Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LC15-0444 Compared With Sitagliptin Added to Ongoing Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

May 17, 2012 updated by: LG Life Sciences

A Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, Double-blind, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LC15-0444 Compared With Sitagliptin Added to Ongoing Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Alone

Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, multinational (South Korea and India), parallel group study The study was divided into three parts: part 1 was a screening period started with an initial 2 weeks of exercise/diet program; part 2 was a double-blind treatment period during which eligible patients were randomized to Sitagliptin 100 mg qd (once daily), LC15-0444 25 mg bid (twice daily), or LC15-0444 50 mg qd groups and received the assigned treatment for 24 weeks; part 3 was for those patients who completed part 1 & 2 and consented to receive another 28 weeks of treatment with LC15-0444 50 mg qd.

Screening tests were performed on the patients who had given the written informed consent. After 2-week exercise/diet program according to the generally recognized guideline, eligible patients were assigned one of three treatment groups with 1:1:1 ratio. During the total of 24-week treatment period of part 2, each patient visited the study site at Week 6, 12, 18, and 24. Completing double-blind treatment for 24 weeks, each patient was asked to provide consent to participate in the part 3 of the study where all the patients were to receive LC15-0444 50 mg once daily. During 28-week treatment period of the part 3, each patient visited the study

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
425

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  2. Adults between 18 and 75 years of age
  3. Patients with HbA1c between 7% and 11%
  4. Patients treated with metformin monotherapy for at least 12 weeks and treated with 1000 mg/day or higher dose of metformin for at least 4 weeks right before screening
  5. Patients who signed on the consent form after informed on the object, method, and risks of the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, gestational diabetes, or secondary diabetes
  2. Patients who were taking or needed to take any drugs which may affect the control of blood glucose significantly (ex. glucocorticoids)
  3. Patients who had experienced myocardial infarction, unstable angina or prior history of coronary artery bypass surgery within 6 months prior to screening, or patients with arrhythmia requiring treatment
  4. Patients with NYHA class II-IV congestive heart failure
  5. Patients with history of hepatic cirrhosis
  6. Patients with renal failure or whose creatinine clearance was less than 60 ml/min
  7. Patients with dysfunctional thyroid gland (with abnormal level of TSH)
  8. Patients with ALT, AST or CPK exceeding 2.5 times of the upper limit of the normal range
  9. Patients with BMI below 20 kg/m2 or exceeding 40 kg/m2
  10. Patients with history of asthma or major skin allergy
  11. Patients taking thyroid hormone, warfarin, dicoumarin or digoxin.
  12. Patients with history of hypersensitivity to metformin or biguanides.
  13. Patients with history of hypersensitivity to thiazolidinediones
  14. Patients who took sodium channel blockers in the last 6 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  15. Patients who were treated with insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue or who took thiazolidinediones (Glitazone) in the last 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  16. Patients with other reasons who the investigator decided not to be eligible for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: LC15-0444 25 mg bid
LC15-0444 25 mg bid(twice daily)added on Metformin therapy
Drug: LC15-0444 25mg bid
Each patient was given 3 different bottles of study drugs that comprised of two morning bottles and one evening bottles. Each morning bottle contained LC15-0444 25 mg or 50 mg or Sitagliptin 100mg(depending on the randomized group) or its matching placebo while the evening bottle contained LC15-0444 25 mg or its matching placebo. Patient was instructed to take 1 tablet from each bottle at regular times in the morning and evening every day during the 24-week double-blind treatment period.
Experimental: LC15-0444 50 mg qd
LC15-0444 50 mg qd(once daily) added on Metformin therapy
Drug: LC15-0444 50mg qd
Each patient was given 3 different bottles of study drugs that comprised of two morning bottles and one evening bottles. Each morning bottle contained LC15-0444 25 mg or 50 mg or Sitagliptin 100mg(depending on the randomized group) or its matching placebo while the evening bottle contained LC15-0444 25 mg or its matching placebo. Patient was instructed to take 1 tablet from each bottle at regular times in the morning and evening every day during the 24-week double-blind treatment period.
Active Comparator: Sitagliptin 100mg qd
Sitagliptin 100 mg qd (once daily) added on the Metformin therapy
Drug: Sitagliptin 100mg qd
Each patient was given 3 different bottles of study drugs that comprised of two morning bottles and one evening bottles. Each morning bottle contained LC15-0444 25 mg or 50 mg or Sitagliptin 100mg(depending on the randomized group) or its matching placebo while the evening bottle contained LC15-0444 25 mg or its matching placebo. Patient was instructed to take 1 tablet from each bottle at regular times in the morning and evening every day during the 24-week double-blind treatment period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of HbAlc
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 24
from baseline to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c Responder Rate
Time Frame: at Week 24
responder rate of HbA1c <7%, <6.5% at week 24
at Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
LG Life Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sun Woo Kim, MD, PhD, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 15, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 17, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LG-DPCL006

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on LC15-0444 25mg bid

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings