A Trial of Rigid Versus Semirigid Thoracoscopy in the Evaluation of Exudative Pleural Effusions (RISE)
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Rigid Versus Semirigid Thoracoscopy in the Evaluation of Exudative Pleural Effusions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Chandigarh, India, 160012
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an exudative (as defined by Light's criteria) pleural effusion of unknown etiology after a microbiological (namely gram stain and acid fast bacillus stain) and cytological examination
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant hypoxemia on room air
- Hemodynamic instability
- Significant cardiac disease (known myocardial infarction in last 6 weeks or presence of unstable angina)
- Refractory cough
- Lack of pleural space due to adhesions
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Rigid thoracoscopy
Rigid thoracoscopy would be done using a rigid thoracoscope manufactured by Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany.
|
Pleuroscopy using a rigid thoracoscope manufactured by Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany
|
|
Active Comparator: Semirigid thoracoscopy
The semirigid thoracoscope employed is a model LTF-160Y1, manufactured by Olympus Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
|
Pleuroscopy using a semirigid thoracoscope model LTF-160Y1, manufactured by Olympus Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic yield of thoracoscopic biopsy by intention to treat analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The proportion of patients where thoracoscopic pleural biopsy yielded a diagnosis that was consistent with the present clinical picture and the further follow-up of the patients, would be calculated and compared between the two arms
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Yield of biopsies successfully completed
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The diagnostic yield of only those procedures would be considered separately where a biopsy could be successfully done and compared between the two arms
|
3 months
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Number of major and minor complications encountered in the two arms
|
3 months
|
|
Scar size
Time Frame: At the end of the procedure
|
Scar size (in mm) in the longest axis
|
At the end of the procedure
|
|
Biopsy size
Time Frame: At the end of the procedure
|
Biopsy size (in mm) in the longest axis
|
At the end of the procedure
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use of sedation and analgesia during the procedure
Time Frame: At the end of procedure
|
The quantity of drugs used for sedation and analgesia during the procedure would be recorded and compared between the two arms
|
At the end of procedure
|
|
Operators' experience characteristics
Time Frame: At the end of the procedure
|
These would include, on a numerical scale of 0 to 100, the operator's grading of the following characteristics: quality of thoracoscopic image, ease of maneuvering, ease of taking a biopsy and the operator's expectation that the biopsy will reveal a definitive histological diagnosis
|
At the end of the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ritesh Agarwal, MD, DM, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1Trg-PG-2012/5054
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.