systolic blood pressure (SBP).
Baseline and End of treatment period, up to 1562 days
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Time Frame: Baseline and End of treatment period, up to 1562 days
Change from baseline to end of treatment in diastolic blood pressure (DBP).
Baseline and End of treatment period, up to 1562 days
Number of Patient With Possibly Clinically Significant (PCS) Laboratory Values
Time Frame: From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days
Number of patient with possibly clinically significant (PCS) laboratory values by functional group (haematology, differentials, coagulation, electrolytes, enzymes, and substrates). Acronyms Used: Prothrombin time-International normalized ratio (PT-INR), Alanine aminotransferase/Glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/GPT) Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), Aspartate aminotransferase/Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/GOT) Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)
From the initial dose of study drug until 28 days after end of the treatment period, up to 1562 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 24, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 13, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1200.98
  • 2010-021945-29 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings