16 Week Efficacy and 2 Year Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis (MEASURE 1)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study of Secukinumab to Demonstrate the 16 Week Efficacy and to Assess the Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy up to 2 Years in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Genk, Belgium, 3600
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Gent, Belgium, 9000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Burgas, Bulgaria, 8000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4002
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1431
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Sofia, Bulgaria, 1612
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1M3
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Newfoundland and Labrador
-
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5B8
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33076
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Limoges, France, 87001
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Paris, France, 75014
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 12203
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Erlangen, Germany, 91054
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Hamburg, Germany, 22415
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Hamburg, Germany, 22143
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Herne, Germany, 44649
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Jena, Germany, 07740
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Koeln, Germany, 50924
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Magdeburg, Germany, 39110
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Nürnberg, Germany, 90429
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Ratingen, Germany, 40882
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
(vr)
-
Valeggio Sul Mincio, (vr), Italy, 37067
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
BS
-
Brescia, BS, Italy, 25123
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
CT
-
Catania, CT, Italy, 95100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PA
-
Palermo, PA, Italy, 90127
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
SI
-
Siena, SI, Italy, 53100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
TO
-
Torino, TO, Italy, 10126
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Baja California
-
Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico, 21100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44160
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Nuevo León
-
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64020
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Sinaloa
-
Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico, 80000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Lima
-
Jesus Maria, Lima, Peru, 11
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
La Victoria, Lima, Peru, 13
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Pueblo Libre, Lima, Peru, 21
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
San Isidro, Lima, Peru, 27
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Surquillo, Lima, Peru, 34
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620028
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620102
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Moscow, Russian Federation, 115522
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Tula, Russian Federation, 300053
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150003
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 81346
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Taiwan ROC
-
Taichung, Taiwan ROC, Taiwan, 40201
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Balcova / Izmir, Turkey, 35340
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Fatih / Istanbul, Turkey, 34098
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Gaziantep, Turkey, 27310
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 2QQ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE1 4LP
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Wolverhampton, United Kingdom, WV10 0QP
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
England
-
London, England, United Kingdom, E11 1NR
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Idaho
-
Boise, Idaho, United States, 83702
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Iowa
-
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, United States, 52401-2112
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Benbrook, Texas, United States, 76126
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Washington
-
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients at least 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe AS with prior documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984)
- Patients should have been on NSAIDs with an inadequate response
- Patients who are regularly taking NSAIDs as part of their AS therapy are required to be on a stable dose
- Patients who have been on an anti-TNFα agent (not more than one) must have experienced an inadequate response
Exclusion criteria:
- Chest X-ray with evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process
- Patients with total ankylosis of the spine
- Patients previously treated with any biological immunomodulating agents except for those targeting TNFα
- Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Secukinumab 10 mg/kg i.v. / 150 mg s.c.
Three i.v.
infusions: at Baseline and weeks 2 and 4, followed by one s.c.
injection every four weeks until the end of the study.
|
Secukinumab (150 mg)
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Secukinumab 10 mg/kg i.v. / 75 mg s.c.
Three i.v.
infusions: at Baseline and weeks 2 and 4, followed by one s.c.
injection every four weeks until the end of the study.
|
Secukinumab (75 mg)
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Three i.v.
infusions: at Baseline and weeks 2 and 4, followed by one s.c.
injection every four weeks until the end of the study.
|
Placebo
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society / ASAS 20 Response
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain.
ASAS 20 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.
|
16 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS 40 Response
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
ASAS 40 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 40% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain.
ASAS 40 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum hsCRP
Time Frame: Base line and Week 16
|
The change from baseline in hsCRP is expressed as a ratio of post-baseline to baseline values.
With the ratio normalized to 1.0 at baseline, ratios less than 1.0 represent decreased postbaseline values, whereas ratios greater than 1.0 represent increased post-baseline values.
|
Base line and Week 16
|
|
Assessment of Responders for the SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS 5/6 Response
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
ASAS 5/6 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined timeframe at least 20% improvement in score in at least 5 of a conventional set of 6 clinical domains relevent to AS and no worsening in the remaining domain.
In this study, ASAS 5/6 is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab against placebo.
|
16 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index / BASDAI
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
|
BASDAI is a validated assessment tool using 0 through 10 scales (0 indicating "no problem" and 10 indicating " worst problem"), to characterize six clinical domains pertaining to five major symptoms of AS perceived by the patients.
Computed composite scores of 4 or greater indicate suboptimal disease control.
In this study, the BASDAI is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab verus placebo.
To give each symptom equal weighting, the mean (average) of the two scores relating to morning stiffness is taken.
The resulting 0 to 50 score is divided by 5 to give a final 0 - 10 BASDAI score.
Scores of 4 or greater suggest suboptimal control of disease, and patients with scores of 4 or greater are usually good candidates for either a change in their medical therapy or for enrollment in clinical trials evaluating new drug therapies directed at Ankylosing Spondylitis.
|
Baseline and 16 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Component of the Short-form Health Survey / SF-36 PCS
Time Frame: baseline, 16 weeks
|
SF-36 is a 36 item questionnaire which measures Quality of Life across eight domains, which are both phyically and emotionally based.
Two overall summary scores, the Phyical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) can be computed.
In this study, SF-36 PCS is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.The SF-36 is a validated instrument measuring health-related quality of life across multiple disease states.
It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores (1) physical component summary=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health.
There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores.
For subscores and summary scores, 0 =worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score.
Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
|
baseline, 16 weeks
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire / ASQoL
Time Frame: baseline and 16 weeks
|
ASQoL is an 18 item questionnaire that assesses disease-specific quality of life (QoL), consisting of statements that are relevant to the physical and mental conditions for a participant with AS: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each statement is answered by the participant as a 'Yes' (scored as 1) or 'No' (scored as 0).
All item scores are summed to give a total score.
Total score can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL).
In this study, ASQoL is used to assess improvement from baseline of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.
|
baseline and 16 weeks
|
|
Assessment of Responders for ASAS Partial Remission
Time Frame: 16 weeks
|
ASAS partial remission is a composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame a value not above 2 units in each of the 4 ASAS domains on a scale of 10.
In this study ASAS partial remission is used to assess the efficacy of at least one dose of secukinumab versus placebo.ASAS partial remission was defined as a VAS score of less than 2 units in each of the 4 domains of ASAS 20: participant global assessment, pain (total back pain), function and inflammation.
The percentages of participants who achieved ASAS partial remission were calculated.
|
16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- van der Horst-Bruinsma I, Miceli-Richard C, Braun J, Marzo-Ortega H, Pavelka K, Kivitz AJ, Deodhar A, Bao W, Porter B, Pournara E. A Pooled Analysis Reporting the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Male and Female Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1775-1787. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00380-2. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
- Schett G, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Deodhar A, Ostergaard M, Gupta AD, Mpofu S, Fox T, Winseck A, Porter B, Shete A, Gensler LS. Secukinumab Efficacy on Enthesitis in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Four Pivotal Phase III Studies. J Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;48(8):1251-1258. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.201111. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
- Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Machado PM, Gensler LS, Marzo-Ortega H, Sherif B, Quebe-Fehling E, Porter B, Gaillez C, Deodhar A. Achievement of Remission Endpoints with Secukinumab Over 3 Years in Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):273-288. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00269-6. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
- Himmler S, Branner JC, Ostwald DA. The societal impact of a biologic treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a case study based on secukinumab. J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):143-155. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0077. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
- Kvien TK, Conaghan PG, Gossec L, Strand V, Ostergaard M, Poddubnyy D, Williams N, Porter B, Shete A, Gilloteau I, Deodhar A. Secukinumab and Sustained Reduction in Fatigue in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Long-Term Results of Two Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 May;74(5):759-767. doi: 10.1002/acr.24517. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
- Deodhar AA, Miceli-Richard C, Baraliakos X, Marzo-Ortega H, Gladman DD, Blanco R, Das Gupta A, Martin R, Safi J Jr, Porter B, Shete A, Rosenbaum JT. Incidence of Uveitis in Secukinumab-treated Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Data Analysis From Three Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 May;2(5):294-299. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11139. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
- Deodhar A, Gladman DD, McInnes IB, Spindeldreher S, Martin R, Pricop L, Porter B, Safi J Jr, Shete A, Bruin G. Secukinumab Immunogenicity over 52 Weeks in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2020 Apr;47(4):539-547. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.190116. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
- Braun J, Deodhar A, Landewe R, Baraliakos X, Miceli-Richard C, Sieper J, Quebe-Fehling E, Martin R, Porter B, Gandhi KK, van der Heijde D; MEASURE 1 and MEASURE 2 study groups. Impact of baseline C-reactive protein levels on the response to secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis: 3-year pooled data from two phase III studies. RMD Open. 2018 Nov 21;4(2):e000749. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000749. eCollection 2018.
- Wei JC, Baeten D, Sieper J, Deodhar A, Bhosekar V, Martin R, Porter B. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Asian patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: 52-week pooled results from two phase 3 studies. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 May;20(5):589-596. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13094. Epub 2017 May 25. Erratum In: Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;20(7):911.
- Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, Baraliakos X, Dougados M, Emery P, Deodhar A, Porter B, Martin R, Andersson M, Mpofu S, Richards HB; MEASURE 1 Study Group; MEASURE 2 Study Group. Secukinumab, an Interleukin-17A Inhibitor, in Ankylosing Spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2534-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505066.
- Braun J, Buehring B, Baraliakos X, Gensler LS, Porter B, Quebe-Fehling E, Haemmerle S. Effects of secukinumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover biomarkers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year data from a phase 3 study, MEASURE 1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec 13;22(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04930-1.
- Braun J, Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, Baeten D, Sieper J, Emery P, Readie A, Martin R, Mpofu S, Richards HB; MEASURE 1 study group. Effect of secukinumab on clinical and radiographic outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results from the randomised phase III MEASURE 1 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1070-1077. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209730. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
- Deodhar AA, Dougados M, Baeten DL, Cheng-Chung Wei J, Geusens P, Readie A, Richards HB, Martin R, Porter B. Effect of Secukinumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Phase III Randomized Trial (MEASURE 1). Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;68(12):2901-2910. doi: 10.1002/art.39805.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CAIN457F2305
- 2010-024529-18 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.