Acceptability of Depo-subQ Provera 104 in Uniject vs. Intramuscular Depo-Provera Among HIV+ Women & Providers, Uganda
Acceptability of Depo-subQ Provera 104 in Uniject Versus Intramuscular Depo-Provera Among HIV-positive Women and Family Planning Providers in Rakai, Uganda
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kalisizo, Uganda
- Rakai Health Sciences Program
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- HIV+
- Woman aged 18-45
- Wishes to prevent pregnancy by use of injectable contraception and intends to continue using injectable contraception for next nine months
- Medically eligible for injectable contraception
- Capable of providing informed consent
- Willing to provide contact information
- Agrees to trial participation
- Intends to live in the area for the next nine months
- May or may not be currently using a first-line antiretroviral therapy regimen (includes: AZT/3TC/EFV; AZT/3TC/NVP; CBV/EFV; D4T/3TC/EFV; D4T/3TC/NVP; TDF/3TC/EFV; TDF/3TC/NVP)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently pregnant
- Desires pregnancy within next nine months
- Contraindications to using injectable contraception
- On second-line antiretroviral therapy regimen
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
OTHER: Depo-SubQ Provera 104 in Uniject
|
DepoSubQ Provera 104 in Uniject
|
|
OTHER: Intramuscular DMPA
|
Intramuscular DMPA
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Preferred injection method
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Preference for subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, or no preference between the two
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability, satisfaction, and problems encountered with subcutaneous injection versus intramuscular injection, as reported by HIV/family planning care providers
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 months
|
E.g., problems encountered, preference to give more, same amount, or fewer of each kind of injection, advantages and disadvantages of each kind of injection, difficulty of administration, perception of client experience, which type of injectable prefers to administer, whether preferences are impacted by HIV status of client
|
Baseline, 10 months
|
|
Hypothetical acceptability of contraceptive injections provided by community health care worker, trained and trusted friend or family member, or self-administration
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
In this study, all injections will be provided by a trained medical professional, but we will ask women if they would hypothetically find provision by community health workers, a trained trusted friend or family member, or self-administration acceptable
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Pregnancy incidence
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
|
Will not be compared according to study product, since all participants will utilize both products in this crossover trial.
|
3 months, 6 months
|
|
Side effects
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Including pain/injection/soreness at injection site and other reported side effects
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Continuation of use of injectables
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
|
Proportion of enrolled women who continue using injectable contraception at follow up visits
|
3 months, 6 months
|
|
Future use intentions
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Whether plans to use injectable contraception again in three months
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Likelihood of recommending method to a friend
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
How likely participant would be to recommend this contraceptive method to a friend
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Level of satisfaction with method
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Level of satisfaction with method of contraception injection received
|
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ron H Gray, MD, MSC, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
- Contraceptive Agents, Hormonal
- Contraceptive Agents
- Reproductive Control Agents
- Contraceptives, Oral
- Contraceptive Agents, Female
- Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic
- Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal
- Contraceptive Agents, Male
- Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
- Medroxyprogesterone
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00003213
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.