Clipped Versus Handsewn Arteriovenous Fistula Anastomosis
The Safety and Effectiveness of Clipped Technique vs. Hand-Sewn Technique for Anastomosis in Arteriovenous Fistulas
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States, 54601
- Gundersen Lutheran Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older.
- Need for AVF creation for vascular access for planned hemodialysis (within 1 year).
- The planned AVF site must be naïve of prior AVF creations.
- Vein mapping studies completed
- 2.5 - 3mm minimum vein diameter on mapping
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 18 years of age.
- Inability to provide consent.
- Previous failed AVFs in both arms.
Contraindications to AVF creation:
- ipsilateral proximal venous and arterial occlusion or stenosis
- systemic or local infection
- too ill to operate
- Anticipated inability to keep 30-day postoperative follow-up appointment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Clipped anastomosis
A vascular clip device will be used to create the anastomosis during arteriovenous fistula creation.
|
The vascular clip devise will be used to complete the anastomosis during fistula creation.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Handsewn anastomosis
A handsewn technique will be used to create the anastomosis in arteriovenous fistula creation.
|
a handsewn anastomosis technique will be used during fistula creation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patency rates
Time Frame: 2 years postoperative
|
Patency will be assessed and the fistula considered patent if it has been accessed for dialysis at least once, or based on clinical assessment with palpable thrill if dialysis access has not been attempted.
|
2 years postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical complications
Time Frame: 2 years postoperative
|
Complications will be monitored intraoperatively, and postoperatively.
These include any re-interventions, and wound complications, infection, hematoma, thrombosis , steal syndrome, distal ischemia.
|
2 years postoperative
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost
Time Frame: 1 year postoperative
|
Cost for the vascular clip device will be compared to cost of the handsewn technique.
|
1 year postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Clark A Davis, MD, Gundersen Lutheran Health System
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Baguneid MS, Goldner S, Fulford PE, Hamilton G, Walker MG, Seifalian AM. A comparison of para-anastomotic compliance profiles after vascular anastomosis: nonpenetrating clips versus standard sutures. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Apr;33(4):812-20. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.112806.
- Lin PH, Bush RL, Nelson JC, Lam R, Paladugu R, Chen C, Quinn G, Lumsden AB. A prospective evaluation of interrupted nitinol surgical clips in arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Am J Surg. 2003 Dec;186(6):625-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.08.007.
- Varcoe RL, Teo AB, Pelletier MH, Yu Y, Yang JL, Crowe PJ, Walsh WR. An arteriovenous fistula model of intimal hyperplasia for evaluation of a nitinol U-Clip anastomosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;43(2):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
- Shenoy S, Miller A, Petersen F, Kirsch WM, Konkin T, Kim P, Dickson C, Schild AF, Stewart L, Reyes M, Anton L, Woodward RS. A multicenter study of permanent hemodialysis access patency: beneficial effect of clipped vascular anastomotic technique. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Aug;38(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00412-9.
- Shenoy S, Woodward RS. Economic impact of the beneficial effect of changing vascular anastomotic technique in hemodialysis access. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;39(5):437-43. doi: 10.1177/153857440503900509.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2-12-07-002
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.