Effect of Neurokinin-1 Receptor (NK1R) Antagonism on Pruritus in Patients With Sezary Syndrome
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37235
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Known Sezary Syndrome
- Pruritus uncontrolled by conventional treatment. Baseline visual analogue scale > 4.
- Age 18 through 80 years of age.
- Stable medication regimens for both Sezary Syndrome and pruritus for 3 months prior to study participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known hepatic impairment (defined as liver function tests >3 times the upper limit of normal).
- Pregnancy (all women of child-bearing potential will undergo urine beta-hcg testing).
- Concurrent use of pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole, or cisapride.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Aprepitant
Aprepitant will be given orally in a dose of 125mg on day 1 and 80mg daily on each subsequent day for a total of 7 days.
|
Aprepitant will be given orally in a dose of 125mg on day 1 and 80mg daily on each subsequent day for a total of 7 days.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching placebo will be given in place of aprepitant
|
Placebo will be given orally for a total of 7 days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Severity of Pruritus
Time Frame: one week
|
The primary endpoint is the severity of pruritus as measured on the visual analogue scale.
A score of 100 indicated the worst pruritus imaginable, while 0 indicated no pruritus.
|
one week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life
Time Frame: one week
|
The secondary endpoint is the quality of life as measured on the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI). For a series of 10 questions the responses are scored: Very much, scored 3; A lot, scored 2; A little, scored 1; Not at all, scored 0; Not relevant, scored 0; and Question unanswered, scored 0. The scores are summed and the larger the score the greater the effect of the dermatological disease impact on quality of life. Maximum response for all ten questions 30, minimum 0. |
one week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nancy J Brown, MD, Vanderbilt University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Valipour A, Jager M, Wu P, Schmitt J, Bunch C, Weberschock T. Interventions for mycosis fungoides. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD008946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3.
- Bernengo MG, Novelli M, Quaglino P, Lisa F, De Matteis A, Savoia P, Cappello N, Fierro MT. The relevance of the CD4+ CD26- subset in the identification of circulating Sezary cells. Br J Dermatol. 2001 Jan;144(1):125-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04014.x.
- Booken N, Heck M, Nicolay JP, Klemke CD, Goerdt S, Utikal J. Oral aprepitant in the therapy of refractory pruritus in erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Mar;164(3):665-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10108.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28. No abstract available.
- Duval A, Dubertret L. Aprepitant as an antipruritic agent? N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1415-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0906670. No abstract available.
- Cevikbas F, Steinhoff M, Ikoma A. Role of spinal neurotransmitter receptors in itch: new insights into therapies and drug development. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2011 Dec;17(6):742-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00201.x. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
- Lambeir AM, Durinx C, Scharpe S, De Meester I. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV from bench to bedside: an update on structural properties, functions, and clinical aspects of the enzyme DPP IV. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2003 Jun;40(3):209-94. doi: 10.1080/713609354.
- Ahmad S, Wang L, Ward PE. Dipeptidyl(amino)peptidase IV and aminopeptidase M metabolize circulating substance P in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Mar;260(3):1257-61.
- Heymann E, Mentlein R. Liver dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV hydrolyzes substance P. FEBS Lett. 1978 Jul 15;91(2):360-4. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)81210-1. No abstract available.
- Mussap CJ, Geraghty DP, Burcher E. Tachykinin receptors: a radioligand binding perspective. J Neurochem. 1993 Jun;60(6):1987-2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03484.x.
- Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 5;358(23):2482-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706547. No abstract available.
- Olsen E, Vonderheid E, Pimpinelli N, Willemze R, Kim Y, Knobler R, Zackheim H, Duvic M, Estrach T, Lamberg S, Wood G, Dummer R, Ranki A, Burg G, Heald P, Pittelkow M, Bernengo MG, Sterry W, Laroche L, Trautinger F, Whittaker S; ISCL/EORTC. Revisions to the staging and classification of mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome: a proposal of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the cutaneous lymphoma task force of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Blood. 2007 Sep 15;110(6):1713-22. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-055749. Epub 2007 May 31. Erratum In: Blood. 2008 May 1;111(9):4830.
- Vonderheid EC, Bernengo MG, Burg G, Duvic M, Heald P, Laroche L, Olsen E, Pittelkow M, Russell-Jones R, Takigawa M, Willemze R; ISCL. Update on erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: report of the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Jan;46(1):95-106. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.118538.
- Zic JA, Straka BT, McGirt LY, Nian H, Yu C, Brown NJ. Aprepitant for the Treatment of Pruritus in Sezary Syndrome: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1221-1222. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2510.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Skin Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Lymphatic Diseases
- Immunoproliferative Disorders
- Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
- Disease
- Skin Manifestations
- Lymphoma
- Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous
- Lymphoma, T-Cell
- Syndrome
- Pruritus
- Sezary Syndrome
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Antiemetics
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
- Aprepitant
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 110806
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.