Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (INCA)

February 15, 2016 updated by: Esther Marco Navarro, Parc de Salut Mar

The INCA Study: Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a high intensity short duration inspiratory muscle training is feasible, secure and effective to improve respiratory muscle function (strength and resistance), health-related quality of life, and to assess potential correlations with health resources utilization.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) often refer exercise intolerance, marked fatigue and dyspnea at low exercise intensities. This characteristic feature might be generated by respiratory and skeletal muscle dysfunction, and it´s has been described as a comorbid status, reflecting the systemic impact of heart failure. Despite the availability of effective pharmacologic treatments, patients with CHF continue to experience progressively worsening symptoms, frequent hospital admission and premature death. Reduced physical functioning, role limitation, and lack of energy may interfere with daily activities as the condition worsens and thereby severely reduce the quality of life in CHF patients. The ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure recommend exercise training as an adjunctive approach to improve clinical status in stable adult patients with current or prior symptoms of heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. A wide variety of studies have focussed on respiratory muscles abnormalities in CHF patients. Reduced strength and endurance of respiratory muscles are currently recognized as additional factors implicated in the limited exercise response and quality of life, as well as in a poor prognosis. Additionally, inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has shown to result in improvements on inspiratory strength, functional capacity, ventilatory response to exercise, recovery oxygen uptake kinetics, and quality of life of CHF patients with respiratory muscle weakness. The optimal training scheme remains still to be defined. Most of clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of a low-intensity IMT (maximum 38 cmH2O), but there is little information of the training effects when using higher training loads. Our research group has demonstrated that a short-time high-intensity respiratory training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease afford to reach good functional results in a shorter time, which affords to make more efficient in terms of time the rehabilitation program and to reach to more patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
        • Hospital Del Mar

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age over 18 years;
  2. chronic heart failure (CHF) of any etiology;
  3. clinically stable condition, with no worsening of heart failure or change in cardiac medication in the previous 3 months and during the study; and
  4. ability to understand and accept the trial procedures and to sign an informed consent form in accordance with national legislation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. previous history of any chronic respiratory disease;

  2. not to have performed any kind of general or respiratory training in the previous 3 months.

    • Prior to randomization, all patients' clinical assessment and echocardiographic measurements were done by a cardiologist and all patients underwent pulmonary function tests.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High-intensity IMT
High intensity short duration respiratory muscle training (IMT) using a dual-vave prototype
Device: High-intensity IMT
High intensity short duration respiratory muscle training with a valve prototype
Other Names:
  • Orygen-Dual valve prototype
Active Comparator: Sham High-intensity IMT
High intensity short duration respiratory muscle training (IMT) using a sham dual-vave prototype
Device: Sham High-intensity IMT
High intensity short duration respiratory muscle training using a sham valve prototype
Other Names:
  • Sham Orygen-Dual valve prototype

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in respiratory muscle function strength
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 weeks
Transducer measuring maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures
Baseline to 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline to 4 weeks
Minnesotta Living wih Heart Failure Questionnaire and Short Form 36
Baseline to 4 weeks
Adverse effects from training
Time Frame: Baseline to week 4
Adverse events collection by investigator
Baseline to week 4
Health care utilization
Time Frame: Baseline to one year
Hospital admissions and emergency room visits
Baseline to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Parc de Salut Mar

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Ferran Escalada, Md, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 17, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INCA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings