Comparison of Primary Long Full Coverage Stenting vs Primary Short Spot Stenting for Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

November 26, 2017 updated by: Yonsei University

Hypothesis: Primary long full coverage stenting is superior to primary short spot stenting in the treatment of long (≥80 mm) femoropopliteal artery lesions.

Study design :

  • Prospective, randomized, multi-center study
  • A total of 220 subjects with symptomatic peripheral artery disease of lower limbs who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included.
  • Patients will be randomized in a two by two factorial manner according to the strategy of stenting (long versus short stenting) and the additional use of cilostazol. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1.
  • Patients will be followed clinically for 1 year after the procedure.
  • Angiographic or CT follow-up will be performed at 1 year.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
89

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical criteria:

  1. Age 20 years of older

  2. Symptomatic peripheral artery disease:

    • Moderate or severe claudication (Rutherford category 2 or 3)
    • Critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category 4 or 5)
  3. Patients with signed informed consent

Anatomical criteria:

  1. Target lesion length ≥80 mm by angiographic estimation
  2. Stenosis of more than 50 percent or occlusion of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery
  3. At least one patent (less than 50 percent stenosed) tibioperoneal runoff vessel.

Exclusion Criteria:

Clinical criteria

  1. Acute critical limb ischemia
  2. Severe critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category 6)
  3. Major bleeding history within prior 2 months
  4. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel or contrast agents
  5. Age > 85 years
  6. Severe hepatic dysfunction (> 3 times normal reference values)
  7. Significant renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl
  8. Significant leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis
  9. LVEF < 40% or clinically overt congestive heart failure
  10. Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
  11. Life expectancy <1 year due to comorbidity

Angiographic criteria

  1. Previous bypass surgery or stenting of the superficial femoral artery
  2. Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50% stenosis or occlusion)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: long coverage
Primary long full coverage stenting
Drug: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of femoropopliteal artery lesions with primary long
Patients will be randomized in a two-by-two factorial manner according to the use of IVUS guidance (IVUS guidance vs. no IVUS guidance) for the PCI and the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (100 mg/day aspirin and 75mg/day clopidogrel for 6 months vs. 12 months) after PCI. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1.
Active Comparator: short spot
primary short spot stenting
Drug: short stenting for the primary outcome and use of cilostazol for 12 months for secondary outcome.
Patients will be randomized in a two-by-two factorial manner according to the use of IVUS guidance (IVUS guidance vs. no IVUS guidance) for the PCI and the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (100 mg/day aspirin and 75mg/day clopidogrel for 6 months vs. 12 months) after PCI. Each randomization of the enrolled subjects will be done 1:1.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of binary restenosis
Time Frame: 12months after the index procedure
The rate of binary restenosis (stenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter) in the treated segment 12 months after intervention, as determined by computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or catheter angiography according to the stenting strategy
12months after the index procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle-brachial index, etc
Time Frame: at 12 months according to the stenting strategy
  1. Ankle-brachial index at 12 months according to the stenting strategy
  2. Maximal walking distance at 12 months according to the stenting strategy
  3. The rate of reintervention including repeat endovascular therapy or bypass surgery involving the target lesion
  4. The rate of limb salvage at 12 months according to the stenting strategy
  5. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12 months according to the stenting strategy
at 12 months according to the stenting strategy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Yonsei University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 26, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1-2010-0065

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings