Atazanavir/Ritonavir, Once Daily + Raltegravir, Twice Daily, Switch Study in HIV-1-Infected Patients (SPARTAN)

February 2, 2015 updated by: Bristol-Myers Squibb

An Open-Label, Randomized Study Evaluating a Switch From a Regimen of Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Regimen Plus Any Third Agent to Either a Regimen of Atazanavir/Ritonavir Once Daily and Raltegravir Twice Daily or to a Regimen of Atazanavir/Ritonavir Once Daily and Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Once Daily in Virologically Suppressed HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Safety and/or Tolerability Issues on Their Present Treatment Regimen.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether HIV-1-infected patients, who are virologically suppressed on a regimen of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus any third agent but are experiencing safety and/or tolerability issues, will maintain virologic suppression after switching to a regimen of heat-stable ritonavir boosted atazanavir, 300/100 mg, once daily plus raltegravir, 400 mg, twice daily.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Allocation: Randomized nonstratified

Intervention model: Parallel versus comparator

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
132

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Lyons Cedex 04, France, 69317
        • Local Institution
      • Orleans Cedex 2, France, 45067
        • Local Institution
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Local Institution
      • Paris Cedex 14, France, 75679
        • Local Institution
      • Strasbourg Cedex, France, 67091
        • Local Institution
    • Cedex 12
      • Paris, Cedex 12, France, 75551
        • Local Institution
  • Germany
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • Local Institution
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Local Institution
      • Frankfurt Am Main, Germany, 60311
        • Local Institution
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Local Institution
      • Munich, Germany, 80336
        • Local Institution
  • Italy
      • Genova, Italy, 16128
        • Local Institution
      • Genova, Italy, 16132
        • Local Institution
      • Milano, Italy, 20127
        • Local Institution
      • Milano, Italy, 20142
        • Local Institution
      • Roma, Italy, 00149
        • Local Institution
  • Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland, 01-201
        • Local Institution
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-136
        • Local Institution
  • Spain
      • Alicante, Spain, 03010
        • Local Institution
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Local Institution
      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Local Institution
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Local Institution
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Local Institution
      • Madrid, Spain, 28805
        • Local Institution
  • United Kingdom
      • Brighton, United Kingdom, BN2 1ES
        • Local Institution
      • London, United Kingdom, E9 6SR
        • Local Institution
      • London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
        • Local Institution
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2RX
        • Local Institution
    • Greater London
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom, SW10 9EL
        • Local Institution
    • Greater Manchester
      • Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, M8 5RB
        • Local Institution
  • United States
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72207
        • Health For Life Clinic Pllc
    • California
      • Palm Springs, California, United States, 92264
        • Eisenhower Medical Center
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94109
        • Metropolis Medical Pc
    • Florida
      • Daytona Beach, Florida, United States, 32117
        • Consultive Medicine
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32805
        • Orange County Health Dept.
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401
        • Triple O Medical Services, P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01105
        • The Research Institute
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14607
        • Aids Care

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Current treatment regimen of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus any third agent for at least 3 months immediately prior to screening
  • Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) for at least 3 months immediately prior to screening
  • Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <40 c/mL) using the Abbott m2000rt® polymerase chain reaction assay during screening period
  • Treatment-related safety and/or tolerability issues to a regimen consisting of 2 NRTIs plus any third agent

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • History of switch in highly active antiretroviral therapy due to virologic failure
  • History of genotypic resistance to any component of the study regimen (atazanavir, raltegravir, tenofovir/emtricitabine)
  • History of exposure to atazanavir/ritonavir or raltegravir prior to entering the study
  • Experiencing safety and/or tolerability issues to tenofovir/emtricitabine or raltegravir
  • Switch of any component of HIV antiretroviral medication regimen in the last 3 months immediately prior to or during the screening period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Raltegravir
Atazanavir + Ritonavir (heat-stable) + Raltegravir
Drug: Atazanavir
Capsules, Oral, 300mg, Once daily, 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Reyataz
Drug: Ritonavir (heat-stable)
Tablets, Oral, 100 mg, Once daily, 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Norvir
Drug: Raltegravir
Tablets, Oral, 400 mg, Twice daily, 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Isentress
Other: Atazanavir/Ritonavir + Tenofovir/Emtricitabine

Reference

Atazanavir + Ritonavir (heat-stable) + Tenofovir/Emtricitabine
Drug: Atazanavir
Capsules, Oral, 300mg, Once daily, 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Reyataz
Drug: Ritonavir (heat-stable)
Tablets, Oral, 100 mg, Once daily, 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Norvir
Drug: Tenofovir/Emtricitabine
Tablets, Oral, 300/200 mg, Once daily, 48 weeks
Other Names:
  • Truvada

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 24
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Week 24
HIV-1 RNA level was measured with the Abbott m2000rt® polymerase chain reaction assay. Response rates were assessed using an intent-to-treat algorithm, with numerator representing patients meeting the response criteria, and denominator representing all randomized patients. Randomized patients not meeting the criteria for treatment failure (eg, discontinuation of study therapy or virologic rebound at or before Week 24) were considered responders. Virologic rebound was defined as 2 consecutive on-treatment HIV-1 RNA levels ≥40 c/mL or the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL followed by discontinuation. Patients who experienced treatment failure or had missing Week 24 HIV-1 RNA levels were considered failures. RNA=ribonucleic acid; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus.
From Day 1 to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Level <40 c/mL at Week 48
Time Frame: From Day 1 to Week 48
Percentages of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels <40 c/mL were summarized at each scheduled visit. Longitudinal plots were created to display proportion versus visit week through Weeks 24 and 48 with error bars representing 95% confidence intervals.
From Day 1 to Week 48
Number of Participants With Virologic Rebound at Weeks 24 and 48
Time Frame: Day 1 to Weeks 28 and 48
Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates.
Day 1 to Weeks 28 and 48
Number of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 24
Time Frame: Day 1 to Week 24
Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates. pts=patients
Day 1 to Week 24
Number of Participants With Genotypable/Phenotypable Isolates, Emergent Genotypic Substitutions in Patients With Genotypable Isolates, and Phenotypic Resistance in Patients With Phenotypable Isolates at Week 48
Time Frame: Day 1 to Week 48
Viral genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles were assessed for virologic rebound (HIV-1 RNA level ≥40 c/mL). Only patients with HIV-1 RNA levels ≥500 c/mL met the criteria for resistance testing. Genotypic substitutions at baseline were summarized for virologic rebound. The genotypic resistance profile presented patients with genotypable isolates, those with protease inhibitor substitutions from genotypable isolates, those with integrase substitutions from genotypable isolates, and those with selected reverse transcriptase substitutions from genotypable isolates using the most current version of the International AIDS Society-USA list and Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. Newly emergent genotypic substitutions were summarized analogously for virologic rebound without baseline phenotypic resistance to atazanavir, ritonavir, or raltegravir, using all on-treatment isolates. pts=patients
Day 1 to Week 48
Number of Patients With Death as Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs, Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, and Treatment-emergent AEs
Time Frame: Day 1 to Week 48
AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Related=having certain, probable, possible, or unknown relationship to study drug.
Day 1 to Week 48
Mean Changes in Fasting Lipid Levels From Baseline to Week 48
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 48
LD=low-density lipoprotein; HDL=high-density lipoprotein.
From Baseline to Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bristol-Myers Squibb

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Bristol-Mayers Squibb, Bristol-Mayers Squibb

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 7, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 2, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AI424-402
  • 2009-017032-41 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV, Combination Therapy

Clinical Trials on Atazanavir

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings