Pioglitazone in Patients With Mood Disorders

March 30, 2017 updated by: Natalie Rasgon, Stanford University

Pioglitazone Treatment for Insulin Resistant Patients With Mood Disorders

The purpose of this study is to see how an insulin sensitizing medication, Pioglitazone, can cause changes in mood in some depressed patients. Study participants receive assessment of their cognitive and metabolic functioning.

If they meet criteria, they will be asked to take either Pioglitazone or a placebo for a 90-day trial. Participants will undergo an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test to measure fasting insulin and glucose levels, as well as routine blood testing.

The investigators hope to quantify the role of Pioglitazone in patients with mood disorders and compare the values to those previously obtained in a healthy age-matched control population. The investigators also hope to examine the association between IR and cognitive performance and clinical course of depression in patients with mood disorders.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

While the association between insulin resistance (IR) and depressive symptoms is well documented (Gold et al., 2005), causal aspects of the relationship are incompletely documented and likely bidirectional. As the current prevalence rates of DM2 and related diseases grow worldwide and its associated metabolic consequences become more salient, it is increasingly critical to understand the role of IR in depressive disorders.

Insulin has been shown to alter central nervous system (CNS) concentrations of neurotransmitters such as dopamine (Lozovsky et al., 1981) and norepinephrine (Boyd et al., 1985), by a variety of mechanisms, as well as to have direct electrophysiological effects on neuronal activity (Boyd et al., 1985). Additionally, induced IR in the CNS has been shown to result in cognitive and behavioral alterations in animal models (Kovacs and Hajnal, 2009).

Accordingly, when depression manifests as a sequela of metabolic disorders such as obesity and DM2, it is hypothesized to be associated with resistance of CNS structures to the effects of insulin, which may derive from genetic polymorphisms, as well as from long-term exposure to excess amounts of circulating insulin due to peripheral IR (Okamura et al., 2000b). Thus, "overcoming" central IR," for example by pharmacological interventions, could be an attractive strategy in the treatment and prevention of these disorders.

This study aimed to assess mood effects in a 12-week double-blind, randomized-controlled trial of adjuvant treatment with the PPARγ-agonist pioglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing agent, compared with treatment with placebo, in participants with non-psychotic, non-remitting depression receiving standard psychiatric regimens for unipolar or bipolar depression. Pioglitazone is an FDA-approved, insulin-sensitizing treatment for DM2 and has particularly beneficial effects on lipid profile (Goldberg et al., 2005) and rate of cardiovascular events (Lincoff et al., 2007) in this population. Furthermore, in assessing the utility of an additive insulin-sensitizing agent on mood outcomes in both insulin sensitive and insulin resistant patients, this study attempted to disentangle the role of insulin-sensitizing and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

In an a prior manner, this study's aims were twofold: (1) to assess whether treatment with pioglitazone would result in significantly greater mood improvement compared to treatment with placebo among patients with unremitted depression despite treatment as usual (TAU) and (2) to examine mechanisms of proposed effects of a PPARγ-agonist on mood outcomes by comparing treatment outcomes based on surrogate markers of glucose metabolic status (hereafter referred to IR and IS) between IR and insulin sensitive (IS) participants.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 20 and 65 years
  • BMI between 25 and 35
  • Diagnosis of unipolar, non-psychotic, non-melancholic major depressive disorder (MDD) or depressive episode of bipolar disorder (Bipolar I, II or NOS)
  • Depression severity as defined by score of < 12 on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and no psychiatric admission within 6 months from study entry and no suicide attempt within the last 12 months
  • Willingness to sign human subjects consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of possible or probable cognitive impairment
  • For women only: pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • Personal history of Type I or Type II diabetes
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease or other major medical condition, or history of myocardial infarction within the previous year
  • Significant cerebrovascular disease, as evidenced by neurological examination, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 170 or diastolic blood pressures > 100)
  • Current drug or alcohol abuse
  • History of neurological disorder, e.g. multiple sclerosis, stroke etc
  • Use of any drug that may significantly affect psychometric testing or the insulin testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Pioglitazone
50% of participants will be allocated to 12 weeks of treatment with 30 mg/day of Pioglitazone.
Drug: Pioglitazone
30mg once daily for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Actos
Placebo Comparator: Sugar pill
50% of participants will be randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with placebo pill.
Drug: Sugar Pill
Placebo
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The HDRS-21 was used to screen for unremitted depression. The HDRS-21 is scored on a scale from 0 to 21, where 0 is the lowest level of depression severity and 21 is the highest level of depression severity. Unremitted depression is characterized by a score of ≥7. The HDRS-21 scores at baseline are shown in the data table below.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fasting Insulin Measurements at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
The fasting plasma insulin measurements taken at baseline are shown in the data table below.
Baseline
Change in HDRS-21: From Baseline to 12 Weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The HDRS-21 was administered at baseline and at the end of 12 weeks, and the mean difference between the two time points was calculated. The HDRS-21 is scored on a scale from 0 to 21, where 0 is the lowest level of depression severity and 21 is the highest level of depression severity.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Natalie Rasgon, MD, PhD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 21, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R21MH093948-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings