Role of the Endogenous Opioid System Underlying Modulation of Experimental Pain

July 11, 2012 updated by: University of Florida

Opioid Modulation of Two Models of Pain Inhibition in Healthy Controls and Patients With Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)

The aim of this proposal is to characterize pain inhibition in healthy controls and Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) patients with two models of endogenous pain modulation (off-set analgesia; conditioned pain modulation), and to investigate the function of the endogenous opioid system in these responses by using pharmacological blockade of the opioid receptor.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dysfunction in endogenous pain inhibitory systems has been proposed as a factor in the development and maintenance clinical pain disorders particularly in Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD). Dysfunction has been observed with a model known as diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC), but other models that engage inhibitory systems (offset analgesia) have not been fully evaluated in chronic pain patients.

DNIC evaluates an individual's capacity to engage endogenous pain inhibition. The paradigm is a spatial inhibition model based on the principle that "pain-inhibits-pain" in which pain in a local area is inhibited by a second pain that can be anywhere else in the body. DNIC is traditionally studied by observing a reduction of pain produced by a focal pain stimulus (contact heat) as a result of a second painful stimulus. Research from our lab and others suggests that pain inhibition is reduced in a number of chronic pain conditions. The investigators preliminary data suggests that pain inhibition during DNIC is modulated in part by endogenous opioids; however, results from other DNIC studies have been mixed. In addition, it is possible that reductions in the ability to engage endogenous inhibitory systems in chronic pain patients are due to a weakening of the endogenous opioid system. While pharmacological studies have been conducted with healthy cohorts, only one study has examined the opioid involvement in chronic pain patients.

Offset analgesia is thought to reflect a form of temporal pain inhibition which is usually defined by three stimulus temperature phases: a baseline phase followed by a manipulation phase in which the temperature is briefly increased and returns to the baseline temperature during an "offset" phase. A reduction in pain ratings is observed approximately 15s after the temperature drop (third phase), which is ~50% lower than ratings at the same time point for "constant" trials that continued 48°C for 40s. No studies have examined offset analgesia in a chronic pain cohort or its sensitivity of opioid blockade.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ages 18-50 years old
  • Controls: pain-free based on Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) exam
  • TMD: chronic musculoskeletal pain (face) based on Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) exam

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to adequately communicate and understand informed consent form;
  • Inability to reliably rate pain intensity;
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (or receiving treatment for hypertension with BP of greater than 140/95);
  • Serious systemic (e.g. Diabetes, thyroid problems, etc.);
  • Serious cardiovascular/pulmonary disease;
  • Neurological problems with significant changes in somatosensory and pain perception at the intended stimulation sites (hand, foot);
  • Serious psychiatric problems requiring treatment (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder);
  • Other chronic pain conditions (e.g., low back pain, fibromyalgia);
  • Any other ongoing acute pain problem (arthritis, injury-related pain); or,
  • Irregular menstrual cycles (>40 days) or menstrual cycle disorders (e.g. PMS, dysmenorrhea).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: TMD patients

Intervention:

  • Drug: Naltrexone
  • Drug: placebo
Drug: Naltrexone
Oral, 50 mg, 1 Time Dose
Other Names:
  • Revia
Drug: Placebo
Oral, 1 Time Dose
Other Names:
  • Placebo/sugar pill
Active Comparator: Healthy controls

Intervention:

  • Drug: Naltrexone
  • Drug: placebo
Drug: Naltrexone
Oral, 50 mg, 1 Time Dose
Other Names:
  • Revia
Drug: Placebo
Oral, 1 Time Dose
Other Names:
  • Placebo/sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-drug efficacy of pain inhibition
Time Frame: 1 hour after study medication (day 1)
A change in the ability to reduce experimental pain sensitivity during two models of pain inhibition will be evaluated before and after medication.
1 hour after study medication (day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Florida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
American Pain Society

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher D King, PhD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 24, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • APS2011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings