BEtter Control of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive pAtients Monitored Using the HOTMAN® sYstem (BEAUTY)

March 23, 2015 updated by: Hemo Sapiens, Inc.

BEtter Control of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive pAtients Monitored Using the BEtter Control of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive pAtients Monitored Using the HOTMAN® sYstem

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that monitoring hemodynamic parameters and then applying a predefined algorithm of drug selection (i.e. integrated hemodynamic management - IHM) improves the control of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in hypertensive patients, as compared to classical drug selection (i.e. without IHM) during a 6 months intensive treatment program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Early BP control in hypertensives guarantees the best prevention of cardiovascular events on the long term (2007 ESH-ESC Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension; VALUE study). However, in spite of education efforts and antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control rates remain low. The most common cause of uncontrolled BP is inadequate pharmacological treatment, because the selection of antihypertensive agents is often done independently of the hemodynamic status of the patient (volemia, peripheral resistance, cardiac inotropy, heart rate).

Several studies confirmed the value of using impedance cardiography (ICG)-derived hemodynamic data as an adjunct to therapeutic decision-making in the treatment of hypertension.

Working hypothesis: when it is possible to assess the hemodynamic status, and select accordingly the most appropriate pharmacological class of antihypertensive treatment, BP reduction occurs to a greater extent and more rapidly.

In the present study an integrated therapeutic approach (IHM-Integrated Hemodynamic Management)was applied, aiming at detecting permanent vasoconstriction and/or hypervolemia and/or hyperinotropy through the HOTMAN System, in order to select the most appropriate antihypertensive drugs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
183

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Estonia
      • Tallin, Estonia
        • Tallinn Hypertension Excellence Centre
  • France
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
  • Italy
      • Milano, Italy
        • Milano Hypertension Excellence Center
  • Norway
      • Oslo, Norway
        • University of Oslo, Ullevaal Hospital
  • Poland
      • Gdansk, Poland
        • Hypertension Unit, Dpt of Hypertension and diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients of either sex presenting with essential hypertension
  • having sustained hypertension both at office BP (SBP>140 mmHg) and at ABPM (SBP>135 mmHg daytime)
  • treated with 2 to 4 antihypertensive drugs
  • aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years
  • after signature of the Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or lactating female
  • type 1 diabetes
  • patients with pacemaker (ventricular/dual chamber)
  • Severe aortic insufficiency
  • severe hypertension (SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥110 mmHg)
  • resistant hypertension requiring at least 5 antihypertensive drugs
  • secondary hypertension of any aetiology, such as renal disease, pheocromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome
  • serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of the protocol, including cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (criteria for metabolic syndrome), haematological, oncological, neurological, or psychiatric diseases
  • history of the following pathologies within the last 6 months:
  • myocardial infarction
  • unstable angina pectoris
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • bypass surgery
  • congestive heart failure stage III-IV
  • left branch bundle block
  • atrial fibrillation
  • hypertensive encephalopathy
  • stroke
  • extreme obesity (BMI > 35)
  • previously enrolled subjects
  • alcohol or drug abuse in the past 2 years
  • planned hospitalization during the study period
  • participation in any other clinical study within 30 days prior to screening visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: HOTMAN-driven therapeutic approach arm
"Hotman-driven" therapeutic approach arm(group IHM) will receive treatment according to the results of the HOTMAN® System.
Device: Integrated hemodynamic management (IHM) - HOTMAN System
Therapeutic approach according to HOTMAN System measurement(ICG)results .
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control arm
Control arm will receive usual antihypertensive care according to the 2007 ESH Guidelines.
Device: Non Integrated Hemodynamic Management (Non-IHM) - HOTMAN System
Therapeutic approach according to 2007 ESH Guidelines, regardeless HOTMAN results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute change in daytime SBP, under ambulatory conditions (ABPM) after a 6 months follow-up.
Time Frame: baseline and after 6 months of treatment
Absolute change in daytime SBP, under ambulatory conditions (ABPM) after 6 months follow-up.
baseline and after 6 months of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of normalization of SBP (<135 mmHg) at ABPM
Time Frame: baseline and after 6 months of treatment
The percentage of normalization of SBP (<135 mmHg) at ABPM
baseline and after 6 months of treatment
The absolute change from baseline in 24h SBP-ABPM, in 24h DBP-ABPM
Time Frame: baseline and after 6 months of treatment
The absolute change from baseline in 24h SBP-ABPM, in 24h DBP-ABPM
baseline and after 6 months of treatment
Rate of side effects
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 months of treatment
Rate of side effects
from baseline to 6 months of treatment
The normalization of hemodynamics (CI, HR and SSVRI), the normalization of PWV and central BP
Time Frame: baseline and after 6 months of treatment
The normalization of hemodynamics (CI, HR and SSVRI), the normalization of PWV and central BP
baseline and after 6 months of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hemo Sapiens, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephane Laurent, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HS-01-2011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings