A Trial of Acetazolamide Versus Placebo in Preventing Mountain Sickness During Rapid Ascent

June 21, 2013 updated by: Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam

Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Randomised Trial of Acetazolamide Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness During Rapid Ascent

Acute mountain sickness is a common ailment in people venturing over 2500 m altitude. Pilgrims to high altitudes are at an added risk since they are unaware and they gain height faster than the recommendations. Acetazolamide is the standard treatment and prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness. There are no randomized controlled trials that have studied protective effects of Acetazolamide in rapid ascent, and there are few conflicting studies regarding this matter.

This study is a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled trial of Acetazolamide versus placebo in 380 healthy individuals travelling to Gosaikunda Lake of Nepal in rates of ascent that are faster than the recommendations. Acetazolamide 125 mg twice daily and a placebo will be randomly assigned for 3 days and participants will be assessed at 3 stations.

This study will undertake to establish the role of Acetazolamide in Rapid Ascent and will be the first RCT done in this issue.

The investigators hypothesize that Acetazolamide 125mg twice daily given before rapid ascent to high altitude in Nepalese pilgrims will not be superior to placebo in decreasing both the incidence and severity of acute mountain sickness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
380

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Nepal
      • Kathmandu, Nepal
        • Oxford University Clinical Research Unit Nepal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nepalese national
  • Aged 18 to 65
  • Travelling directly from Dhunche to Gosainkunda
  • Rapid ascent as defined by ascent within 3 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of any drugs for the prevention of altitude sickness or headache
  • Current illness
  • Current altitude sickness (more than one mild symptom on the Lake Louise Questionnaire (LLQ), or oxygen saturation less than 75%
  • Known to be pregnant or cannot exclude the possibility of being pregnant, or have missed menses by over 7 days
  • One night within the last 30 days spent at an altitude of 4500 metres or above
  • Residents of altitude more than 2500m
  • A known drug allergy to sulfonamides.
  • Treatment with any of the following in the last 2 days: acetazolamide (Diamox®), steroids (dexamethasone/decadron, prednisone), theophylline or diuretics (Lasix®), ibuprofen/motrin, naprosyn/naproxen, aspirin or acetaminophen.
  • Any serious intracranial abnormalities such as history of brain tumours or pseudotumour cerebri
  • Known severe uncontrolled headache syndrome
  • Diagnosed renal function impairment, diabetes, cirrhosis of liver or liver dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Placebo
Twice daily
Active Comparator: Acetazolamide
Drug: Acetazolamide
125 mg twice daily until 4380 meters altitude

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnosis of acute mountain sickness
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
A diagnosis of AMS requires a score of three or greater on the Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Questionnaire with the mandatory presence of headache and at least one of the following symptoms: dizziness or light-headedness, fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (nausea/vomiting), or difficulty sleeping.
Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
Diagnosis of acute mountain sickness
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days
A diagnosis of AMS requires a score of three or greater on the Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Questionnaire with the mandatory presence of headache and at least one of the following symptoms: dizziness or light-headedness, fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (nausea/vomiting), or difficulty sleeping.
Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
Percent
Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
Heart rate
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
Beats per minute
Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
High altitude headache
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
High altitude headache severity will be scored in milimeters based on patient markings on a visual analog scale. The headache score will be identified on the designated Lake Louise Questionnaire.
Upon reaching an altitude of 3300m, average expected time is 1 day
Blood oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days
Percent
Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days
Heart rate
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days
Beats per minute
Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days
High altitude headache
Time Frame: Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days
High altitude headache severity will be scored in millimeters based on patient markings on a visual analog scale. The headache score will be identified on the designated Lake Louise Questionnaire.
Upon reaching an altitude of 4380m, average expected time is 3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Oxford
Wellcome Trust
Mountain Medicine Society of Nepal

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Buddha Basnyat, MD PhD, University of Oxford

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 16, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 24, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 04NP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Mountain Sickness

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings