Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airways as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation in Children
Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airways as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation in Children
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60614
- Childrens Memorial Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children undergoing general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation
- Weight 5-20 kg
- Age one month-six years
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class IV, V Emergency procedures
- History of a difficult airway
- Active upper respiratory tract infection
- Children receiving emergent surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ambu Aura-i size 1.5
patients will receive either the Ambu Aura-i size 1.5 or air-Q ILA 1.5 based on manufacturer recommendations of body weight
|
Device will be placed and fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be performed and timed.
Laryngeal grade of view will also be assessed
|
|
Experimental: air-Q size 1.5
patients will receive either the Ambu Aura-i size 1.5 or air-Q ILA 1.5 based on manufacturer recommendations of body weight
|
Device will be placed and fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be performed and timed.
Laryngeal grade of view will also be assessed
|
|
Experimental: Ambu Aura-i size 2
patients will receive either the Ambu Aura-i size 2 or air-Q ILA 2 based on manufacturer recommendations of body weight
|
Device will be placed and fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be performed and timed.
Laryngeal grade of view will also be assessed
|
|
Experimental: air-Q size 2
patients will receive either the Ambu Aura-i size 2 or air-Q ILA 2 based on manufacturer recommendations of body weight
|
Device will be placed and fiberoptic tracheal intubation will be performed and timed.
Laryngeal grade of view will also be assessed
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease and time to successful tracheal intubation
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
from the time of fiberoptic bronchoscope entry into the device until positive clinical signs indicating successful tracheal intubation (i.e., presence of bilateral breath sounds, appropriate end-tidal CO2) are confirmed
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
The laryngeal alignment through the devices will be graded using an established scoring system
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Ease and time to place airway
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
From picking up the airway device to bilateral chest expansion and presence of ETCO2
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Number of attempts to place the supraglottic device and tracheal tube
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
number of attempts needed for successful placement will be recorded (maximum of 3 attempts; >3 attempts will be considered as a failure)
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Airway Leak Pressure
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Airway leak pressures will be measured by recording the circuit pressure at which equilibrium is reached when fresh gas flow is delivered at 3L/min when the pressure limiting valve is closed completely
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Time to remove device
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
removal will be done with the use of a removal stylet.
Should inadvertent extubation occur during removal of the device, the intubation will be deemed a failure.
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Airway maneuvers
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
The number and type of various airway maneuvers such as jaw thrust, neck extension, advancement/ withdrawal of the supraglottic device, and/ or anterior Laryngeal Pressure to optimize tracheal intubation will be recorded
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively
|
complications such as oxygen desaturations, inadvertent extubation, tracheal pilot balloon breakage, mucosal trauma, reflex activation of the airway, sore throat, dysphonia will be recorded
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's hospital of Chicago
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jagannathan N, Kozlowski RJ, Sohn LE, Langen KE, Roth AG, Mukherji II, Kho MF, Suresh S. A clinical evaluation of the intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in children. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):176-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fe0408. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
- Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Mankoo R, Langen KE, Mandler T. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03703.x. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
- Sinha R, Chandralekha, Ray BR. Evaluation of air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in infants--a pilot study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Feb;22(2):156-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03710.x.
- Baker PA, Brunette KE, Byrnes CA, Thompson JM. A prospective randomized trial comparing supraglottic airways for flexible bronchoscopy in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Sep;20(9):831-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03362.x.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Air-Q versus Ambu-Aura-i
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.