Cough Responses to Tussive Agents in Health and Disease
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Coughing is a distressing symptom which has a major impact on quality of life. It has been estimated that cough costs the UK economy £1 billion each year. Currently there are no effective anti-tussive agents to treat subjects with cough. Although drugs such as morphine may have some anti-tussive effect, side effects unacceptable.
Currently our understanding of the mechanisms which lead to coughing in different diseases is poor. Many mechanistic studies rely on testing the sensitivity of the cough reflex by inhalation of capsaicin (chilli-pepper extract) or citric acid. These challenges do not differentiate well between health and disease or between different disease states. Other agents such as prostaglandins and bradykinin are known to stimulate a coughing but responses to these agents have rarely been used as a measure of cough reflex sensitivity and not been compared to standard challenges.
It is clear that patients with common airway diseases such as COPD and asthma cough significantly more than healthy subjects. Moreover subjects presenting with chronic cough have cough rates an order of magnitude higher than most patients with airway disease. These differences are poorly represented by the differences in current cough challenge tests.
The investigators hypothesize that patterns of cough responses to different tussive agent may better differentiate between health and different disease states. These patterns may also suggest the different mechanisms leading to cough in different diseases.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Lancashire
-
Manchester, Lancashire, United Kingdom, M23 9LT
- University Hospital of South Manchester
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
General
- Adult subjects aged 18 years and over
Meet criteria for subject groups as outlined below
(1) Healthy volunteers
- Non-smokers
No history of respiratory disease
(2) Healthy smokers
- Current smokers with smoking history of ≥10 pack years
Spirometry within normal limits i.e. FEV1>80% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio >75% predicted
(3) Asthma
- Physician diagnosis of asthma
- Airways hyperresponsiveness to methacholine; PC20<16mg/ml (within last 2 years)
Non-smokers or ex-smoker with smoking history of ≤10 pack years
(4) COPD
- Physician diagnosis of COPD
- Ex-smokers with smoking history of ≥20 pack years
Spirometry demonstrating airflow obstruction i.e. FEV1/FVC ratio <70%
(5) Chronic Cough
- History of a dry cough for >8 weeks
- Normal CXR
- Non-smokers or ex-smoker with smoking history of ≤10 pack years
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1) Symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection within the last 6 weeks 2) Participation in another clinical trial of an investigational drug within the last 4 weeks 3) Use of medication likely to alter cough reflex sensitivity i.e. ACE inhibitors, codeine phosphate, morphine sulphate, 4) Patients with severe respiratory disease i.e. FEV1 < 1 litre, 5) Significant medical co-morbidities likely to affect ability to participate in the trial or affect cough reflex sensitivity e.g. diabetes, stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis etc.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Asthma
Subjects with asthma more than 18 years old with minimal or no smoking history and evidence of bronchial hyperreactivity
|
Inhalational cough challenge tests with capsaicin, bradykinin, Citric acid and prostaglandin E2
Cough recording with a portable device to capture cough sounds
Questionnaires designed to study cough.
These include Leicester cough questionnaire, cough visual analogue score and cough quality of life questionnaire.
|
|
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Subjects with diagnosis of COPD who must be ex smokers and have evidence of airflow obstruction on breathing tests.
|
Inhalational cough challenge tests with capsaicin, bradykinin, Citric acid and prostaglandin E2
Cough recording with a portable device to capture cough sounds
Questionnaires designed to study cough.
These include Leicester cough questionnaire, cough visual analogue score and cough quality of life questionnaire.
|
|
Healthy Volunteers
Healthy non smoking adults.
|
Inhalational cough challenge tests with capsaicin, bradykinin, Citric acid and prostaglandin E2
Cough recording with a portable device to capture cough sounds
Questionnaires designed to study cough.
These include Leicester cough questionnaire, cough visual analogue score and cough quality of life questionnaire.
|
|
Healthy smokers
Current smokers with normal breath tests (spirometry)
|
Inhalational cough challenge tests with capsaicin, bradykinin, Citric acid and prostaglandin E2
Cough recording with a portable device to capture cough sounds
Questionnaires designed to study cough.
These include Leicester cough questionnaire, cough visual analogue score and cough quality of life questionnaire.
|
|
Chronic cough
Subjects with idiopathic chronic cough.
|
Inhalational cough challenge tests with capsaicin, bradykinin, Citric acid and prostaglandin E2
Cough recording with a portable device to capture cough sounds
Questionnaires designed to study cough.
These include Leicester cough questionnaire, cough visual analogue score and cough quality of life questionnaire.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cough response to tussive agents
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
To measure cough responses to capsaicin, citric acid, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Bradykinin (BK) in healthy volunteers, airway diseases (asthma and COPD) and chronic cough. To compare the ability of individual challenges and patterns of challenge response to discriminate between diagnostic groups. |
45 minutes
|
|
Objective cough recording
Time Frame: 24 Hours
|
To perform ambulatory cough recording over 24 hours to assess if there are any differences
|
24 Hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
C2 to inhaled tussive agents
Time Frame: 45 minutes
|
C2 concentration difference between different diagnostic groups after inhalation of tussive agents
|
45 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ashley A Woodcock, FRCP, MD, University Hospital of South Manchester
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- JAS Protocol 2
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.