Phase II Study of Azacitidine and Sargramostim as Maintenance Treatment for Poor-Risk AML or MDS

September 23, 2022 updated by: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

A Phase II Study of 5-Azacitidine (5AC) in Combination With Sargramostim (GM-CSF) as Maintenance Treatment, After Definitive Therapy With Either Stem Cell Transplant (SCT) or Cytarabine-based Chemotherapy, in Patients With Poor-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

To determine the impact of maintenance therapy in patients with MDS/AML in remission.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

We propose a phase II study to determine the impact of maintenance therapy with 5-azacytidine and GM-CSF in patients with poor-risk AML or MDS, who are in remission after definitive treatment with either stem cell transplant or cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy.

In order to precede relapse and to avoid lead time bias, treatment would need to commence within 185 days of definitive therapy. Furthermore, approximately 50% of relapses occur within the first year and up to 80% within two years after SCT, therefore we would limit the duration of maintenance therapy to one year, followed by two years of follow-up.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 6 months
  2. Initial diagnosis of poor -risk AML or MDS (defined in section 3.2), treated with either stem cell transplant or cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy, within the past 60-185 days
  3. ECOG performance status 0-2
  4. No morphologic evidence of leukemia or active MDS as determined by JHH Hematopathologist independent review of a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy done following the completion of therapy and within 14 days prior to enrollment
  5. Peripheral blood count recovery: Neutrophil count ≥ 1000 /µL, platelet count ≥ 50x 109 /µL without platelet transfusions, and adequate hematocrit independent of red cell transfusions .
  6. No evidence of extramedullary leukemia, such as CNS or soft tissue involvement
  7. Adequate end organ function as measured by the following: AST and ALT < 4 x normal, total serum bilirubin < 2 x upper limit normal (unless due to hemolysis, Gilbert's syndrome, or ineffective erythropoiesis), creatinine < 2 x upper limit of normal
  8. Ability to give informed consent
  9. In agreement to use an effective barrier method of birth control to avoid pregnancy during the study and for a minimum of 30 days after study treatment, for all male and female patients who are fertile

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with untreated or uncontrolled infections
  2. Patients with untreated or uncontrolled grade 3 or 4 GVHD
  3. Pregnancy and lactation
  4. Concurrent use of any other investigational agents.
  5. Known HIV-positive patients.
  6. Known hypersensitivity to 5AC or GM-CSF

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Myeloablative BMT
Azacitidine and sargramostim after myeloablative stem cell transplant
Drug: Azacitidine
Azacitidine will be administered days 1-5 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment is planned for a total of 12 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Azacytidine
  • Vidaza
  • 5-azacytidine
Biological: Sargramostim
Sargramostim will be administered days 1-10 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment is planned for a total of 12 cycles.
Other Names:
  • GM-CSF
Experimental: Non-myeloablative BMT
Azacitidine and sargramostim after non-myeloablative stem cell transplant
Drug: Azacitidine
Azacitidine will be administered days 1-5 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment is planned for a total of 12 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Azacytidine
  • Vidaza
  • 5-azacytidine
Biological: Sargramostim
Sargramostim will be administered days 1-10 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment is planned for a total of 12 cycles.
Other Names:
  • GM-CSF
Experimental: Standard consolidation
Azacitidine and sargramostim after standard consolidation
Drug: Azacitidine
Azacitidine will be administered days 1-5 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment is planned for a total of 12 cycles.
Other Names:
  • Azacytidine
  • Vidaza
  • 5-azacytidine
Biological: Sargramostim
Sargramostim will be administered days 1-10 of a 28 day cycle. Treatment is planned for a total of 12 cycles.
Other Names:
  • GM-CSF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Two-year Relapse Free Survival of Patients
Time Frame: 2 year
To evaluate the two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) of patients with poor-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplasia (MDS), who receive maintenance treatment with 5-Azacytidine (5AC) in combination with sargramostim (GM-CSF) during remission, following definitive therapy with either a stem cell transplant (SCT) or cytarabine-based consolidation chemotherapy.
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hematologic Toxicity as Determined by Anemia
Time Frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients with anemia, the most commonly reported hematologic toxicity, after receiving the combination of Azacitidine and sargramostim
1 year
One-year RFS
Time Frame: 1 year
We will report the number of participants with one year RFS
1 year
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 2 years
Percentage of participants with overall survival at 2 years.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Margaret Showel, MD, JHU

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • J1240
  • P01CA015396 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NA_00072223 (Other Identifier: JHMIRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Azacitidine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings