Myocardial Blood Flow by PET and N-13 Ammonia During Regadenoson vs Adenosine Stress

September 3, 2013 updated by: Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Mayo Clinic

Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow by Positron Emission Tomography and N-13 Ammonia During Regadenoson vs Adenosine Stress

Blockage of the heart arteries (coronary artery disease) can lead to angina (chest pain), heart attacks, heart failure, and/or death. Positron emission tomography (PET) stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a powerful tool to help identify blockages in the coronary arteries. During the PET MPI test, a drug is given to mimic the effects of exercise on the heart. The study was done to measure blood flow to the heart using two similar drugs approved to mimic the effects of exercise on the heart in people during a heart stress test. The first drug, called adenosine, has been approved for this use for several decades. The second drug, called regadenoson, was approved in 2008. The investigators were looking at whether the increase in blood flow to the heart with the newer drug (regadenoson) was similar to the increase in blood flow with the older drug (adenosine). This information is important for the use of these drugs in patients and for interpreting the blood flow values.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The hypothesis for this study was that Regadenoson will produce a very similar degree of maximal hyperemia (increased blood flow) as adenosine, the other vasodilator agent. There were only 2 days on study for each subject.

On Day 1 of the study, subjects were interviewed and had a physical exam, including a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) to exclude evidence of silent ischemia or myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular disorders. Subjects were instructed to have a light meal at least 4 hours prior to the PET MPI. Subjects were instructed to abstain from caffeine-containing products for 24 hours prior to the PET scan. Day 1 of the study occurred less than or equal to 4 weeks of Day 2.

On Day 2 of the study, each subject underwent three PET N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) dynamic emission acquisitions: resting, regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 mL IV), and adenosine (140 microgram/kg/min; order of regadenoson vs adenosine was randomized according to subject's birth year), and three transmission acquisitions for attenuation correction. Each emission acquisition was separated by 50 min to allow for radioactive decay. At the end of the drug infusions, subjects were monitored for 5-30 min. Based on the known short biological half-lives of these stress agents, the pharmacologic effects of each drug should have dissipated by the time the next drug was administered.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy male and female volunteers over the age of 30.
  • Written informed consent will be obtained from each subject.
  • Each subject will undergo a history and physical examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any cardiovascular or pulmonary symptoms or exam findings
  • History of low blood pressure (< 90/50 mmHg)
  • Prior cardiac history
  • History of hypertension
  • History of hyperlipidemia
  • History of diabetes mellitus
  • History of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Weight of > 450 pounds
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Other serious illness such as cancer
  • Current smoking
  • Medication use (with the exception of acetaminophen, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and thyroid hormone replacement)
  • Illicit drug use
  • Prior allergic reaction to adenosine, regadenoson, or aminophylline
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Regadenoson, then Adenosine
Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush in the first intervention period. Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes in the second intervention period (after washout period). Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered.
Drug: Regadenoson
Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush.
Other Names:
  • Lexiscan
Drug: Adenosine
Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Adenoscan
Drug: N-13 ammonia
Ammonia N-13 Injection is a radioactive diagnostic agent for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) indicated for diagnostic PET imaging of the myocardium under rest or pharmacologic stress conditions to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected or existing coronary artery disease. The N-13 ammonia used in the study was synthesized by the Mayo Cyclotron Facility as per routine institutional clinical protocol.
Active Comparator: Adenosine, then Regadenoson
Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes in the first intervention period. Three minutes after the start of adenosine infusion, N-13 ammonia (10-20 mCi) was administered. After a washout period, Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush and N-13 ammonia (10-20 MCi) injection and an additional saline flush in the second intervention period.
Drug: Regadenoson
Regadenoson (0.4 mg/5 ml IV) was administered intravenously over 10 seconds, followed immediately by saline flush.
Other Names:
  • Lexiscan
Drug: Adenosine
Adenosine (140 μg/kg/min) was administered intravenously over 6 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Adenoscan
Drug: N-13 ammonia
Ammonia N-13 Injection is a radioactive diagnostic agent for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) indicated for diagnostic PET imaging of the myocardium under rest or pharmacologic stress conditions to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected or existing coronary artery disease. The N-13 ammonia used in the study was synthesized by the Mayo Cyclotron Facility as per routine institutional clinical protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF)
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

MBF is the rate of blood supplied to the myocardium, or heart muscle. Hyperemic MBF is the rate of myocardial blood flow in the heart muscle during either regadenoson or adenosine stress. Myocardial blood flow was calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4).

The Hyperemic MBF was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit.
Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resting Global MBF and Resting Segmental MBF
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 35 minutes after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

MBF is the rate of blood supplied to the myocardium, or heart muscle. Global Myocardial blood flow was calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4).

Regional MBFs were calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). After the apical and basal slices of the left ventricular myocardium were chosen, the software automatically defined 4 myocardial regions of interest (segments) in the apical planes.
Day 2, approximately 35 minutes after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit
Global Cardiac Flow Rate
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit
Cardiac Flow Rate was calculated using the equation: hyperemic MBF/resting MBF.
Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit
Hyperemic Segmental MBF
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit

Regional MBFs were calculated using commercial software (PMOD Technologies, version 2.4). After the apical and basal slices of the left ventricular myocardium were chosen, the software automatically defined 4 myocardial regions of interest (segments) in the apical planes.

The hyperemic MBF was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.
Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit
Segmental CFR
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit
CFR was calculated using the equation: hyperemic MBF/resting MBF.
Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in positron emission tomography (PET) unit
Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute (BPM))
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 35 minutes and approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit
The resting heart rate was measured approximately 35 minutes after arrival in the PET unit. The hyperemic heart rate was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.
Day 2, approximately 35 minutes and approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit
Hyperemic Blood Pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit
Blood pressure was measured approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit, depending on the randomization.
Day 2, approximately 4 hours after arrival in the PET unit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Astellas Pharma Inc

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10-006377

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings