Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Secukinumab in Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis (STATURE)

March 17, 2015 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Double-blind, Double Dummy, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Long-term Efficacy of Intravenous (10mg/kg) and Subcutaneous (300mg) Secukinumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis Who Are Partial Responders to Secukinumab

The study will assess the safety and efficacy of intravenous (10mg/kg) and subcutaneous (300mg) secukinumab in moderate to severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis who are partial responders to secukinumab.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Graz, Austria, A-8036
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Vienna, Austria, A-1220
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wels, Austria, 4600
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M 6L2
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2J 1C4
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2K 4L5
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • France
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toulouse Cedex, France, 31059
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Germany
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22143
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Luebeck, Germany, 23538
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • India
    • Karnataka
      • Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 575 004
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Maharashtra
      • Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, 440 010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nashik, Maharashtra, India, 422 001
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Japan
    • Chiba
      • Kisarazu, Chiba, Japan, 292-8535
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tokyo
      • Hachioji-city, Tokyo, Japan, 193-0998
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 105-8471
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 160-0023
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Slovakia
    • Slovak Republic
      • Kosice, Slovak Republic, Slovakia, 040 15
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33409
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63117
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29651
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Written Informed Consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed,
  • Subject must be able to understand and communicate with the investigator and comply with the requirements of the study.
  • Subjects must have participated in the study CAIN457A2304 and have achieved a partial response after twelve weeks of treatment with no major protocol deviations.

A partial response is defined as having achieved ≥ PASI 50 but < 75 response.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women or lactating women
  • Forms of psoriasis other than chronic plaque -type
  • Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments
  • Ongoing use of other non-psoriasis prohibited treatments
  • Previous exposure to any biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or the IL-17 receptor, except secukinumab in study CAIN457A2304
  • Active ongoing inflammation diseases other than psoriasis that might confound the evaluation of the benefits of secukinumab therapy
  • UV therapy or excessive exposure to sunlight

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AIN457 subcutaneous (s.c.)
During the intravenous (I.V.) period, participants received two 150 mg s.c. injections of AIN457 at randomization and week 4, and AIN457 placebo I.V. at randomization, week 2 and week 4. During the maintenance period, participants received 300 mg s.c. of open-label AIN457.
Drug: secukinumab 150mg
secukinumab 150mg (2 injections per dose)
Experimental: AIN457 I.V.
During the I.V. period, participants received AIN457 10mg/kg I.V. at randomization, week 2 and week 4, and AIN457 placebo s.c. at randomization and week 4. During the maintenance period, participants received 300 mg s.c. of open-label AIN457.
Drug: secukinumab 10mg/kg i.v. regimen
secukinumab 10mg/kg i.v. regimen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants (Who Achieved a Partial Response Defined as ≥ 50% But < 75% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) After 12 Weeks of Treatment in Study AIN457A2304) With 75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI
Time Frame: Week 8
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4).
Week 8
Percentage of Participants (Who Achieved a Partial Response Defined as ≥ 50% But < 75% Improvement in PASI After 12 Weeks of Treatment in Study AIN457A2304) With Investigator's Global Assessment Model 2011 (IGA Mod 2011) 0 or 1 Response
Time Frame: Week 8
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Treatment success was defined as achievement of IGA mod 2001 score of 0 or 1.
Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 50/75/90/100 Response or IGA 0 or 1 Response
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). PASI 50, 75, 90 and 100 were defined as participants achieving ≥ 50%, 75%, 90% or 100% improvement from baseline. The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
PASI is a combined assessment of lesion severity and affected area into a single score: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease). Body is divided into 4 areas for scoring (head, arms, trunk, legs; each area is scored by itself and scores are combined for final PASI. For each area, percent of skin involved is estimated: 0 (0%) to 6 (90-100%), and severity is estimated by clinical signs, erythema, induration and desquamation; scale 0 (none) to 4 (maximum). Final PASI = sum of severity parameters for each area* area score weight of section (head: 0.1, arms: 0.2 body: 0.3 legs: 0.4). A negative mean percentage change indicates improvement.
Baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Percentage of Participants in Each IGA Mod 2011 Score Category
Time Frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
The IGA mod 2011 scale is static, i.e. it referred exclusively to the participant's disease at the time of the assessment, and did not compare with any of the participant's previous disease states at previous visits. The scores are: 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe.
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 40
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, Week 32,up to Week 40
The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral warts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. A DLQI of 0 or 1 indicates no impairment or little impairment, respectively. A negative mean percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, Week 32,up to Week 40
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, weeks 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40
The DLQI is a ten item general dermatology disability index designed to assess health-related quality of life in adult participants with skin diseases such as eczema, psoriasis, acne and viral worts. It is a self-administered questionnaire which includes domains of daily activity, leisure, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, treatment and school/work activities. Each domain has 4 response categories ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). "Not relevant" is a valid score also and is scored as 0. The DLQI total score is a sum of all 10 responses. Scores range from 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating greater health-related quality of life impairment. A negative mean percentage change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, weeks 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in EuroQOL 5-Dimension Health Status Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Health State Assessment (From 0 to 100)
Time Frame: Baseline, weeks 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40
The EQ-5D is an instrument used to assess a participant's health status. The instrument includes a descriptive profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive profile includes 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension had 3 response levels: no problems, some problems and severe problems. The VAS is a vertical scale that assesses the health status from 0 (worst possible health state) to 100 (best possible health state). This outcome measures the percent change in VAS score. Positive mean percent changes indicate improvement.
Baseline, weeks 8, 16, 24, 32 and 40
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-secukinumab Antibodies
Time Frame: Baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 40
The development of anti-secunimubab anti-bodies would decrease a participant's ability to respond to secukinumab treatment.
Baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 40
Relationship Between Response to AIN457 and Failed Response to Previous Biologic Psoriasis Therapy
Time Frame: End of study
This outcome measure was not analyzed due to the small sample size of the study (43 participants).
End of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 17, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CAIN457A2307
  • 2011-002510-36 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plaque-type Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on secukinumab 150mg

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings