Study to Determine if Gardasil Vaccine is Safe and Effective in Lupus Patients (GARDASIL)

February 26, 2018 updated by: Patricia Dhar, Wayne State University

Phase I, Safety and Immunogenicity of Gardasil® in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Cervical neoplasia is increased in women with SLE most likely due to cervical infection with human papilloma virus (HPV). 70% of cervical cancer is caused by HPV types 16 and 18. Gardasil vaccine prevents cervical infection with HPV types 16 and 18. Thus lupus patients (who are susceptible to cervical cancer) may benefit from getting Gardasil vaccine which can prevent cervical cancer. Vaccines are generally safe and efficacious in SLE but no studies have been done on the use of this vaccine in SLE. The investigators hypothesize that Gardasil vaccine is safe and effective in SLE. This study will look at vaccine safety in patients with mild to moderate and minimally active or inactive SLE and measure how well they make protective antibodies after receiving the vaccine. In other words this will check how well the vaccine works in SLE.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To gather safety information and adverse events on the use of Gardasil® in mild to moderate and minimally active or inactive SLE.

To gather information on SLE disease activity flares after vaccination with Gardasil®.

To gather information on the immunogenicity or development of protective anti HPV antibodies SLE after vaccination with Gardasil®.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • DCaTS-Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE) by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria.

History of a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result at any time in the past.

40 participants with history of mild to moderate SLE disease Minimally active or inactive SLE disease, i.e., (Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosis National Assessment (SELENA) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), SELENA-SLEDAI ≤2 at the start of the study.

Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 50 years. Gender: females Ability to provide informed consent. Maintenance Prednisone dose ≤ 15 mg/day. Plaquenil ≤ 400 mg/day.

Exclusion Criteria:

Hypersensitivity to any vaccine component Active infections including but not limited to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV positive), Hepatitis B or C, tuberculosis.

Positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test results without evidence of prior treatment or administration of bacilli Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine. A positive PPD is defined as ≥ 5 mm induration 24-38 hours after receiving 5TU (TU=tuberculin units) of PPD.

Pregnancy or desire to become pregnant during the study period. Breast feeding. Inability to complete the immunization series. Received any blood product or component in the previous 6 months before enrollment.

Received any inactivated vaccine product within 14 days before enrollment. Received any live vaccine product within 21 days before enrollment.

Fever (temperature > 100°F) at the time of enrollment. Inability to provided informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Gardasil
0.5 ml single dose Gardasil vaccine given at three separate visits
Drug: Gardasil
0.5 ml Gardasil vaccine in single dose prefilled syringes at Visit 2, Visit 4 and Visit 6

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1,61,66,181,186,211,330 days
Frequency of participants with Vaccine site reactions, Frequency of participants with Non Vaccine Adverse Events,
1,61,66,181,186,211,330 days
Number of Non Vaccine Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1,61,66,181,186,211,330 days
the number of non vaccine adverse events
1,61,66,181,186,211,330 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seroconversion by HPV Serotypes (HPV 6, HPV 11, HPV 16, HPV 18)as Assessed by Geometric Mean Antibody Titer
Time Frame: Baseline (prevaccine) neutralizing anti HPV antibody titers at visit 1 and anti HPV antibody titers at 1 month post 3rd vaccine shot which is at 7 months in the study.
1. The percentage of HPV naive women who seroconverted by HPV serotypes was measured using Geometric Mean Titers for HPV serotypes HPV 6, HPV 11, HPV 16, HPV 18
Baseline (prevaccine) neutralizing anti HPV antibody titers at visit 1 and anti HPV antibody titers at 1 month post 3rd vaccine shot which is at 7 months in the study.
SLE Disease Activity Flares
Time Frame: 1,61,66,181,186,211,330 days
SELENA-SLEDAI measurements > or = to 2 The SELENA/SLEDAI is a validated instrument which is used to score disease activity and define flares with the SELENA-SLEDAI score range being 0-105, with 0 indicating inactive disease.The SELENA/SLEDAI instrument consists of 24 items, each with a definition of activity; there are 16 clinical items and 8 laboratory items. Although there are no set standards, inactive or minimal disease is generally reflected by a SELENA/SLEDAI score of less than or equal to 2 while more than minimally active disease is reflected by a score of >2.
1,61,66,181,186,211,330 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wayne State University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patricia J Dhar, MD, Wayne State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0412GARDASIL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No individual data will be shared with any researcher, only aggregated de-identified data

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings