Intranasal Fentanyl for Management of Pain Associated With Cystoscopic Procedures
A Prospective Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 100 mcg and 200 mcg of Intranasal Fentanyl Pectin Spray as an Analgesic in Adult Males Undergoing Outpatient Cystoscopic Procedures
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Torrance, California, United States, 90502
- Urology Clinic, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Male adult patients scheduled for cystoscopy; additional procedures (e.g. ureteral stent placement, stent exchange, bladder biopsy, retrograde pyelogram) may be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of analgesic abuse or opioid tolerance
- Allergy to fentanyl or to any of the components of Lazanda®
- Acute/chronic nasal problems such as rhinitis or sinusitis
- Acute bronchial asthma / upper airway obstruction
- Presence of bradycardia or history of seizures
- Concomitant use of drugs that inhibit cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (e.g., ritonavir, ketoconazole, itraconazole, troleandomycin, clarithromycin, nelfinavir, nefazodone, amprenavir, aprepitant, diltiazem, erythromycin, fluconazole, fosamprenavir, monoamine oxidase inhibitors and verapamil) or exposure to these drugs 30 days prior to placement on the study.
- Concomitant use of vasoconstrictive nasal decongestants (e.g., oxymetazoline, phenylephrine, xylometazoline)
- Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score more than 0 at baseline
- Any situation or condition which, in the investigator's opinion, puts the subject at significant risk, or could confound the study results.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Intranasal Fentanyl 100mcg
fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100mcg
|
comparison of Intranasal fentanyl 100mcg vs 200 mcg.
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Intranasal Fentanyl 200mcg
fentanyl pectin nasal spray 200mcg
|
comparison of Intranasal fentanyl 100mcg vs 200 mcg.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in pain numeric rating scale
Time Frame: within 3 hours post administration of the drug
|
The primary endpoint is the worst pain experienced at any time during the procedure. Pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS score 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain). |
within 3 hours post administration of the drug
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Oxyhemoglobin saturation
Time Frame: Every 5 minutes post administration of the drug until 3 hours
|
Pulse oximetry will be recorded at baseline and every 5 minutes for 3 hours post drug-administration.
|
Every 5 minutes post administration of the drug until 3 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: every 15 minutes until 3 hours post drug-administration
|
Will be recorded at baseline and every 15 minutes for 3 hours post drug-administration.
|
every 15 minutes until 3 hours post drug-administration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Patel AR, Jones JS, Babineau D. Lidocaine 2% gel versus plain lubricating gel for pain reduction during flexible cystoscopy: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized, controlled trials. J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):986-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.065. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
- Taghizadeh AK, El Madani A, Gard PR, Li CY, Thomas PJ, Denyer SP. When does it hurt? Pain during flexible cystoscopy in men. Urol Int. 2006;76(4):301-3. doi: 10.1159/000092051.
- Calleary JG, Masood J, Van-Mallaerts R, Barua JM. Nitrous oxide inhalation to improve patient acceptance and reduce procedure related pain of flexible cystoscopy for men younger than 55 years. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):184-8; discussion 188. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.036. Epub 2007 May 17.
- Song YS, Song ES, Kim KJ, Park YH, Ku JH. Midazolam anesthesia during rigid and flexible cystoscopy. Urol Res. 2007 Jun;35(3):139-42. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0091-7. Epub 2007 Apr 6.
- Hruby G, Ames C, Chen C, Yan Y, Sagar J, Baron P, Landman J. Assessment of efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain management during office-based flexible cystoscopy. Urology. 2006 May;67(5):914-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.043.
- Striebel HW, Koenigs D, Kramer J. Postoperative pain management by intranasal demand-adapted fentanyl titration. Anesthesiology. 1992 Aug;77(2):281-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199208000-00010.
- Striebel HW, Pommerening J, Rieger A. Intranasal fentanyl titration for postoperative pain management in an unselected population. Anaesthesia. 1993 Sep;48(9):753-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07583.x.
- Striebel HW, Olmann T, Spies C, Brummer G. Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia (PCINA) for the management of postoperative pain: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Feb;8(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00167-0.
- Striebel HW, Oelmann T, Spies C, Rieger A, Schwagmeier R. Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: a method for noninvasive postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 1996 Sep;83(3):548-51. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199609000-00019.
- Striebel HW, Kramer J, Luhmann I, Rohierse-Hohler I, Rieger A. [Pharmacokinetics of intranasal Fentanyl.]. Schmerz. 1993 Jun;7(2):122-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02527870. No abstract available. German.
- Toussaint S, Maidl J, Schwagmeier R, Striebel HW. Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: effective alternative to intravenous PCA for postoperative pain relief. Can J Anaesth. 2000 Apr;47(4):299-302. doi: 10.1007/BF03020941.
- Saunders M, Adelgais K, Nelson D. Use of intranasal fentanyl for the relief of pediatric orthopedic trauma pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;17(11):1155-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00905.x.
- Borland M, Jacobs I, King B, O'Brien D. A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
- Borland ML, Bergesio R, Pascoe EM, Turner S, Woodger S. Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: a randomised double blind crossover study. Burns. 2005 Nov;31(7):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
- Foster D, Upton R, Christrup L, Popper L. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal versus intravenous fentanyl in patients with pain after oral surgery. Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1380-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L168. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
- Christrup LL, Foster D, Popper LD, Troen T, Upton R. Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and tolerability of fentanyl following intranasal versus intravenous administration in adults undergoing third-molar extraction: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-way, crossover study. Clin Ther. 2008 Mar;30(3):469-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.03.001.
- Fuhr U. Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Extent, probable mechanism and clinical relevance. Drug Saf. 1998 Apr;18(4):251-72. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818040-00002.
- Baele P, Kestens-Servaye Y, Goenen M. MAOI and cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jun;40(6):579-80. doi: 10.1007/BF03009749. No abstract available.
- Gillman PK. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, opioid analgesics and serotonin toxicity. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;95(4):434-41. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei210. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
- Noble WH, Baker A. MAO inhibitors and coronary artery surgery: a patient death. Can J Anaesth. 1992 Dec;39(10):1061-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03008376.
- Dale O, Hjortkjaer R, Kharasch ED. Nasal administration of opioids for pain management in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Aug;46(7):759-70. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460702.x.
- Fisher A, Watling M, Smith A, Knight A. Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 microg in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Dec;48(12):860-7. doi: 10.5414/cpp48860.
- Hansen MS, Mathiesen O, Trautner S, Dahl JB. Intranasal fentanyl in the treatment of acute pain--a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Apr;56(4):407-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02613.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
- Panagiotou I, Mystakidou K. Intranasal fentanyl: from pharmacokinetics and bioavailability to current treatment applications. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010 Jul;10(7):1009-21. doi: 10.1586/era.10.77.
- Prommer E, Thompson L. Intranasal fentanyl for pain control: current status with a focus on patient considerations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Mar 18;5:157-64. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S7665.
- Kress HG, Oronska A, Kaczmarek Z, Kaasa S, Colberg T, Nolte T. Efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl spray 50 to 200 microg for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer: a phase III, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with a 10-month, open-label extension treatment period. Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31(6):1177-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.022.
- Mercadante S, Radbruch L, Davies A, Poulain P, Sitte T, Perkins P, Colberg T, Camba MA. A comparison of intranasal fentanyl spray with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: an open-label, randomised, crossover trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2805-15. doi: 10.1185/03007990903336135.
- Chung F. Discharge criteria--a new trend. Can J Anaesth. 1995 Nov;42(11):1056-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011083.
- Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20812-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.