QI Study of a Practice Facilitator's Impact in Working With Clinics on Improving Dental, Lead & Obesity Measures for Children

December 2, 2014 updated by: Sharon Meropol, MD, PhD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Child Healthcare Excellence Center - A University-Practice-Public Partnership (CHEC-UPPP)

Funded by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services - Medicaid Technical Assistance and Policy Program (MEDTAPP), the "Child Health Excellence Center - a University-Practice-Public Partnership" (CHEC-UPPP) focuses on improving the health of Ohio's children in 3 target areas: 1) prevention of dental decay; 2) detection and management of overweight and obesity; and 3) lead screening. These topics represent critical public health issues for Ohio's children.

The study is based on strong evidence that interventions are needed to improve practice in the target areas and that achieving these goals represents fundamental improvements in child health care that would reduce morbidity and costs. The approach for the study involves a trained Practice Facilitator (PF) working with multiple pediatric and family medicine practices to create change tailored to individual practice preferences and methods of operation.

Our overall hypothesis is that a university-community consortium, utilizing evidence-based methods (involving education plus a facilitated, practice-tailored approach) will increase the rates of targeted services in primary care practices.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The research design involves a sample of 30 primary care practices (a combination of pediatric and family medicine) from across Northeast Ohio who have at least a 20% Medicaid patient population. We are using a cross-over study design. After the run-in period during which baseline data is collected via chart review and all practices receive basic education in the 3 focal areas of lead, dental and obesity screening, the practices will be randomly assigned to one of two groups.

The Phase 1 group will receive the practice-tailored intervention with the Practice Facilitator (PF) starting immediately after randomization and continuing for 6 months. The Phase 2 group will start their practice-tailored intervention with the PF 4 months post-randomization and continue through post-randomization month 10.

This design gives us a natural 'control' group (Phase 2 group) for the first four months post-randomization. The Phase 2 group will have had the same Run-in Phase education as the Phase 1 group, but will not be starting the practice-tailored intervention with the study facilitator for 4 months, at which time they will cross-over to their Intervention Phase.

Both Phase 1 and Phase 2 groups will have a 2 month Follow-up Phase after the completion of their 6 month Intervention Phase. During the Follow-up Phase they will strive to continue reaching the outcome measures on their own without the support of the PF. This will give us an opportunity to assess short-term sustainability of the rates of delivery of services achieved during the Intervention Phase.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospital Case Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Practice site has 20% or more Medicaid patient population
  • Practice is located in Northeast Ohio

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Practice has less than 20% Medicaid patient population
  • Practice is out of the targeted area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Practice-tailored intervention - Early/Phase 1
During the 6 month Intervention Phase the Practice Facilitator works with each practice to create changes that are tailored to their individual preferences and methods of operation. Sites randomized to Early/Phase 1 start their 6 month intervention immediately after randomization.
Other: Practice-tailored intervention to increase rates of targeted services

Over a 6 month period, the Practice Facilitator (PF), offers individualized suggestions, strategies and tools for streamlining processes and incorporating new ideas into the flow of a practice's work day to increase their rates of delivery of the 3 targeted services of lead screening, obesity detection and dental decay prevention.

During the intervention visits the PF reviews a small number of recent well-visit charts. This allows for rapid feedback to a practice on their progress as they work toward reaching outcome measures. It also provides 'real time' feedback regarding the degree to which suggested interventions are working, allowing the PF to change the approach as needed.
EXPERIMENTAL: Practice-tailored intervention - Late/Phase 2
The Phase 2 group will start the practice-tailored intervention with the study facilitator 4 months post-randomization and continue through post-randomization month 10.
Other: Practice-tailored intervention to increase rates of targeted services

Over a 6 month period, the Practice Facilitator (PF), offers individualized suggestions, strategies and tools for streamlining processes and incorporating new ideas into the flow of a practice's work day to increase their rates of delivery of the 3 targeted services of lead screening, obesity detection and dental decay prevention.

During the intervention visits the PF reviews a small number of recent well-visit charts. This allows for rapid feedback to a practice on their progress as they work toward reaching outcome measures. It also provides 'real time' feedback regarding the degree to which suggested interventions are working, allowing the PF to change the approach as needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lead screening for at-risk 12 and 24 month olds
Time Frame: At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Assessing the rate of lead screening for eligible (i.e., at risk) 12 and 24 month old children is our primary outcome. This is assessed by chart review in the medical record for the index visit.
At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Identification of BMI percentile and weight diagnosis catergory in 2-17 year olds
Time Frame: At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Assessing the rate of recorded BMI and 2) and rate of accurate recorded weight diagnosis category (underweight < 5th percentile; healthy weight 5th percentile -<85th percentile; overweight 85th percentile - <95th percentile; or obese > 95th percentile) for children 2-17 years of age is our primary outcome. This is assessed by chart review in the medical record for the index visit.
At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Application of dental fluoride varnish for 12-36 month olds
Time Frame: At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Assessing the rate of dental fluoride varnish application for eligible children 12-36 months of age is our primary outcome. This is assessed by chart review in the medical record for the index visit or within the preceding 6 months.
At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of elevated lead levels and appropriate follow-up for 12 and 24 months lead screenings
Time Frame: At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Our secondary outcome for lead is assessing the rate of rate of elevated lead levels and appropriate follow-up for elevated lead levels per ODH Testing Requirements and Medical Mgmt Recommendations. This is assessed by chart review in the medical record for the index visit for those who had a lead screening at 12 and 24 months.
At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Rates of appropriate counseling for nutrition & activity and appropriate screening for co-morbidities
Time Frame: At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Our secondary outcome for obesity is assessing the rate of appropriate counseling for nutrition and activity for those in the healthy weight, overweight or obese categories and the rate of appropriate screening for co-morbidities for those in overweight and obese categories. This is assessed by chart review in the medical record for the index visit for those 2-17 years of age.
At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Rates of oral screening and referral to a dentist for 12-36 month olds
Time Frame: At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase
Our secondary outcome for dental decay prevention is assessing the rate of oral screening and referral to a dentist by age 12 months or for abnormal oral screenings.
At baseline, every 2 months during the 6 month Intervention Phase, and after the 2 month Follow-up Phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ohio Department of Job and Family Services

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Leona Cuttler, M.D., University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10-10-07

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Practice-tailored intervention to increase rates of targeted services

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings