Comparison of Senza to Commercial Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain (SENZA-RCT)
Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Demonstrate Non-Inferiority of the Senza™ Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System in the Treatment of Chronic Pain as Compared to Commercially Available SCS Devices
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs (VAS ≥ 5) which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 3 months.
- Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician
- Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
- Be willing and capable of giving informed consent
- Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator
- Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome, as determined by a psychologist
- Have a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, progressive peripheral vascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Have a diagnosis of scoliosis that precludes lead placement
- Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker
- Have prior experience with SCS
- Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy
- Have metastatic malignant disease or active local malignant disease
- Have a life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Have an active systemic or local infection
- Be pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal)
- Have within 6 months of enrollment a significant untreated addiction to dependency producing medications or have been a substance abuser (including alcohol and illicit drugs)
- Be concomitantly participating in another clinical study
- Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation
- Have a pending or approved worker's compensation claim
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Test
Subjects randomized to this arm will be trialed and implanted with the Nevro Senza System
|
Non-inferior comparison of implantable spinal cord stimulators
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Subjects randomized to this arm will be trialed and implanted with a commercially available SCS system.
|
Non-inferior comparison of implantable spinal cord stimulators
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in back pain VAS and neurological status from Baseline
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The primary endpoint is a composite of effectiveness and safety.
Specifically, the primary endpoint is the percentage of randomized subjects (the ITT analysis population) and subjects completing the Primary Efficacy Assessment (the PP analysis population) who respond to SCS therapy (as assessed by VAS) for back pain and do not have a stimulation-related neurological deficit at the Primary Efficacy Assessment (non-inferiority analysis).
Subjects who do not have a successful Trial Phase are considered failures (non-responders) toward the primary endpoint.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change in disability as measured by Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months
|
3, 6, 12 months
|
|
Number of subjects with adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Leonardo Kapural, MD, The Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CA2011 US
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.