An Allergen BioCube (ABC) Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray Compared to Placebo

March 24, 2021 updated by: ORA, Inc.

A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy of Flonase (Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray) Compared to Placebo Nasal Spray in the Allergen BioCube (ABC) Model

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the onset of action of fluticasone propionate nasal spray compared to placebo nasal spray in reducing nasal allergic signs and symptoms following ragweed exposure in the Allergen BioCube (ABC) after up to 14 days of at home dosing.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
        • ORA, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • provide written informed consent and signed HIPAA form;
  • be able and willing to follow all instructions and attend the study visits;
  • if female and of childbearing potential, be not pregnant, nursing or planning a pregnancy, be willing to submit a pregnancy test at Visit 1 and at exit visit, and to use adequate method of birth control
  • have a positive history of seasonal allergic rhinitis to ragweed;
  • have a positive skin test reaction to ragweed of within the past 24 months;
  • manifest sufficient allergic rhinitis symptoms during ragweed exposure in the ABC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known intolerance or allergy to antihistamines or corticosteroids;
  • have a compromised lung function at Visit 1;
  • develop a compromised lung function at Visits 2-6
  • have any presence of active sinus or nasal infection at any visit;
  • have experienced an acute upper or lower respiratory tract infection or acute sinusitis within 30 days of visit 1;
  • have significant nasal anatomical deformities or any condition that does not allow subject to breathe through the nose (includes, but is not limited to: septal deviation, septal perforations, nasal polyps, rhinitis medicamentosa)
  • have had any nasal surgical intervention in the past;
  • have a known history of glaucoma
  • have planned surgery (nasal, ocular or systemic) during the trial period or within 30 days thereafter;
  • inability or refusal to discontinue contact lens wear during all visits;
  • use disallowed medications during the study or appropriate pre-study washout period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Nasal Spray
Two sprays in each nostril daily starting the day in office on Day 0 for up to a 17 day period until Day 16.
Drug: Saline Nasal Spray
two sprays in each nostril once daily
Active Comparator: Fluticasone Propionate
Two sprays in each nostril daily starting the day in office on Day 0 for up to a 17 day period until Day 16.
Drug: Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray
two sprays in each nostril once daily
Other Names:
  • Flonase

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Total Nasal Signs and Symptoms Score From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 5 (Day 16)
Time Frame: pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16

The change in the total sum of the four symptoms (total nasal symptom scores - TNSS) ranging from 0 to 16 with higher score indicating a more severe reaction.

The change in the TNSS score between Day 0 and Day 16 was analyzed.
pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Baseline Nasal Itching Score on Day 0 to Average Nasal Itching Score on Day 16
Time Frame: pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Nasal Itching was assessed by the participants pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16 on a 0-4 scale (0 = none to 4 = severe). The change in average nasal itching score between Day 0 and Day 16 was analyzed.
pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Change in Baseline Sneezing Score on Day 0 to Average Sneezing Score on Day 16
Time Frame: pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Sneezing was assessed by the participants pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16 on a 0-4 scale (0 = none to 4 = severe). The change in average sneezing score between Day 0 and Day 16 was analyzed.
pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Change in Baseline Rhinorrhea Score on Day 0 to Average Rhinorrhea Score on Day 16
Time Frame: pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Rhinorrhea was assessed by the participants pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16 on a 0-4 scale (0 = none to 4 = severe). The change in average rhinorrhea score between Day 0 and Day 16 was analyzed.
pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Change in Baseline Nasal Congestion Score on Day 0 to Average Nasal Congestion Score on Day 16
Time Frame: pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16
Nasal Congestion was assessed by the participants pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16 on a 0-4 scale (0 = none to 4 = severe). The change in average nasal congestion score between Day 0 and Day 16 was analyzed.
pre-ABC exposure and approximately every 15 minutes, up to 180 minutes, while in the ABC on Day 0 and Day 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ORA, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tarek Shazly, MD, ORA, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 11-100-0007

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings