Pregabalin in Preventing Acute Pain Syndrome in Patients Receiving Paclitaxel

April 4, 2018 updated by: Academic and Community Cancer Research United

RC11C3, Pilot Placebo-controlled Evaluation of Pregabalin as a Means to Prevent the Paclitaxel-Associated Acute Pain Syndrome

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies pregabalin in preventing acute pain syndrome in patients receiving paclitaxel. Pregabalin may control the pain caused by cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To obtain pilot data regarding the possible effect of pregabalin on pain related to paclitaxel-associated acute pain syndrome (P-APS). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To obtain pilot data regarding the possible effect of pregabalin on paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. II. To obtain pilot data regarding the possible relative toxicities related to pregabalin therapy in this study situation. TERTIARY OBJECTIVES: I. To characterize neurological testing abnormalities that might occur with the P-APS, and to evaluate neurological testing abnormalities during the period of the longer-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). II. To determine the PRO incidence and characteristics of, and change in, P-APS and paclitaxel induced more chronic CIPN over several cycles. These data will serve to confirm the results obtained in our previous natural history study N08C1. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive pregabalin orally (PO) twice daily (BID), beginning on the first night of chemotherapy, for 12 weeks and then once daily (QD) for 1 week. ARM II: Patients receive placebo PO BID, beginning on the first night of chemotherapy, for 12 weeks and then QD for 1 week. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 30 days for 6 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214
        • Cancer Center of Kansas
    • Minnesota
      • Duluth, Minnesota, United States, 55805
        • Essentia Health-Duluth CCOP
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic
      • Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States, 56303
        • Coborn Cancer Center at Saint Cloud Hospital
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68106
        • Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
    • Wisconsin
      • Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States, 54449
        • Marshfield Clinic - Marshfield Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or equal to 18 years
  • Ability to complete questionnaires by themselves or with assistance Paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m^2 given, in the adjuvant setting, every week for a planned course of 12 weeks without any other concurrent therapy
  • Paclitaxel at a dose of 80 mg/m2 given, in the adjuvant (postoperative or neo-adjuvant) setting, every week for a planned course of 12 weeks without any other concurrent cytotoxic chemotherapy (trastuzumab and/or other antibody and/or small molecule treatment is allowed, except for PARP inhibitors).
  • Life expectancy > 6 months
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
  • Negative pregnancy test (serum or urine) done =< 7 days prior to registration, for women of childbearing potential only (per clinician discretion)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • Nursing women
  • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception since this study involves agents that have known genotoxic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects
  • Previous diagnosis of diabetic or other peripheral neuropathy
  • Current, planned or previous use, within last 6 months, of gabapentin or pregabalin
  • History of allergic or other adverse reactions to gabapentin or pregabalin
  • Significant renal insufficiency with a history of a creatinine clearance (CrCL) < 30ml/min
  • Prior exposure to neurotoxic chemotherapy
  • Seizure history
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Previous exposure to paclitaxel

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm I (pain therapy)
Patients receive pregabalin PO BID, beginning on the first night of chemotherapy, for 12 weeks and then QD for 1 week.
Other: questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
Drug: pregabalin
Given PO
Other Names:
  • Lyrica
  • 3-Isobutyl GABA
  • CI-1008
  • PD-144723
Placebo Comparator: Arm II (placebo)
Patients receive placebo PO BID, beginning on the first night of chemotherapy, for 12 weeks and then QD for 1 week.
Other: questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
Drug: placebo
Given PO
Other Names:
  • PLCB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Worst of the Pain Scores for the Week Following the First Cycle of Paclitaxel Administration, Paclitaxel-associated Acute Pain Syndrome (P-APS) Pain Score
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
Worst of the pain scores for the week following the first cycle of paclitaxel administration, as measured by a question on the daily post-paclitaxel questionnaire. Worst pain over the first 6 days following treatment initiation. Higher scores represent more pain (0: No aches or pains -10: Aches or pains as bad as can be).
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
Maximum of the Average Pain Scores (Item 3, Appendix IV) Over the Period From Treatment Initiation to Day 7 (for Cycle 1).
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
Maximum of average pain scores over 6 days following initiation of treatment. Average pain over the first 6 days following treatment initiation. Maximum of the average pain scores (item 3, appendix IV; "Please rate the same aches/pain by circling the ONE number that best describes your aches/pains on the AVERAGE in the last 24 hours.") over the period from treatment initiation to day 7 (for cycle 1). Higher scores represent more pain (0: No aches or pains -10: Aches or pains as bad as can be).
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area Under the Curve Per Assessment (aAUCpa) of Worst, Average and Least Pain (Items 1-3 Appendix IV) for the First Cycle of Treatment.
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
Average Area Under the Curve per assessment (aAUCpa) of worst, average, and least pain (items 1-3 app. IV; "Please rate any aches/pains that are NEW since your last dose of paclitaxel, and that you think might be related to your chemotherapy treatment by circling ONE number that best describes your aches/pains at its WORST in the last 24 hours.", "Please rate the same aches/pains by circling the ONE number that best describes your aches/pains at its LEAST in the last 24 hours.", "Please rate the same aches/pain by circling the ONE number that best describes your aches/pains on the AVERAGE in the last 24 hours.") for the first cycle of treatment. Scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, where 100=better outcome QOL. The aAUCpa is the average of each AUC between each sequential assessment from treatment-initiation to the day-6 assessment.
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Considered At Least Possibly Related to Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, day 8 prior to each paclitaxel course, and then every 30 days for 6 months after completion of study treatment
The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine toxicity patterns within patient groups. In addition, we will review all adverse event data that is graded as 3, 4, or 5 and classified as either "unrelated" or "unlikely to be related" to study treatment in the event of an actual relationship developing. The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below.
Baseline, day 8 prior to each paclitaxel course, and then every 30 days for 6 months after completion of study treatment
The Percentage of Patients Who Use Non-prescription Pain Medications
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 months.
The percentage of patients who use non-prescription pain medications are reported by arm below.
From treatment initiation to 6 months.
The Percentage of Patients Taking Opioid Medications
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 months.
The percentage of patients taking opioid medications are reported below by arm.
From treatment initiation to 6 months.
The Percentage of Patients Who Report the Development of New Aches/Pains That They Attribute to Paclitaxel
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The percentage of patients who report the development of new aches/pains that they attribute to paclitaxel in the first week of chemotherapy are reported by arm below.
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The Worst Pain Reported at the End of the Week for the Overall Week (Item 2 Appendix V)
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The worst pain reported at the end of the week for the overall week ("New aches and pains at their worst over the past week") are reported below. This question was only supposed to be answered by patients who responded "yes" to the first question. Currently, all responses are included, regardless of whether the patient should've responded or not. The worst pain reported at the end of the week for the overall week (item 2 appendix V: "Please rate any aches/pains that you have by circling ONE number that best describes your aches/pains at its worst over the last week.") Higher scores represent more pain (0: No aches or pains -10: Aches or pains as bad as can be).
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The Percentage of Patients Who Report, at Week's End, Using Non-prescription Pain Medications
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The percentage of patients who report, at week's end, using non-prescription pain medications ("Have you used non-prescription meds like aspirin, Tylenol, Motrin, Ibuprofen, or Advil over the past week?") are reported by arm below. This question was only supposed to be answered by patients who responded "yes" to the first question. Currently, all responses are included, regardless of whether the patient should've responded or not.
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The Percentage of Patients Who Report, at Week's End, Using Opioids
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
The percentage of patients who report, at week's end, using opioids ("Have you used opioids like codeine, oxycodone, or morphine for this pain over the past week?") are reported by arm below. This question was only supposed to be answered by patients who responded "yes" to the first question. Currently, all responses are included, regardless of whether the patient should've responded or not.
From treatment initiation to 6 days following treatment initiation; up to 7 days
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of EORTC Sensory, Autonomic, and Motor Neuropathy Subscales
Time Frame: From treatment initiation to 6 months.
Average Area Under the Curve per assessment (aAUCpa) of EORTC Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurophathy Module (EORTC QLQ-CIPN20) Sensory, Autonomic, and Motor Neuropathy Subscales. The EORTC CIPN20 scoring algorithm was used for the sensory (items 31-36, 39, 40 and 48), motor (items 37, 38, 41-45, 49), and autonomic (items 46, 47, 50) subscale scores on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores represent fewer symptoms (better QOL). The aAUCpa for each subscale is calculated as the average of each AUC between each sequential assessment from treatment-initiation to the 6-month assessment. For example; for each patient and each subscale, the subscale values at treatment-initiation and assessment-1 are used to calculate an Area Under the Curve (AUC) for that assessment time-period. Then these AUCs for all available assessment time-periods up to 6-months are averaged to yield the aAUCpa per patient per subcale.
From treatment initiation to 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Academic and Community Cancer Research United

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 9, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RC11C3
  • NCI-2011-03646 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings